Search America's historic newspaper pages from 1756-1963 or use the U.S. Newspaper Directory to find information about American newspapers published between 1690-present. Chronicling America is sponsored jointly by the National Endowment for the Humanities external link and the Library of Congress. Learn more
Image provided by: Mississippi Department of Archives and History
Newspaper Page Text
In The Midlothian Mirror, The Unkindness of Penn Jones— "WE THOUGHT HE WAS DEAD!'' Below is a letter we had con sidered ignoring. We print it now because we feel it illus trates a point worth making. Here is a man once important in the world of journalism His daily column was reprinted in hundreds of American news papers. Here is a man who has taken full and free advantage of the RIGHT of Freedom of the Press. But he has never con sidered in the past, nor in this letter, his DUTY to tell the pub lic the truth. It is more with sorrow than anger that we must point out Pegler has seldom hesitated to print as fact the foulest of rum ours, the crassest of vulgarity. Wiser heads have long observed that he has always jumped from wrong opinion to a much more inaccurate conclusion. For years the American people read this sort of tripe for which Pegler was paid untold sums. Only Quentin Reynolds had the courage to sue Pegler and make him pay for some of his foul writings. In our younger days, this edi tor read Pegler with awe and respect. Now we must agree with a fellow editor who said: “If Pegler liked me, I'd resign from the human race.” LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Rt. 6, Box 292, Tucson, Aug. 1, 1963 Dear Mr. Jones I have just read in Editor and Publisher the story of vour fight with one Seay. You both seem to be punchy but that is beside the point. The E. and P. says Mr. Seay is a “Birchite” and collateral stuff in this incompetent piece of re porting indicates that you called him out for making a speech which you didn't hear. You seem to have acted on hearsay from an imma ture and unqualified witness who got his bigotry against the freedom of the American people from you. Judging by the background in Who’s Who of the judge whom you tried to thrust upon the high school princiapl. I suspect that she was trying to cut herself a slab of vul gar, demagogic publicity and pro mote herself to higher pay. per haps to the Supreme Court. It does not appear that this obscure but inveterate politician has been off the public tit very long in a very 1 long time I would like to know ! how much tax money she has drawn in all her years and how much she has paid in taxes. I note that you produced a docu ment indicating that your adver sary once was convicted and fined for having been present in Demo cratic Party headquarters? Or was it a place of resort like Polly Adler’s in New York which Was the poon-tang parlor patronized for years by the elect of your poli tical party’s White House and cabinet riff-raff? Would you say that you have never been inside such a place or would you take the Fifth? Or would you say you were just waiting for a street car? Even if the answer is “yes” would that disqualify you forever to condemn and oppose traitors in and subservient to the Democratic Party? I remind you that a son of David Lloyd George recently pub , lished a work depicting his old man as the most disgusting old fanny-pincher and chippy-chaser of his time. Still, he won a war for Britain and history paid off on that. Your party’s mahatma tried to We're Still Seen By Others AMERICA'S LITERACY TESTS The other day the Mayor of New York, Mr. Wagner, called for the abolition of literacy tests for city voters, arguing that Spanish was for all practical purposes the sec ond language of the city. Even divorced from any political mo tive the Mayor may have had, his suggestion is significant, for it touches on wider issues, particu larly the enfranchisement of the southern Negro. In New York itself the problem is caused by the vast and con stantly growing population of Puerto Rican immigrants who, be cause they are born American citizens, escape the requirement of the naturalization procedure under which applicants must demon strate “an understanding of the English language.” There are, of course, enclaves of Chinese, tlal ians, and others who inherited their citizenship or were never naturalized and who speak barely any English, but their numbers have declined since the war. The days are gone when whole com munities spoke nothing but Ital ian, Polish, German, or Greek. Only the Spanish speakers — the Puerto Ricans in New York and the Mexicans in the South—sur vive as a noticeable challenge to America’s powers of absorption. Local politicians are now used to wooing them in their own lan guage, and parts of New York at election time might be mistaken for a Latin country. Mayor Wag ner would accept this, and his reasons are understandable, hut ■ there Is a good case on the other side. Voters who do not learn the language of their country