Newspaper Page Text
Russia has 150 regiments of mounted Cossacks. As a result of the exchange of shots between opposing Chinese in Baker alley early yesterday morning Louie Sing and Louie Lee of the four fami lies and Louie Poy and Kum Chin of the Louie family were booked at the City Prison yesterday afternoon on ;«. charge of assault to murder. The warrants were sworn to Before Police Judge Cabanisa by a member of each of the rival factions, each claiming that the other did the shooting. The trouble was over a girl inmate of a house on Baker alley. Girl Leads to Shooting. cf .Education it was ascertained yes .vrday thai there has been a falling eff- in the average daily attendance of pupils in the public schools during lan.moi'th as Compared vrith the pre vious month. In January the attend sr^re. was 39.345, while in February it was 37.S31. a decrease of 1314. The number of pupils enrolled in •41 classes in February was 41.153; •••vcrage daily attendance, 37,631. The class attendance in high s.' h on l« uj»s 29.9: commercial schools, " f| : primary and grammar, 45.9: eve-n ir.c-, C7.4. - The average attendance per class for the whole department T.as 40.2. There are row three classes of deaf and dumb pupils, the average daily attendance "being 23 and the number errolled 2S.'- •_; I>urans ' February &7.S31 Scholars Were Taught J>aily, as Against ". ."9.313. fn the Previous Month. .. .From fitrares compiled by the Board ATTK.VBANCE OF TCPILS SHOWS A FALWNG OFF Papers in the dead man's possession show he was a member of Amity Lodge Xo. 8. Knights of Pythias, at Reno, Xev., and that Sister Anne de Marie of the Convent of Our Lady of the Sacred Heart in Oakland was bta sister. His bank book shows a goodly sum of money to hl3 credit in the Ne vada Bank. He was a married man. L. F. J. Wrinkle, a mining nun from Thebe. Inyo County, was found dead yesterday afternoon alongside his bed on the floor of his room in the Grand Hotel. He engaged a room in that hotel on March 17. Death is be lieved to have been due to natural causes. Body of L. Wrinkle Found Lying on the Floor of Bedroom Several Hours After Death. MIXER OF IXYO DIES SCDDEXL.Y IN" A HOTEL, Mrs. Dunning, but the attempt was a t failure. Dr. W. G. Wilson followed to testify ; that Mrs. W. W. Barnes, who, as Mrs. ! Price, was landlady in 1S98 of the Vic- 4 toria Hotel, was ill in bed and unable { to answer a subpena. It may become 1 necessary to hold a session of the trial 1 at her bedside in order, to secure her | testimony. j Then came Kytka with his photo graphic enlargements of writings, ad mitted and contested, and the fun be gan. In addition to the large screen j was a smaller one bearing enlarge- | ments of the note inclosed in the can- ' dy box, reading, "With love to your- j self and baby, Mrs. C." and an admit- j tedly genuine exemplar of Mrs. Bol- j kin's handwriting with the words, "Would that I could see you, my love." i Knight fought exceedingly hard to have these enlargements ruled out of court and was unwilling that they be put to the use of illustrating what the handwriting expert wished to ex plain. MAKES FUTFLE PROTEST. "There is no reason." he protested, ; "why this courtroom should be turned into a photograph gallery for the pur pose of illustrating something that is not and never can be in evidence." During the discussion over the ad* missibility of the photographs Knight referred to Byington as "Lady Bying-: ton," but the District Attorney ignored the taunt and thus avoided a spat. Judge Cook finally ruled that the pho tographs might*be used for illustration and Kytka continued his testimony. He said that he had made photo graphic enlargements of all the writings in the case and examined them micro scopically. He identified the wrapper on the box of candy as the one sub mitted to him previous to the first triel. All the other writings were shown to him in turn and he rum maged among the luggage he had brought with him and found the cor responding photographs and negatives. In producing them he incurred Knight's anger, who claimed^ that "by a simple twist of the wrist" -the witness was exposing the photographs to the jury. The court said that was improper and warned the witness. Under questions from the District Attorney, Kytka explained the en largements on the screen of the fifty six exemplars of defendant's hand writing and the corresponding selec tions from the disputed writings. His testimony was full of technical ex pressions. "Hooks," "loops," "termin als," "character," "construction," "in itial point," and various other phrases