Newspaper Page Text
J3 ' 1 . i It'1 THOMAS LORING, EDITOR AND PROPRIETOR THE CONSTITUTION AND THE UNION OP THE STATES VTHEY "MUST BE PRESERVED. VOL. VI. -NO. 274. THREE DOLLARS PER A-NNUM. RALEIGH, N. C. WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 29, 1840. THE NORTH CAROLINA STANDARD s published weekly, at three dollars per annum payable yearly in advance. A subscriber fail ing to give notice of his desire to discontinue at the expiration of the period for which he may have paid, will be considered as having subscribed anew, and the paper continued, at the option'of the Editor, until ordered to be stopped ; but no paper will be discontinued, until all arrearages are paid. Advertisements, not exceeding fourteen lines, willbe inserted onetime for one dollar, and, twenty five cents for each subsequent insertion; those of greater lengtli in proportion. If the number of in sertions be not marked on them, they will be con tinued until ordered out. Court Advertisements and Sheriffs Sales, will be charged twenty-five per cent, higher than the usual rates. . S,. A deduction of 33 per cent, will be made to those who advertise bv the year. Letters to the Editor must come free of postage, or they may not be attended to. POST OFFICE, RALEIGH, Hf. C. A List of Letters remaining in the Post Office, 31st December, 1839. A. Marv R. Anderson, W. W. Avery 3, James Alfri'end, John A. Averitt, Joshua Allen, John F. & W. Allen, Joh H. Arrington. B. Albert Benchy, Martha A. Butler, James Burke, Mary S. Bryan, Jesse Bryan, Alsa Be vers, John Bevers, Wesley S. Blake, James Buf falo, John Buffaloe 2, Jos. Buffaloe, William Durham, Otis Briggs, T. S. Beckwith & Co. 2, Stephen R. Bledsoe, Louis Boon, John A. Back house 2, Joseph Barlow, S. A. Baldwin, James Boylan, Jr., G. B. Bagwell, Martha Brickill, John Brown, W. A. Brown, Esther Ann Bridges, John Babb, William Bell, William Blalock, B. Buroughs, Sam'l R. Browning, Henry Benni field, Robert Broadfoot. C. D. Culbrith, William Oliver Clark, T. L Clingman, Sarah Cook, Maria Cook, Wil liam B. Cook 3, John Cope, Alexander Camp bell, Thomas F. Christman, Mary A. Crolley, John Chesnult 2. Cactanoda Costa, James D. Cooley, James W. Chadivick. William Carlicke. D. Martha A. Dowd, P. W. Dowd 2. James Dempster, William Davis, James C. Dance, Re becca C. Dopuy, James Davis, I. Dowlhat, Ro bert B. Daniel. JE. G. W. Evan?, Virginia P. Eaton, Can dace Ellis, Soih Even-it. , F. James A. Fish 2, Tames G. Fletcher, I. B. Freeman 2, Mrs. Fclton, Annelizer Felton, Mary Furcurson, Thomas Frentress, Hinton Franklin 2, Gillum R. Faror. Q. Williun C. Graves, Sesikiah Goodwin, Henry W. Gihbs 2. William A. Graham, Edwin Grant, John B. Green 3, Francis A. Gordon, James Gordon, M. S. Goldsborough, General G red ell. John Griffis, Charlotte Gorman. IT. E!iz:i IIairesr..L Elinton, Emt'l.-nc; Hun- ter, J. Mc. G. Hunter, Isom Holden, J. Hutch r inss, Benjnmin S. Harrison, Robird Harrison, Mather Hart, Alvin Hamilton, Mary Hartsfield, M. E. Hopkins, Joel Howingron, Sinthy H w ard, Willis Hamilton, Jackson Hamilton, Mary Milliard. Hannah Hirding, Alex. M. High 2. Waiter Hubbard, Joseph Hall, Divid H. Hol land, Joseph Hill, Robert Hill, Eliza M. Hill, Thomas Howey, Anthony Nipper, Gtorge W. Howard, llinsom Hinton, Wiley House, Wiles Hubby. J. Alpheus Jones,- Wesley Jones, Minton Jones, Henry Jones, C. Jones, E. A. Jones, Charles Jones, Robert B.Jones, Mary W. Jones 2, Lonisa Jones, Maihew Jones 2, Hicksy Jonson. Ransom Jonson, Simon Johnson, Margaret P. Johnson, M. Johnson, Maria W. Johnson, Mr. Johnson. K. L. A. Kyle, Mary W. Knox, William D. Kenner, Philip Koonce, Harrison Kirkham, Jno. Keatley, John Keatley 2. Jj. Moses Lassiter, Alfred W. Lewis 2, Cath arine A. Lewis, William Loughey, Simon A. Lichtenhan, A. J. Loftis, John Layn, Mary Van deline Lindeman, Claton Lea, William Leach, William Lashley, John J. Lee, John Little, Jane W. Liggon, Joseph Langster, Anderson Lucas, Littleton Leachman, Damn's Leavey, John A. Leach. M. Edward W. Monffort 2. Caroline A. Mc donald, Mary McComick, Wm. McCargo, Jno. McKinsey, Rutha Morris, Abrihan McQueen, Geo. C. Mendenhall, Wm. J. McLiy, Mary Ann Murrell. Fany Murdin, Mrs. Miller, J. Julias Martin, John Merrit, Chaley Moore, John C. Moore, 'Jesse Moore, Mary Mase, Ann Myatt, Cherry Melone, William B. Meares, Alfred Mitchel. John Mitchell. N. Delier Nichols, George Nance, Augus tin Norten, David Outtaw 2, Ex-Gov'nor Owen. P. Jonathan Pruden, Jno. Primrose, Turner Pullen, Elizabeth Pullen, Feureba Pilkinton, Henry Phelps, George K. Pickering 2. Penel ope L Paine, Gill Patrick, 3ohn Pore, Lucy A Pullum, Mary E. Porter, Nancy Patton, Nancy Payton, Rubin Perry, Clary Perry. William A. Patterson, Mikel Penny, William Parish. R. Benjamin Rogers, James M. Rogers, James W. Rogers. William S. Rogers 2, Wil liam W. Roland 2, N. G. Rand, S. S. Rea7es, James Rowland, J. S. Randolph, Ausborne