must form their judgments in the dis torting mirror of any faction that takes the trouble to woo them. A broader perspective is almost in evitably denied them. However, merely to maintain the literacy tests is to maintain injustice in the southern states, where they have long been used as a deliberate means of excluding Negroes from the polling booths. Elaborately framed questions that would taxe the brightest intellects are put to Negro applicants, while whites are registered with the bar est formalities. Most efforts to tackle this problem have been thwarted by invoking the consti tutional right of states to lay down their own qualifications for vot ers, and also by pointing to New York as a place where the effect would be to enfranchise voters without a knowledge of English. The solution to both problems appears to be contained in the Civil Rights Bill that President Kennedy vainly put before Con gress last March. It would have laid down that in Federal elections completion of sixth grade school ing (normally achieved at about twelve years of age) would con I stitute a presumption of literacy. This, if passed, would prevent states from manipulating the lit eracy tests for special purposes but would also ensure the voters were in a position to assess the issues on which they had to pro nounce—The Times (London) score on his wife’s pretty younj; secretary way back in the Firs! War and he was still flaring his nostrils like a stallion at this same female as he sat beside him wher he dropped dead. His wife, as usual, was a thousand miles away lam not a member of the Bird | Society. I m too fr to the right I But I qualify for membership, be cause, unlike you Democrats. I no' only swear to support the Consti tution but try constantly to main tain it against ignorant Demo cratic dolts who pawn their poli tical patrimony for handouts ant oaltry little medals. Somebody wrote a book which was published under Bobby Ken nedy’s name called “The Enemj Within.” I wondered “Has this character turned square at last’ because the Democratic Party is the enemy within. But it turned cut that he was rewriting dis closures which I made many year* ago as an honest reporter aboui the predatory union which art subsidiaries of your party—anc his. Ho did not include the Federa judiciary among these enemies bm I do not expect truth of am Kennedy. Do you seriously believe Demo era 1& snouia oe allowed to vote'. Or even breathe? Last year Colby College in Maine hung a card board medal on an ole crud over in California for his great courage in blasting the Birch Society. But all the firey crosses that have been burned in all these years were burned in Democratic country. We had a big lynching in Waco when I was a young reportei in Dallas and they burned the body. How many Republicans dc you reckon there were in Waco ir 1915? There is no charge that any Birch people shot tear gas at law. abiding citizens, including co-eds at Ol’ Miss. That was done by your low-browed, droopy-eyec Democratic president and his brother with the chipmunk face. God you Democrats scare easy Don’t be afraid, Buster. We won’! slap your face. You used millions of pickets to try to scare me but 1 held still. But your low-browec fuehrer tossed out the phrase “Gel moving” and brother, you had better. We are going to run you down the road. Sincerely, Westbrook Pegler The Empty Pew (Continued from Page 1) in people. There are so many who have kind hearts and gentle natures. There are those who really do forgive the injuries we j all collect in our daily living Some people enjoy doing kind j things for others. Why do we deny our own good ness? Why do we have to have a “season” or some other excuse for doing good things? Why do we invent a non-existent character to blame the goodness on? Maybe this is what Christmas does for us: it steals away the credit for the goodness that men do. No big fat fraud will get credit for the good ness that has been done for me. 1 will not write my gratitude to the North Pole. I want to express it to the people whom I see every day doing wonderful things for others. I’m glad I went through this season with rose - colored glasses on. I saw the goodness in people and I was delighted by it. Andi 1 thought, if only they were not ashamed of their own kindness and love. I am not ashamed of it I am grateful to them for it. The only thing that keeps us from halving Christmas 365 days a year is waiting for Santa Glaus. Journal Of A Trip South (Continued From Page 3) you don’t talk or try to create some understanding?” “They think they do under stand.” he said. “They under , stand just what they want to . . At four, Father had a confirm ; ation class in the rectory. I strolled about outside, visited the church again. When I stepped out of the church. I saw P. D. East, an old friend, famed editor of the Petal Paper, getting from his car. He had driven over to visit me from , Hattiesburg, Mississippi. We went into the back door of the rectory and remained in