flowed from him freely and , he traced I the resemblances with his pointer. More damaging to the defendant than the expert's explanation was the view the Jury had of the enlargements, which showed to a" startling degree a similarity between Mrs. Botkin's ad mitted handwriting and the penman ship of the note in the candy box and the address on the wrapper. When Kytka was asked to point out the similarity of the handwriting on the wrapper of the candy box and that of the two anonymous letters he said it was so evident that to explain it Would be a waste of time and he passed the two over to the jury. CROSS-EXAMIN'ATION*. Knight took the expert in hand for cross-examination about 3 o'clock in "Did you not call on Sam Short ridge and offer your services in the Dillard case and when they were re- Another storm broke. Byington objected and Knight said he would prove the substitution by Oscar Tolle, formerly clerk in Judge Cook's court. Kytka was. shouting "He's crazy, crazy, crazy," and showing in pantomime with his hands what he thought about the brain matter concealed under Knight's scanty, gray hair. The Judge warned him that he would fine him for contempt if he made any similar comments. At one stage of the examination Knight asked that Kytka be disquali fied because he was evidently unfair. Judge Cook dismissed the motion con temptuously. Kytka was asked if he ever solicited employment from attor neys and if he was not willing to take any side of a case provided he got a fee.. He answered in the negative. "As a matter of fact did you not substitute for some of the genuine ex hibits others of your own manufac ture?" "Xo. sir." yelled the witness. THE STOHM BREAKS. "Xo, sir." said Kytka, "I never prosecute or persecute anybody." The witness was asked if he had ever secured some of the exhibits and answered that he had by an order of the court and with Knight's permis sion*. « not been hired by the police to prose cute the case. "Isn't it a fact that the jury ac quitted him on twenty-nine counts on which you testified that he committed fc-rgery and only convicted him on one charge, and with that you had nothing to do?" The witness started to explain, and Knight demanded an answer, "yes" or "no." Byington interposed with an ob jection, and'judge Cook ruled that the matter was not relevant. "Were you an expert in the James E. Davis case?" asked Knight. "I was your expert," said the wit ness. "Were you right 'or wrong in that" case?" "I was right, and nobody knows it better than you." "I don't know anything of the kind," snapped Knight. "Were you a witness in the Piper will contest and didn't you pronounce the will a forgery?" "I did. It was a rank forgery." "And Chief Lees came to you with the inkjgtill wet on the will?" OBJECTION" INTERPOSED. An objection was interposed, which relieved the witness from answering the question. "You were a witness In the Becker case, weren't you?" asked Knight. "I was and he went across the bay and broke rock." . "Well, didn't you testify that he had painted in the body of the check with a brush?" ; • Again Byington interposed an objec tion, and then the storm broke. "I want to show," roared Knight, "that this man is unqualified as an expert. Why, everybody knows that in the Becker case he made a monkey of himself and was the laughing stock of the community." ''On the contrary,"' shouted Assistant District Attorney Ferral, "Becker con fessed that he did paint in the body of the check." Kytka was talking at the same time, and Judge Cook, red ] and angry. - was endeavoring to get a hearing. Finally he succeeded. "Mr. Knight," he . said, "this thing has gone far enough. If you make any more, of these kind of remarks I'll send you to jail." During the hush succeeding this dec laration Knight arose to his feet and asked. on what grounds he had' been threatened with imprisonment. "Because the remarks you make are entirely improper," - said the Judge. "Then why allow the District Attor ney to : make them?" "He is at- fault also, and I'll send you both to jail on a repetition of the offense.". . Knight asked-the witness if - he had the afternoon and the audience was given three-quarters of an hour res pite from the ennui into which the dry routine of testimony had plunged it. Knight"-began-suavely-by inquir ing how Kytka went about his. Work when a specimen of handwriting was submitted to him to be examined as to genuineness. The witness explain ed that he picked out all the points in the case, weighed them one against another and then came to a conclusion. "In all the examinations