Ran dolph, Thomas Ruffin, Mary Revels, William Robards. Delia Revels, John Rourke, John W. Rice, Wiley Robertson, WTilliam F. Robertson Sarah Jane Robertson, Robert Rodrick, Judge Ruffin, Mary H. Ruffin, Charles Raborn, J. Ro gers, Jonn Rucker, Berry Richerson, Wiley Rowlang. S. Jas. Stephenson, N. L. B. Stithh, Jerry Starkey, Littleberry Sauls, Robert Sneed, Adaline L. Soloman 3, William M. Snellings, Britton Sugg, Polly Smith, Edward Stanley, Fahius Stanly, Re. Daniel Stratton. Sim'l B. Spruill, Francis M. A. Stuart 2, J. William Stuart, Ste phen Stephenson, John Schell, John Singletary, James Shaw, William Stothart, B. Smith, Sarah Saunders, R. T. Saunders, Phhe Spain, R. W. Stone, S. W. Stoddard, Christopher Smith, Lucy A. Soloman 3. T. Wm. Trusty, R. Tyler, William Terry, James S. Thompson, Geo. Thompson, Alfred Towns 2, James S. Terrell, Willis J. Turner, Lewis Taylor. U. Q-iinton Utley. IV. William Walls, Lunchfood Wornear, William T. Winslow, Jas. Woodard, James "Weathers, Mary Wilkin, George West, Au gustus H. West 3, Samuel Walton 2, William Walton, Hiram Woobard, Jordan Wright, Philo White, Ann White, Emma C. White, Ruffin W7illiams, S. M. Wheatpn, Gaston H. Wilder, Matild Wedding, Shadrack Wedding 2, George Waterson, John Wall, Sally Weaver, George Weaver, Mary Washington. Y. Mathew A. Yates, Thomas Young. Persons calling for any of the, above Let ters will please say they are advertised. THOS. G. SCOTT, P. M. Jan: 29. 273-3t. RE1UAKKS OF MR. BYNIWI, Of North .Carolina, In the House vf Representatives Dec. 24, 1839 On the resolution of Mr. Dawson of Georgia, to suspend the order of the House to go intd an election of Printer to the House of Repre sentatives for the Twenty-sixth Congress. Mr. Bynum said, inhe Hause would go into an election of Printer at this time, he would for bear making any remarks. If not, he would go on and say what he was about to say. Cries of " Go on." Sir, said Mr. B. if the American peo ple could have been assembled in this hall, and could have witnessed the proceedings of this House for the last three weeks, they, with the change of a single name, would have exclaimed, in the language of the Roman Orator, " Quous que tandem abutere, Calilina, patientia? nostra quamdiu nosetiam furor isle luus noseludet?" c. He said it had been twenty yeajs since he read this, and he might have erred ,in the quotation, but it was applicable to the occasion. This was the language of Cicero, when speaking of the Catalinean conspiracy. If the American peo ple had been present in our galleries since the commencement of our session, they might vary this quotation, and say, how long, O! Whig men, will you continue to abuse our patience? How long shall your madness outbrave our jus tice, and continue to insult our understandings, and procrastinate this idle debate, at an expense of hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Go vernment; at the sacrifice of every interest that is near and dear to us as American freemen. Why, sir. I would be willing to stake all I have in this world, ay, sir, I would be willing to stake my salvation, that there has been more money spent by the party which professes to desire a retrenchment in the expenses of the public print ing, iu idle, unnecessary deb ite, and in motions after motions to delay, procrastinate, and embar rass the business of this House this session, than the whole profits of the printing of Congress will be in the next five years. These debates have already cost the people of this country more than S 100,000, if not 8500,000. -We are here in the fourth week of the session of the Twenty-sixth Congress, and there has not yet been the first step taken towards proceeding to the discharge of the high duties for which we assembled. The House has as yet been but par tially organized. We have not yet elected a Printer, and the standing committees hive not 'yet been appointed j and, sir. Whose fault is it that this has not been clone? What party in this House has prevented the action and organi zation of the body ? What is it that has been slrogghng, day alter day, to slave pthe action of this House upon the matters which the ma jority desired to decide? And who is it that has introduced propositions time and again, which the Elvuse had previously decided, and called upon the House again to dt-cide these questions? These questions will all be exam ined into by the people, and they will be able to point to the party winch has occasioned all this delay and embairassment to the busimss of the nation. Uj gentlemen suppose that the peo ple are to be duped and misled? Do they sup pose that the freemen of this country are too ig norant to discover who it is that has piled mo tion upon motion in this House, in order and out of order, and consumed week after week in use less debate, when the business of the country was left untouched, and the public