Search America's historic newspaper pages from 1789-1963 or use the U.S. Newspaper Directory to find information about American newspapers published between 1690-present. Chronicling America is sponsored jointly by the National Endowment for the Humanities external link and the Library of Congress. Learn more
Image provided by: Mississippi Department of Archives and History
Newspaper Page Text
On Oct. 19 I ran in this column excerpts from the MANUAL FOR SOUTHERNERS, an “educational project” of the citizens councils. The part I ran was designed for grades 5 and 6, and was Section 11 of that lesson. A number of letters came in asking if I had written the copy. They wanted to know if it was irony or satire or just what. Well, before Heaven, I didn’t write it; that copy, as well as this today, was taken from the citizens councils monthly paper. Believe me, there is no humor in this, not when you consider there are parents who’ll teach, or let it be taught, to their children. But, alas, no sermon. Herewith is Section 1, grades 5 and 6, taken from the MANUAL FOR SOUTHERNERS: THE SOUTHERN STATES The United States of America is your country, and it has forty-eight states in it. The forty-eight states are grouped into several big sections, or parts. On your map you can find the Northern states, the Eastern states, the Western states, and the Southern states. Georgia, Florida, South and North Carolina, Virginia, Alabama, Tennessee, Arkansas, Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi are some of the Southern states. You will see that they are all right together when you study your map. MANY AMERICAN LEADERS WERE SOUTHERNERS Many of you probably think you live in South America be cause you say you come from the South. But Southerners, or the people from the South, are from “South United States,” and not from South America at all. Some of America’s greatest and most beloved leaders were Southerners, just as you are. EARLY AMERICA WAS RULED BY ENGLAND These Southern men had much to do with making our coun try free and strong. When America was a young nation, or country, it had only thirteen states. These states were between the Atlantic Ocean and the Appalachian Mountains. When you look at your map you will see that our country today is much bigger. The thirteen young states were not free as they are today. They belonged to England, which is a country on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean. Whenever the people wanted to do something back in our early history, they had to ask the King of England first. If the King didn’t want them to do something, he just said “No, you can’t do it,” and they had to mind him, or he would punish them. SOUTH LED THE WAY TO FREEDOM Now, the early Americans got tired of being told what to do by a King in a foreign country. They wanted to be free and to make their own laws. We Southerners were especially tired of the old King of England and his laws. So when men from all thirteen states began meeting together and talking over their problems, many Southern men took the lead to win freedom for America against England. PATRICK HENRY WAS A SOUTHERNER Patrick Henry, A Southerner, who came from Virginia made a speech against the King of England and said to other Ameri cans, “Give me liberty (freedom) or give me death!” Patrick Henry was a brave man to say that in those days. The old king might very well have put him in jail or had him killed. But the brave Southerner said he would rather be free than be a slave to any King. OUR FOREFATHERS WON OUR FREEDOM Finally the men of our country told King George of England that they were going to be a separate country. They told him they were going to make their own laws and run their own business. King George didn’t want to lose the thirteen states. He sent his army over to America to arrest the leaders like (Continued on Page 2) A BOOK REVIEW LILLIAN SMITH KILLERS OF THE DREAM, by Lillian Smith. W. W. Norton, New York. $4.50. In this brilliant and moving work, Lillian Smith recreates the “southern experience." She does this in order to help her fellow southerners, and indeed all men to understand the forces that have led us to “kill the dream" of a democracy in which equality, jus tice and liberty were true terms and not the playthings they have become. Miss Smith illustrates the work with a description of her own growth, of the influences of her childhood in a small southern town, the terrible and poignant polyphony of taboos, manners and exploitation that led to white su premacy. Southerners had been degraded by the Civil War of everything except their whiteness. The Negro became the object of their personal affection and si (Continued on Page 2) LETTERS Cleveland 6, Ohio Dear Mr. East: If there is anything that gives me concern, it is people like Dr. Anderson Jr. who label their own rationalizations as an interpreta tion of God’s word. I am referring to Dr. Anderson’s letter about bomb shelters which you printed in the November 16th. Petal Paper. Dr. Anderson’s opinion about not building a private bomb shel ter is ok with me, but I must ob ject to his conclusion that God is on His side. I