you made of these writings in this case." asked Knight, "did you find a single point in favor of Mrs. Botkin?" "At first I did," was the answer. "I found ten or fifteen, but on examining the writing further I discovered that these points were the result of an attempt at disguising her handwriting and that the genuineness of it was un doubted." "Were you an expert in the Dillard case?C "I was, and he was convicted." "On your testimony?" "Yes." HANDWRITING EXPKttT KYTKA AND SOME OF HIS ENLARGEMENTS OF ADMITTEDLY GENUINE WRITING BY MR?. I EOTKIN AS COMPARED WITH OTHER CHAPAfTERS IN THE DISPUTED DOCUMENTS. THE LINE "B" IS THU I ADMITTED WRITING AND "X' IS THE DISPUTED WRITING. ' ¦Lot t;2xl22. witb a threc-siery residence, at 2417 Howard street, east line. 101:9*i feet south of Twentieth street. $11,300: lot and house at 1312 Pine street. w«t of Hyde. $5C00: lot and two-story frame building at S22 Turk street, east of Goush. the lot being 38:9x 137:6 feet, for S12.30O: Nos. 3114. 311* and 3118 Fitlmcre etreet. east line, 53 feet south of Greenwich. lot S2:CxS2:'i, and Improve ments, for *.'5"5O: No. 2t>>7 Pine street, lot 22:taS7:»5. and two-story house. $0300: four low on the west line of Forty-seventh avenue. ICO south of K street, for $4C0 each for three and $420 for nne. This property, with other parcels, was purchased forty-five years ago by the two Joseph brothers, and after the Fraser River excitement the broth ers retired to England and have never visited San Francisco since. One of the members of A. J. Rich & Co. visited England last year and succeeded in inducing them to part with one of their hold ings for .eighty odd thousand dol lars, purchasing the same for Simon Clayburgh. It is a small piece 20 feet by 100 feet, on the south side of Geary street and adjoining the build ing now ocjeupied by S. & G. Gump. It was at that meeting in England that these negotiations were started for the Kearny-street holding. The same firm only a few months ago were the agents wben the Stolle brothers, who like wise held their Kearny-street holding for thirty-five years, sold their forty six feet by eighty to Frank Maskey for $250,000. Easton. Eldridge & Co.. at their regular auction, which was held yes terday, sold city properties as follows: The Kearny-street interests will be served by one of the most substantial improvements "yet erected on that street, amounting to the sum of $700,000. The firm of A.' J. Rich & Co. have been negotiating for two years and have finally succeeded in securing from the Joseph brothers of London. England, their holding on the east line of Kearny street, just adjoin ing the Chronicle building, to the north. This has a frontago of 66 feet by almost a uniform depth of 75 feet. The purchase was made for a corporation, a client of the Union Trust Company of San Francisco, and its intention is to erect a twelve-story steel and stone structure, plans of which are being prepared. The build ing will cost about $350,000. will be fireproof, and will follow very much in the lines of the Exchange Court building, plans of which were brought back by one of the firm on his recent visit to Xew York. Joseph Brothers Part With Kearnjr- Strcet Holdings They Have Pos sessed for Many Y'ears. LARGE DEAL. EFFECTED FOR CENTRAL PROPERTY During Kytka's direct and cross examination Mrs. Botkin was worked up to a highly nervo.us state and fre quently her emotion found vent in rapid speech with her attorneys. She watched the elaborate tracings of the expert anxiously as he pointed out the similarity between her own writing and that of the disputed instruments and was evidently relieved when his examination was concluded. Daniel T. Ames, another handwrit ing expert, was the last witness of the day. His testimony was practically a repetition of Kytka's. delivered in a less interesting fashion and without the exciting features of the proceeding witness. He will be cross-examined this morning. jected sell yourself to the other side?" ".