s?rvico suf fering? Do gentlemen suppose that by their superior talents they can dupe and impose upon the people of this country -by their cry of retrenchment, while they are thus squandering the public money in worse than useless debate, and leaving the public business untouched? Does the gentleman from Ohio, the gentleman from the Chilicothe district, I mean Mr. Bond, suppose that the people of this country arejso easily imposed upon? Sir, even the people of that unfortunate district cannot be imposed upon by that gentleman longer, for the Administration is fast gaining ground even there; and if the people of that district cannot be longer imposed upon, how can the gentleman expect to deceive the people at large? No gentleman of under standing can take a serious view of this whole transaction, and compare it with what has here tofore taken place, without pronouncing it one of the most farcial and ludicrous exhibitions ever attempted to be played off on the American peo ple. I am not here permitted to speak of the motives of gentlemen, because it is not in order ; but if it was, I mijjht say that we would: hear none of this cry of retrenchment, if the elec tion of this officer was to benefit a certain press, owned by a monster Bank, which is owned, in a great degree, by foreign capitalists, and which has always been hostile to the interests and rights of the people of this country. The course of honorable gentlemen might be very different on this occasion, if we are to judge from what has transpired on a previous occasion of a simi lar nature. It has been agin and again decided by the American people, that this British Bank was of the most deadly hostility to the rights and the liberties of the people of this country; and the people have elected a majority of Repre sentatives to this House at every session for ma ny years, who -rere opposed to this B ink, yet, for the last two years, that B ink has had the bene fit of the public printing of thi3 House, through its agents, Messrs. G lies and Seaton. In fact, strange as it may appear, the Bank of the United States was the Printer of this House for the last two years ; and no man could deny this as sertion, so far a3 its emoluments are concerned. Sir, the people have been humbugged too much on this suhiect to- borrow a favorite ex pression from the Opposition and it is time that they knew the whole iruth in relation to this mat ter. When the election of a public Printer was about to take place two years ago, the United States Bank was not strong enough to obtain the work without other aid, and a combination -was entered into here to secure to it the benefit of this election. In the first place, a resolution was submitted by a gentleman, whose name I- will not mention, as my relations with that gentle man are of a delicate character, showing the combination on its face". -.The resolution was as follows : "Resolved, .That the Clerk of the House be, and he is hereby, authorized to employ the editors of the Intelligencer, and the editor of the Madiso nian, equally, to execute the printing of the House upon the joint resolution of 1819, until the first Monday in December next." , This was a direct proposition, but it could not be carried, because some gentlerhen were afraid they might be called to accounthy their constitu ents for voting for such a proposition ; yet pre cisely the same proposition was carried by a se cret agreement between these parties, as every body thought at the time. The Whigs and Conservatives, at that time, in consequence of this agreement, united upon one Thomas Allen, and he was elected, nominally, public Printer for that Congress. I stated to this House then, that it would require an outlay of some thirty or forty thousand dollars to prepare a printing es tablishment to do the printing of this House; and 1 stated further, that Mr. Allen, being a young man just commencing business, was una ble to purchase an establishment to do this printing, and it was a ridiculous proposition to elect him principal Printer for the House. He, however was elected, and the people were de ceived. The people understood that a certain Thomas AllfD was elected, and was to do the printing of Congress. Well, did he do it? No, sir; he never did the first page of printing for this House, virtually. It was all done by Mes srs. Gales and Seaton, with an establishment notoriously belonging, to the United States Bank. These gentlemen could not be elected, because certain gentlemen could not vote for them and represent the wishes of their constiutnts; yet by an agreement, or, as the old story is, by whipping the devil around the stump, they en joyed the benefit of the printing of the last Con gress , while the people were induced to be lieve that Mr Allen alone enjoyed the benefits and profits arising from - the printing of that Congress. Yes, sir, the whole history of that