myself am in favor of building bomb shelters. Please tell Dr. Anderson that the reason I know God is not on his side is that I have had a direct revelation from Him, and I know He is on my side in this. Sincerely yours, Noah (per) Miss Grace Mehiing. A Report On— THE AGONY of the SOUTHERN MINISTER By RALPH McGILL In the 131-year-old city of Co lumbus, Ga., a town on the bank of the Chattahoochee River with a population of 85,000 whites and 40,000 Negroes, the Rev. Robert Blakely McNeill, 44, endured with faith and patience the slow prog ress of convalescence following a coronary suffered June 10. His severe physical shock came just three days after a spiritual one. A judicial commission of the Southeast Georgia Presbytery had dismissed him from the pastorate of the First Presbyterian Church, its chairman reading the brief, al most curt, notice from the pulpit Mr. McNeill had filled for six and a half years. Seven long months before, the same commission, after a request for a hearing by seven of the congregation, had said that the racial issue was the central one behind the opposition to the pas tor. According to Rob McNeill’s friends, this “Spanish-Inquisition like hostility” was fostered by a hard core of “about fifty church members.” Actually, Rob McNeill, Ala bama-born, Southern-reared and educated, had never once used his pulpit to urge integration. Even his most bitter enemies admit as much. But in an article published in Look magazine in May, 1957, he had advocated a moderate course ui creative cumavi uciwecu uic races as a necessary approach to racial harmony and Christian duty. He emphasized that he rejected sexual and contrived social mix ing. But he also made it plain he had meant that Negroes should, and must, be accepted in the ad ministration of community affairs. From that day on, there were those in his congregation who, for these mild statements, remorse lessly set out to drive him from the church. By June they were appealing to the Presbytery. Statements like these were heard, “No nigger will ever darken the door of the church,” and, “If a nigger comes, I go.” It was even reported that some of the more relentless opponents among the 1,200 professed Chris tians in the congregation were heard to say, on learning of the coronary that brought Mr. Mc Neill close to death, that the Lord finally had “taken care of him.” Others, seemingly dismayed at the possibility that the illness might create sympathy, said, “It’s a fake attack.” However, Rob McNeill was not alone. Members of his congrega tion manned a reception table outside his hospital room in two hour shifts from early morning until late at night, to greet and register visitors and to protect him from intrduers. There were special prayers in hundreds of homes, and his wife and three children, who suffered their share of vile language and death threats by phone, were never without friends. McNeill’s supporters agreed then that he must go to another pas torate, though they longed to con front his opposition in a further church hearing. He was, at the time of his heart attack, consid ering a call to a large Charleston, W. Va., church, but was unwilling to surrender to the malignant forces against him. But now he has accepted. A leader along those who op posed him is quoted as saying, “Now we must find a preacher with the right kind of religion.” This story of Robert McNeill, Christian minister in the Deep South, who sought to have his own life reflect the two great commandments of love as specifi cately designated by his Master, is—save for the heart attack and the drama of his unexpected pub lic firing—not an unusual one in the South. In varying degrees it is shared by all Southern minis ters and priests who have the courage to take even the most moderate of positions on racial in tegration. Pressure from some of the congregational leaders, ostra cism and obstuction, repeated tele phone calls in the dead of night, ugly, whispered filth, threats of violence and death inspired by minds of stewing with God alone knows what evil — these are all part of a pattern familiar to the ministers of Southern churches who try to take the attitude of tolerance required by Christianity, the ethics of Western civilizatioi the Constitution and courts of the United States and their own na tional church organizations. Despite the virulence of the at tacks upon them, these moderate ministers do not, in general, take the position that each church should have a thoroughly mixed congregation. That is not likely to come about in the South any more than it has or will soon in the North; social and economic patterns of community life pre clude it, quite aside from the in tegration controversy. The stand these ministers do take is twofold: First, Christians and Christian churches should, as a matter of principle, be in the forefront of the forces working for racial tolerance and obedience to the law, particularly in the matter of public school integration. Sec ond, as a token of this principle, white congregations should cease to reject the very thought of a Negro crossing the threshold; al though Negroes need not be ad (Continued on Page 2)