\o, sir; that's a lie," protested the witness. "Even If Shortridge says it so?" "I don't care who says it's so; it's a lie." Dunning testified that. Mrs. Corbally came to live with himself and wife on California street at his wife's invita tion and that the two women were close friends. Knight tried to draw the inference that Mrs. Corbally's interest in Dunning might have prompted her to send the box of poisoned candy to "Never," said Dunning. After Hosmer had finished Attorney Knight startled everybody by calling for John P. Dunning, whom he wished to examine further. Dunning appeared in court in his usual nonchalant man ner and was questioned closely in re gard to his relations to Mrs. Corbally, from whom he had testified he bor rowed $SGO at one time. He said he had often accompanied her to the Palace baths and had drunk with her in cafes. Knight wanted to know what kind of a bathing suit Mrs. Corbally wore and whether the swims were taken In day time or at night. It developed that the bathing suit was of the regulation style and that swims -were indulged in both day and night. Dunning admitted that he sometimes paid Corbally's life insurance premium, generally with money given him by, Mrs. Corbally. " "Did you ever pay it with money given you by Mrs. Botkin?" asked Knight ~ \ John A. Hosmer, who, in' 1898, was Assistant District Attorney and took a leading part in the conduct of the first Botkin trial, was the first witness called. He was asked in regard to the so-called "Budd" and "Price" letters and some signatures on money orders cashed by Mrs. Botkin, and he testified that at the first hearing of the case Attorney Knight, on behalf of his cli ent, had admitted these to be in her handwriting. Attorney McGowan bitterly fought the admission of this .testimony, main taining that no admission of Knight's prejudiciaUto the interests f of the de fendant could be used against her. Judge Cook took an opposite view and on the testimony of Hosnaer admitted the writings in evidence as exemplars of -defendant's handwriting. The "Budd" letter is one written to Gov ernor Budd by Mrs. Botkin asking for assignment as a nurse with the troops going to the Philippines, and the "Price" • letter is one written from Healdsburg by the defendant to" the landlady of the Victoria Hotel in this city. KXIGHT STARTLES CROWD. Kytka's cross-examination was one of the diverting features of the trial. Dur ing it there were frequent passages between the witness and Attorney Knight, and when these reached a cli max and Assistant District Attorney Ferral attempted to sit in the game. Judge Cook lost his temper altogether and threatened to send both attorneys to jail and to impose a fine for con tempt on the" witness. This threat brought quiet for a little while, but the trouble broke out in spots all during the cross-examination of the hand writing expert. "The usual demand for admittance to the proceedings kept four policemen busy regulating the crowd and pre venting the courtroom from becoming insufferably crowded. During the after noon session one woman fainted and was carried out by a policeman. She was revived in the corridor with some difficulty and went home. She gave her name as Mrs. Evans and her address as 408 Stockton street. • To illustrate the ground upon which he based his opinion, Kytka had taken fifty-six exemplars of admittedly genu ine Botkin chirography and enlarged them photographically. Beneath these he placed similar letters or words from the disputed writings and exhibited them on a screen about fourteen feet tall and six feet wide. With a broken horsev.hip for a pointer he showed the jury the similitude between the ex emplars and the disputed writing in the formation of the letters, the spacing, divisions between certain let ters and other characteristic marks that gave him the basis for his opinion. The enlarged photographs were al lowed for the purpose of illustration only, after a vigorous objection by At torney Knight on behalf of the defense, and Judge Cook cautioned the jury that they were not to be .i^garded as evi dence in anv way. DIVERTING FEATURE. In connection with other circum stantial evidence that connects the de fendant with the crime are the address on the wrapper of the box of bonbons, a note contained in it and two anony mous letters written to Mrs. Dunning telling her of the relations existing be tween her husband and Mrs.« Botkin. Exemplars of Mrs. Botkin's hand writing which are admitted to be genu ine have been introduced in evidence and Theodore Kytka, the handwriting expert, has made an exhaustive analy sis and comparison of the various specimens of handwriting. He was on the stand yesterday and gave it as his unqualified opinion that the hand that penned the address of Mrs. John P. Dunning on the wrapper of the bcx of candy, that wrote the note contained in the box and that indited the two anonymous letters was the same that wrote the '"Budd" and "Price" letters, so called, which are admittedly the genuine handwriting of Mrs. Cordelia Botkin. The biggest gun of the prosecution was fired yesterday in the retrial of Mrs. Cordelia Botkin for the murder of Mrs. John P. Dunning in August, 1S9S. Mrs. Dunning and her sister, Mrs. Joshua D. Deane. died from the effects of eating poisoned candy, which was sent to the former at Dover, Delaware, from this city, and Mrs. Botkin was accused of having sent the candy for the purpose of ridding Dunning of his wife. Th.