transaction is without a parallel in the proceed ings of any legislative body "in this nation, if not in the world. A bargain, proposed, consumma ted,, and executed here in this body, to effect the grossest imposition on ihe American peoplethat had ever been attempted before to be perpetrated in this country ; by which means the Bank "of the United States was made virtually the Prin ter to the American Congress, with all its for eicn affinities and hostilities to the free institu tions of our country; and this, too, done by a party who have the boldness, I had like to have said effrontery, to stand up here now, and speak 6f corruption. Are gentlemen so deluded as to think for a moment that these things are incomprehensible to the people, or that the great mass of the peo ple tvive not mind enough to retain a just recol lection of the history of these tranactions? And is it to act over this disreputnble transaction to elect the Bank of the United States printer of this Congress, that this most extraordinary course has been resorted to by the Opposition to embarrass and delay the indispensable business of this country. I shall no w read a fev extracts from the jour nals of the proceedings of the House in relation to that flection, for the benefit of the gentlemen from Ohio, and some other gentleman on this floor. If I understand the motion now before the House correcilj', it is a motion of the hon orable gentleman from Georgu Mr. Diwson to suspend the election of a public Printer at the present time, for the purpose of instituting an in quiry in relation to the prices of printing; and I intend to jfhoiv what that gentleman's course A-as at the last session, when a similar motion was made. On the second day of the extra ses sion of Coirgress, two years ago, "Mr. Patton of Virsinia moved a resolution that the House proceed to the election of a public Printer for the Twenty sixth Congress, wjiich was agreed to. The House then proceeded to ballot, and after five or six ballots were taken, it was found that there was no election. The House then adjourned to the next day (Wednesday,) when Mr. Bronson, a gentleman whose Democracy had never been doubted in this House, moved the following resolution. " That the further balloting under the resolution of the preceding day should be suspended until the third Monday in December, and that the Clerk be directed to employ some person or persons to do the necessary printing of the House on the same terms it had been doue at former sessions." A motion was made by Mr. Grennell to lay Mr. Bronson's resolution on the table, and very fortunately the yeas-and nays happen to be recor ded on tha,t subject; and how do they stand? Why, sir, we find recorded, in favor of laying this resolution on the table, Mr. B. reading from the journal, the names of Messrs. Adams, Allen, Aycrigg, Bond, Hoffman, Mason of Ohio, Dawson, &c. It went through the wholo Whig alphabet, from John Gluincy Adams to Thomas Jone3 Yorke. Now, sir, (said Mr. B.) the re solution that I have just read, introduced by Mr. Bronson, a member from New York, was in substance identically such a resolution as is how proposed by the honorable member from Georgia, Mr. Dawson, whose patriotism has been so inflamed upon this occasion, and which has been advocated with so much warmth by his honorable friend from Ohio, Mr. Bond. nyainst which stands recorded the names, for all time to come, of these two most honorable and consistent gentlemen. But, sir, why should they alone be rebuked, when their names are accompanied with nine-tenths of their party. Yes. sir, the resolution of Mr. Bronson, iden tically the same in substance as Mr. Dawson's, was voted down by a unanimous vvuig vce , but Mr. Dawson's is now, by the same party, to be voted up, under similar, jf not" precisely the same, circumstances ; displaying an inconsis tency, the inevitable result of all parties that act without the least regard to principle. 1 nese things should not be. No party can or should long endure, th t would thus attempt" to practise on the credulity of mankind. At that time, the Whig and Conservative pat ties in this House were thirsting for some of the spoils, as they now carl it, and voted to get rid of every resolution or proposition to suspend the election of a public Printer for any period. Now, however, the times are changed, and gen- Offered by Mr. Wise-of Virginia. See the jour nals of the Extra session of 1837. tlemen necessarily, change their action with them. If these gentlemen had the same pros pect, by any combination, of electing their Prin ter, which they had at the last Congress, they would be the l.tst men to postpone or thwart an election of public Printer; but "now that there was a probability that another Printer would be elected, they used every means within their power to slave off the question by distracting ana em barrassing the business of