the kitchen with cups of coffee. Father came into the kitchen, his face blank with puzzlement. Who was this white man with the Mississippi car licence? Had trouble already struck? P. D. looked his sourest and said: . “Father, I’m from the Mississippi Klan and we want this mingling CUT OUT.” Father glanced at me. I “It’s UNCHRISTIAN, don’t you know that,” P. D. continued. I quickly introduced them. Father wanted his confirmation class to meet us, so we went into the front room of the house and talked. Father invited P. D. to spend the night, but we decided that no small southern town should be asked to tolerate both of us over night. “And besides, John makes me so nervous,” P. D. added. “I never know when he’s going to start taking those damned pills and turning black.” (Referring to the medication I took when I toured the South as a Negro.) , We felt that it would be too risky to go out to anyone’s house for supper that night, after I had been seen around town, and especially now that P. D. had ap peared on the scene with his Mississippi licence plates. One of the young men in the confirmation class insisted on providing the supper. He left and soon returned with an im mense steak, a watermelon and salad greens. I cooked and the three of us had supper in the kitchen before P. D. drove away. NIGHT The tensions are tangible. Each time the phone rings, both Father and I go because if it is the Klan, both of us want to hear what is said. The phone does ring, again and again. Each time it is one of his parishioners, calling to make surd everything is all right with us. Father prolongs the conversations, and I am glad he does, because so long as the phone is tied up, we cannot receive the calls we ex pect . .. and dread. Certainly, we feel it is time for me to leave. TUESDAY We left early this morning for visits to Baton Rouge and an evening lecture in Lafayette. Also a radio interview on an independ ent station. The commentator promised me that I could say anything I please, and that noth ing would be deleted from the broadcast. j We finally returned here long after midnight. Now, at four a m. I prepare to retire. I am going back to Mansfield tomorrow. WEDNESDAY Driving out of the little town, two police cars picked me up at the outskirts and accompanied me, one in front, one behind, to the next town. There, another “team” took over and accom panied me on to the next. What does it mean They did not explain, did no„t stop me. But each time I slowed, they slowed; each time I accelerr ated, they accelerated. I did not feel that they were protecting me, but rather that they were making sure I left this area. Police are as bigoted as anyone else in such localities. . > They accompanied me halfway across the State. (RAMPARTS) Badly Needed, An Item Called— FAITH The trouble with the right-wing movement in this country is that the ultra conservatives have little faith in our system of government. They continually preach the I gospel that it is subversive to talk disarmament with communist | leaders because we cannot trust them and they are certain to get j the better of us over the bargain ing table. We do not trust communist leaders either but we fail to see what will be gained by refusing to discuss the possibility of peace ful coexistence. The alternative is war, and this would make ideological argument academic. The survivors of a nuclear con flict would be too busy remaining alive to worry about which type of government was guiding their destinies. We are not convinced that be cause the communists are dedicat ed to their ideology there is no hope of persuading them that war must be outlawed, or that in do ing so we would lose the battle for men’s minds. Through the forum of the United Nations we have as much opportunity as our enemy to convince the world that our system of government is superior. Americans with abiding faith in our destiny have no hesitation in engaging in open debate with the ■ puppets of the Kremlin or in working and praying.for peace. *■ 1 Our strongest weapon is the freedoms we preach, and our greatest weakness is our failure to practice those freedoms, particu larly in the area of civil rights. Here is where the communists could be put to rout if we would put our mind to it.—The Suffolk County News. A BOOK REVIEW (Continued from Page 1) not sympathy from his wife), Surely he will be forced to make a decision? No, he seeks the ad vice of his former roommate. Structurally, the story comes full circle. When Peter Copeman goes to another party, in borrowed trousers, hoping to meet a girl, the reader envisions for the non-hero ! continuous revolutions of the circle. In his first novel, Victor Young, himself a schoolteacher in Eng land, has pictured the little fellow of the middle class, who always gets pushed around, even trampled. He is likeable, but not particularly admirable. He will never change the system; he is too much bound by it. because he is a non-hero. (L. E. BALLARD). Support Our Advertisers