* trial of Lieutenant Frederick B. N»ii5rn. who Is accused of ; duplicating his fay account*, was resumed before the court-martial at the Presidio yes t<-r3ay afternoon at. 2 o'clock.. The time v «.« devoted entirely to listening to *.»5tLrT:eny introduced to show that the «>fendant had always borne the repu tation cf being- cf upright character and that his relatives were people of high and honorable standing in the • <-rnii:unity in -which they lived and were 'at the same time in affluant cir cumstances. A strong fight is .being made bjr his attorneys, David Lewi? and H. C. Pillsbury, to retain for him his henor and position in the army. From the testimony offered it would appear that the defense Intends to show :Ji*t in- the alleged issuance of the du£&ca*te pay account. by the defendant there was no criminal act intended; tiiat s .t w>is the accident of negligence • •n;h"is part, and that no attempt was • y.ad" to"d«»fraud the Government. < *oion>l Xi T . E. Birkhimer testified that ih£ had served under him in tne Philippines in th'e Twenty-eighth r Volunteers, and he had found him an /•fficjent. courageous and valiant offi < er; in fact, hr> thought so much of html that he had assisted to get him a commission in the" regular army. He Stated that while Neiison was Collector /•f.thf> Pnrt at Taal he conducted that .rr7W>»-Tvith entire satisfaction. "Tiintvas Robins, *a wealthy merchant .cf Philadelphia who happens to be : h*re "at this time. testifiM' as follows: I tiM.vJL kr.own the accused and his funrfly all 'rry life. They are people • : prominence in Philadelphia. They arc in af9uant circumstances. His two bn.-thers. \V. a*hd R. Neilson, are much older than the lieutenant and have al vays acted toward him fn the most kin^.y and fatherly fashion. If he re <;u J r«»d assistance from them he hid only to ask for it. and it would be granted." Lieutenants Leigh Sypher and S. A. ' Price both testified that they had prrved with th«» defendant in the Phil ippines, and both swore that in 'ail their dealings with him he had been an ex- Trplary officer. * Court adjourned at 5 o'clock to con vene again to-day at l;30 p. m., when further testimony of' a similar char acter -will be introduced in the defend ant's behai"f. The answer denies that the contract mentioned gave or pretended to "give an exclusive right to supply water to the people of Santa Rosa, and that the city had no power or authority to make a contract cenf erring an exclusive priv ilege. It is averred further that the complainant violated its contract by furnishing ' # fetid. disgusting and un wholesome water," and that the water had been condemned by the Board of Health in 1S91 as '"a serious menace to the lives of the people." It is recited also that the complain ant violated its contract by refusing to- supply water for fire purposes free of charge to the city. It Is then set tip that the whole matter In contro versy was decided in favor of the city by the Superior Court of Sonoma Coun ty on May 4, 1S97, and hence the stat ute of limitations hns run against the corporation. United States Circuit Judge Morrow yesterday tock under advisement the suit of the Santa RoSa Water Works against the city of Santa Rosa. The complaint was filed on November 1. 1S39, and it asked that the city be perpet ually enjoined from operating a munic ipal system of water works. The complaint recites that cm Febru ary *. 1874, the complainant entered into a contract with the city of Santa Rosa to supply the Inhabitants with water for the period of fifty years; that in pursuance of such contract the complainant put a system of works in operation and expended $175,000 there upon. It is averred that en April 4, 1S93, Mayor E. P. Woodward approved an ordinance authorizing the city to con struct a rival system of water works and that the system was inaugurated later and the inhabitants of Santa Ro?a were supplied by the city with water free of all cost to them. The com plainant avers that by this action of the municipality the value of complain ant's property has been greatly dimin ished and its ability to borrow money destroyed. It is contended that the city by becoming a competitor in the water field has violated its contract with the complainant, and that the complainant