the House by every means that ingenuity could invent. But, sir, there was another favorite proposition of these Gentlemen, submitted at the time Mr. Bronson's resolution was under consideration. Mf. Pick ens at that-time moved an Amendment, "that the printing of the House be given out by con tract," and on this proposition the names of the gentleman from Massachuseltss, Mr. Adams, and oi the gentleman from" New York, Mr. Hoffman, were recorded in the negative, and others, now of the Opposi-ion. fMr. HvfffliHn explained that he had voted a- gainst the amendment because he believe'd then ' as he now believed, that the House could not give out their printing by contract until the re solution of 1819 was repealed. JSv. Bynum. The gentleman's explanation is perfectly -satisfactory ; but how was it with re gard to some ten or a dozen of his friends who voted in the same way whh Mr. John, C. Clark at their head ? I admit that a majority of the Administration pajty voted with these gentlemen, and they did so because they believed it impracticable-to enter into an investigation of so im portant a matter, while they were in the act of balloting for a Printer, and when the important business for which they had been called togeth er was pressing upon them. This was a matter which required time and careful scrutiny, and the House was then unprepared to go into it, as it is now unprepared to do so. It was im possible for the House now, after it had spent a month of the session in idle, useless de bate, to go into this mailer and put off the im portant business of the country for another month; and if gentlemen are serious in regard to this matter, let them wait until the Hue is organized in the regular and usual "way, and the elections gone through with, and then introduce this matter in the shape of a resolution or bill direct. It is a question which requires time for investigation and reflection. I myself am not now prepared to say how I should vote on this question when it is properly brought up. Several years 9go, I voted for Mr. Pic ken's resolution. I offered a similar one the other day, and I did it as a kind of peace offering. I would now, af ter the election is gone into, and carried ojt, re new that resolution honestly and in good faith. As at present impressed, I think I should vote for a separation .of the Government from the po litical press; but I have not examined the mat ter sufficiently in detail to enable me to spek positively on the subject. But I want a coo!, deliberate, and honest investigation ,pf the sub ject; and if it can be discovered, that good result from a separation of the Government from the political, press, I will go for it. 'But, siril do not desire to intermix trifling with scrious matters, because, not having the talents of some gentlemen oniVjis floor, I am unable effectually to mystify thei? questions before the public and the world; and if I was to attempt to do so, I should be exposed ns I ought to be, to the indig nant frowns of an honest people. Sir, my con stituents are too honest and discerning to tolerate for a moment such an attempt. I shall now say a few words in reply to the gentleman from Ohio, Mr. Bond. with regard to the petition of Francis P. Blair. On that sub ject, too, it am 1 not egregiously mistaken, 1 think I shall ne able to show the most reckless wmt of all regard for consistency, I will not say principle, by that honoruble member nnd his consistency loving parsy. I will show that the latter part of the resolution, now proposed by fhe honorable member from Georgia, was then en tertained, growing out of the petition of Mr. Blair, and a motion for a select committee, for a reference of the whole matter, was resisted al most unanimously by the selfsame party; and I think that the journals will show that these same crentlenien then resisted the reference of this identical proposition to a select committee of this House. He would read the resolution as it was finally referred : " Resolved, That so much of the memorial of Francis P. Blair, as invites scrutiny of all his accounts for work executed for Congress and the public offices, be referred to a select com mittee, with instructions to inquire into the man ner in which the public printing for Congress and the Executive Departments has been ex ecuted; whether the same has been dune con formably to law, and whether any, and what, change can be mide (or the public good." That subject came before this House, not in a questionable shape, as the gentleman from Ohio would have it, but in the shape of a peti tion; and the humblest American free citizen, he trusted, would ever have the right to petition this body for a redress of grievances, and to ask for such measures of legislation as would do them justice if they wereivroned. And would the gentleman from Ohio spurn the right of peti tion on this floor, in the capitol of this free Re-, public, and in defence of onesself for personal wrongs ? But to the votes upon the presenta- tiou of this memorial of Mr. Blair. A motion was made by the gentleman from N. Carolina Mr. Mc Kay to refer this memorial, together with a resolution to go into an examination of the whole matter of public printing, and although the yeas and nays were not called on that ques tion, all gtntlemen on this floor that were here then, knew that the Whigs voted against this reference. The question was afterwards taken by yeas nd nays directly on the reference of this petition to a select committee: we find the Democratic, members voting for the reference, a'nd the Whig members against it. Yes, sir, we find recorded in the negative on this question, Mr. B. here read from the journals the names of "Messrs. Adams, Allen, Bond, Dawson," &c. This was the course of these gentlemen at the last session, who are now so anxious for an examination into the subject of the printing of the House, and so desirous to have it given out by contract. Oh, consistency, " what a jewel !" With regard to this matter of giving out the printing by contract, I beg gentlemen to recol lecftrris one fact, that there are but two estab lishments in this city at -present which could possibly do the printing of this House. It re quired, as he had heen informed, an expenditure of some thirty or forty thousand dollars, to pre pare a printing establfshment to do the printing of the House, and rip establishment can do the printing for the House but one of the two exten sive establishments in this city; either it must be done by Messrs. Blair and Rives.or.-by Mes srs. Gales and Seaton, and he hoped in God the rsank of the United States would not again have the benefit of the printing of this House. It was idle to talk in good faith of electing ethers at this time, whatever might "be our feelings of friendship towards them. If gentlemen were disposed to go into this in vestigation in good faith, after the House was organised, he was willing to go with them ; but when he found thenvturning and twisting about as they had been, he was unwilling to trust them. Their course has been so refractory, a,nd imprac ticable, not to say factious, thatI cannot now think of acting with them. Tbejrt efforts all seem to have been to resist the majority of the House, and set at nought the well esiablished principle in ibis country that the, majority shsll. rule.' The principle that the majority shall rule is a well established principle in this country ; and I warn gentlemen not to carry loo far their violent resistance to this principle. Sir, if gen tlemen carry out their resistanceto this principle too far, they will find that the people will rise in their strength, nnd resist them. The people will not, and cannot much longer bear this resi.-tance of the express will of the majority of the nation, as we have daily witnessed. But why this slrug- 1 C . at . 1 . f T T X- A git: lor wits existence oi me unitea st;ues biink i Does the party with which it is identified depend upon this election of Printer of the House o Representatives to sustain their dying, sinking fortunes. No, no, gentlemen, this would avail you but little; year doom is fixed. bir, there is another matter which I desire to notice. An appeal has been made to a party in this House, called the Nulhflers. The Whigs are now under the nece ssity of appealing to th.it party, and their cry is, "help us, Cassius, or we sink." Sir, I make no appeal to any high mind ed and honorable men, as I know the members of this party of Nuilifiers to be, for 1 know they will treat with scorn and contempt all such an- i peals to them. I know them to be a high mind- i ed and honorable set of m?n, and all these ap peals are out insults to their understanding 1 know the character of the constituents that they represent, nnd their feelings would revolt at the idea of giving countenance to such appeals ; they know their doty, and will dare do it. The gen tlemen from Ohio has said that the petition of Mr. Biair came into this House in a very ques tionable shape. In reply to this, I may say that this proposition of the Opposition his" come into this House in a very questionable shape. Let us, sir, go. into a historv of this -thing. Wh;tt has been the history of this country for the last twoyeSrs? Have we not heard it proclaimed in every quarter of this Union, that the party denominated the Whig party, have been antici pating a triumphant victory? Sir, have we not seen, that for several yoars that parly had a tri umphant majority in the b'Miate of the United Slates; yet during all that time they never brought forward nnv of those measures of re trenchment and reform in this department just now attacked by the p.irly here. Sir, why did they not support these measures two years ago, when they were brought to the notice of this House? Why, they did not support them, be cause they all knew that, by n union of the Whigs and Conservatives, their paity would have a majority in this House, and they could elect their favorite public Printer. If there was now the same chance of electing the U. St.