should not be taxed on its property fer the purpose of support in? the rival water works. Says. Mrs. Botkin Addressed Box of Candy. Officers of Hi<rh Standing Swpar to Previous Good Imputation of Defendant Corporation Holds That Franchise Is Exclusive for Term of Fifty Years MAKES STRONG FIGHT dudgeCookWarns Attorneys to Behave. OBJECTS TO OPPOSITION Points Out Simi larity Between Exemplars. Kytka Testifies as an Expert in the Matter. Lieutenant Xeilson Claims He Had >~o Intention of Cheating the Government Judge Morrow AVill Decide Whether That City May Conduct a Rival System NO CRIMINAL ACT INTENDED WATER CONTEST IN SANTA ROSA PROSECUTION IN THE BOTKIN TRIAL INTRODUCES EVIDENCE BEARING ON DEFENDANT'S HANDWRITING THE SAN FRANCISCO CALL', WEDNESDAY. MARCH 30. 1904. 7 DOAN'S KIDNEY PILLS. KEsaBEaesgEgiDganBi3BgP3EEDaagBBBaffrB3B3gBa«»aaaBanngHaagagBBPnii3a3Baa BO : ; ; Og B ¦ ¦ " ¦ ¦ ' ' - ¦ ¦ n ¦ KSan Francisco Backs i —-—.---—H^^-IMMMiMHpMpM^MgMMBHMfai * H BJBBBJBflHIIBBJBBjB^BflflB^^BBO^HHnBBEflHBVMHBBfl^ B ¦ I. - . ._----.-¦¦..» ¦• ."¦* I H Most San Francisco people have bad backs. a Some suffer severely from backache pains, others have attacks that harass, s annoy, but seem not serious. Many grievous mistakes come through back a neglect. The apparent weakness which causes every little strain on the back, m every cold, every exertion to bring backache pains, is a tell-tale warning from u the kidneys. The kidneys are overworked, they become congested, and if you " do not relieve them, urinary disorders follow — Diabetes — Dropsy — Bright's ¦ Disease. Doan's Kidney Pills not only, cure the backache, but cure the kid- B neysof every complication that attacks them. - » B ¦j - - A I mi n I I « f* O pk " I f Sao Francisco Proof J ""J" m " I m B. Edgecomb of 934 Mission st. says: "I knew from the Bl^^SVK/flf/J^X^^S 2 q condition and the action of the secretions from my kidneys that ra Vlft J Ws, ||i§|§ n |1 those organs were not doing their work completely or as satis- y$k *£'*£«.**»££»«*' U n factorily as I w-ished. I tried different medicines, but without »..« r .-~ — — •»»»»-« — ¦ any effect or if any it was so unappreciable that I could not "*" E ; n 2 notice it. . It was different with Doan's Kidney Pills. They do *•<>— — — g H • not act on the bowels, but act directly upon the kidnevs, sooth- «t*ti^ — • „ ¦ ing, strengthening and purifying them so that they. perform gT^n — *£5!^.&JL ii*^ g ¦ their functions properly." "*****• I O Don't Miss This Bargain. Four-fold screens, heavy frame with grill top, in oak or mahogany, filled with, imported French taffeta or bur- laps, 7 feet wide, 6 feet high; installment price 58.50; our retiring sale price $4.00.' Pattoslen Company, corner Sixteenth and Mission. streets. - ¦ ...,••. ADVESTISEMENTS. Two Ways Ha\c you noticed a difficulty in breath- fnc — short, quick breath — when you are walking, poingr upsta.irs, singing, or are anijry and excited? You may not think what this means, but doctors will tell jou it means weak heart action. Take Dr. Miles' New Heart Cure at It will strengthen and build up the weakened nerves and muscles of the heart, and make it strong and healthy. Th!« is one way — the right way. Neglect a littl* while and you will then notice Fluttering, Palpitation. Diz- ziness, Faint!njrSp*ns. Pain in region of heart, side and shoulders. Stomach and kidney troubles. This Is serious. It is th* other way — the wrong way. Dr. Miles' Heart Cure Is a 6a fe, sure remedy, and i» curing H^art disease right along, as -thousands will testify. **I had enlargement of the heart. The doctors said I could live but a short time. I took Dr. Miles* New Heart Cure, which restored me to perfect health." — A. M. BASSETT. V.'cllington. Ohio. Money back if flrst bottle fails to ben- efit. #% fins #% Ammunition. Hnntlnc and RSI 11 I W" Sportier Goods. Larg*«t Ml | i\H rtoek. Lowest I rice*. Send II i P BlHV I iCT catalogue- UyEu %J EHREVE &. BARBER CO.. W ¦ ¦ Ta> Mark*t «t. and C21 Ke&rojr st. |ASTHMANOLA| Is tie osly ear* for xrerross and Bronchial ASTHMA. • Your Dnyr»iet or at 1.93 HAiCiHT ST.. Ean Francisco. Cat \ Weak Men and Women SHOIXD USE EAMIAXA BITTERS. THE j Great Uexlcan Remedy; gives health and •tn r.£th to texus.1 organs. Depot. 223 Market. DIRECTORY VCF RESPONSIBLE HOUSES. l&i&loffue &nd Price Lisu HaUal , . . on Application. : . , ¦• FSESE ASS SALT MEATS. ' IA^ RflYF^ & ffl' SWPP** 5 * Butchers. 108 JA3. PUIEJ g WU. Clay. Tel. M»n 1»4 OILS. ~~~ LUBRICATING OILS; LEONARD & ELLIS. «K Froat st.. g. r. Phone Mala 1719. ¦ PBXBTX2TG. ' EC HTlfiffF^ PRINTER.