-.tes Batik, through its agents Messrs. Gales and Seaton, Printer of this House, you would not hear, doubtless, the first whisper from them of retrenchment and reform inthis department, if we are to judge from their conduct for the last two years. If there was a chance, by Any com binalion that they could pffect, to elect their can didates, all this loud voi'iferaiion would be hush ed up, and you would hean no more from them of retrenchment inJhe expenditures with regard io the pub'ic printing. I judge so, sir, from what hns taken p! ice here, before our eyes, within the last two ye;irs. Sir, I call the attention of the American people to the condition of this Congress and to the proceedings which have taken place here during the present session. Let the peo ple examine for themselves, and see who it is that has delayed the business of Congress by a thou sand little motions to stave off the public busi ness. Let the people examine, and see who it is that has m.ide motion after motion for ad journment, and repealed motions that had been again and agmn decided, and kept the House until' the fourih week of the session without being organized. Let them scrutinize the jour nals of the present session up io this lime; let them see that nineteen-twentieths of such motions have been rmde by these economical, time-saving geutiemen. My friend from Georgia Mr. Dawson had made this motion to postpone the election of a Printer, for the purpose of going into an investigation in regard to a retrenchment in the expenses of printing.' My friend was a member of the lasl Congress, end wras silent as the tomb upon this subject then. Now, I am not disposed to impeach his motives; but the world might sny that he was silent last year because his friends were receiving the benefits of this printing, and he" comes for ward for retrenchment this year, because his friends were not likely to obtain ir I hope such are not the facts, but they will look so to all impartial men. Sir, why- do gentlemen endeavor thus to procrastinate debate, and stave off the busi ness of the country ? Have they not yet been sufficiently rebuked; and that, too, by their own friends, for such a wanton course? Have not honorable and high minded men of their own party become disgusted with their course, nnd declared on the floor that the' would not act with them, if they endeavored longer thus to stave off questions ? Did not the gen tleman from Alabama, Mr. Cracb, and the gentleman from Georgia, Mr. Alford, rise in their places and tell their party, that they would no longer act with them if they did not come to an election of a Speaker? Has not the gentle man from Georgia made a similar declaration at a subsequent period ? And are gentlemen waiting for another rebuke of this kind, from their own friends, before they proceed to the election of a Printer ? They have been told that they were not sent here to act as a fac tion, and, I beliere, by one of their own par ty; and will they, in the "Jace b( the "disgusjt . of their own pari', continue such a course? .; The genlh man from Ohio Mr. Bond has re- ferred to the character of tlie memorial again. ; sent in by Mr. Blair; but h'e had very j'jjdi ciously kept out of sight .ihe most impoif jvf;t ilem of that memorial. Mt'Ssrs.'Blair and lii.s . had paid every doITar of the money in whicy.' Mr. Blair was held as security for Mr-Crockett, the Kentucky postmaster, and the memo rial prayed for an examination into the mut ter, wkh a view of odjusting.it. ' The memo rialist fid not ask that the money which had been paid should be paid back by the Gov ernment to him ; but as theYe were certain funds coining to this postmaster frcm the Govt ernrnent, in the shape of a pension,' the me morialist desired th-t this .money, should bs retained, as an offset to the money which he had paid, if it could b?" done consistently with. , law. . . . ;' '"" Mep Mr. Bond "rose to exph?n. If gentlemen were disposed to debate this pro position, and would fix a day for proceeding to the business of the co :.itry, we would meet them in an argument of the question. But I hope they will agree to let us proceed with the busi ness of the country as speecily as possible. Let the House come, 1 ehtrat it, to a voie on this question, nnd let somtbody be elected Printer of the House. If the United States Bank was tho strongest candidate, let it be elected; if not, let it be given to Messrs. Blair and Rives: but I hope the country will never be duped, as it was duped at the last election, by the election of a man who never did and never could do the public printing. In every part of ihe country, sir, we learn that the public business is suffering for the want of the action of this House. Sir, gentlemen, in my hu:ible apprehension, mistake themselves, if they ihink they can effect any thing more, by keeping up this game of con fusion, disorder, and procrastination, than a most unprofitable consumption of the time of this House, and an enormous waste of the treasures of the pc-ople- If there is any doubting charac ter in this House that the party is after, I should like to know him; bttter that he were not here. I hope lhere is none such in the party to which I have the honor to belong and I kuow of none in the other. No, sir, there are none amongst them; they keep their party too well drilled fur that. Or can it be with a hope of some new combinations being formed, that ihis election is thus fought off with such pertinacity? It is time, sir, thit every eye in this nation should be called to the proceedings of this House, that have transpired within the hist four weeks, to judge how far tlrey have been disreputable to the character of our Government, and how far they have been calculated to impair the confi dence of mankind in ihe excellency of the free form of our Republican institutions. Sir, no in telligent patriot can contemplate such scenes, without alarming apprehensions for the down ward course of this glorious and mighty Repub lic. - . - Gentlemen, in this hurricane of excitement, ennnnt be aware of what they are and have been doing, in their continued efforts on this floor to resist the sovereign will of this great people, ns expressed through their Representatives here. I implore gentlemen to reflect, that w hen we re fuse obedience to the sovereign will of a majori ty of the freemen of this country, the next step lobe taken, is to decide our controversies by the strength and supremacy of arms, to which their course here is continually inviting us. Arc they prepared for ihis, in this early state of the Re public ? Have they lost, so early in the history of our country, all confidence in the decisions of a majority of our people, or does their thirst for power blind them to the train of calamities that would await us? Are they willing lo return, or to force others to fly to that arbiter of violence and arms, to adjust a mere difference of opinion in relation to political principles, a thing that the wisdom ofour fathers was so studious to avoid, on anjr nnd every occasion ? Do honorable gen tlemen here believe for a moment that the free people of this country are So benighted as to tol erate such a course, or-that they have art and talents enough to conceal their conduct on these subjects here, from them on their return amongst them? WTill there not .be thr.se amongst them, the people, who will point to the journals of this Congress for the last four weeks to show the ntfmber of motions lo adjourn made by one par ty of this House, besides mhers r-f tqual, if not of a rnore, frivolous nature ? And are they igno rant how n just, not a factious, people will ap preciate such conduct? Sir, I would say to them, in this wild, maddened career.it is lime, if they have not given up all future hopes, to pause in the future prosecution of this reckless course, and respect more the just understanding of their countrymen. As often as they have deceived themselves in undervaluing the intelligence cf the people, it does seem that the lessons ta-ight them within a few years arid months sine, should induce them, to heed a language that has been so often spo ken to them by whole Slates of this Union; or is it that voice, in the day of their poliiicnl mania, that they arp mostly disposed to treat with disdain and contempt? Sir, I would in voke gentlemen once more to discard these idle dreams of embarrassing: the business of the coun try here for political effect abroad, and let us go to work and discharge the duties we owe as Re presentaiives that we owe to our constituents, ourselves, and the-country ; erery department of the. Government requires it the necessities, of the naiion demand it. In a very severe winter, in which wood began to be scarce in Boston, Governor Winthrop re ceived private information that a neighbor was wont to help himself from the pile at bis door. Does he? said the Governor, 'call him to mo nnd I will taken course with him that shall cure him of Stealing.' The man nppeired, and the Governer nddrpssed him thus: Friend, it is a cold winter, and I hear yon are meanly pro vidd with wood : you are welcome to help your self at my pile till winter is over.' And then merrily asked his friend whether he had not put a stop to the man's stealing ? Put out your tongue n little further,' said a physician to a female patient, 'a little further, ma'm, if you please- a little further still.' Why, Doctor, do you think there is no end to. a wo-' man's tongue? cried the' fair invalid. ir i' ' H l i i J 3 "I. :f. :t. i ? i : - - - i