Newspaper Page Text
2 Spring Valley's Impudent and Insincere Plea for City Coin and Surrender in Rate Case *T*HE Spring Valley water company has asked; 1 the city to confess judgment in the water rate suits now pending in the' United States court, but Assistant City Attorney Baggett declares he will not consider such a proposition until he is instructed to do so by the mayor and the board of supervisors. /t/ t to do people who would feel an assess- I Hit .of 75 cents a share much less an the stock holders of the Fireman's nd insurance company felt an asseSs >nt of $300 a share for instance; or in the stock holders of the Pacific gas d electric company felt an assess •nt of $10 a share, just laid: or than c stock liolders of the California in rance company wherf tlte* were lied upon to pay an assessment of ) per cent oh their stock. While the Spring Valley waver com ,...ny is appealing to the city to put up all the coin needed to help it out of a hole, regardless of the financial mis fortunes that have fallen upon the municipality and not caring if the en lire burden that belongs to itself is shifted upon the rate payers and tax payers, it is fair to inquire whether the company is itself moved by generosity in its dealings with the public. COMPANY CLAIMS IXTEREST •r- Annually it is set up in the United . States circuit court in this city, in the proceedings brought to prevent the city from putting into effect its water rate ordinances that the company is entitled to interest on the property, taxes and an income to the stockholders. The amount of money that must have come from water" rates in payment of inter est, if the water company has its own way. must depeud upon the valuation of the property. On January 1. 1903, ih* company, taking its own figures, estimated the actual cost of the works at $36,256,235.70. These are the figures contained in the bill filed by the com pany in the United States circuit court. This cost was provided for according" to the following schedule: Sale of stocks and invested earnings. $22,281,235.20; sale of bonds. $13,975,000; total, $3G,- Th«- bonded indebtedness was then, according to the company's showing, $13.!«75,000: the capital stock was $14,- j 000,000. Since then the company, to j tnpei a new bond issue, has doubled the j <:apital stock and distributed the new | stock among its I.SOO stock holders. It was necessary to double the stock, it • Is explained, to comply with the Call- 1 fornia law, which provides that the j stock issue shall be equal to the issue j of bonds. But no new value 'was I created by doubling the stock while twice the old amount of shares come into existence to call for earnings whenever a showing was made in court .^regarding the reasonableness of water rates fixed by the board of supervisors. COMPAXV'S ESTIMATE; The company's estimate of the worth of all its properties, as set up.in court In ISO 3, was vaguely expressed as "greatly in excess of $40,000,000J\ The company has acquired no very large • properties since 190s. Nevertheless it was set up in the suit of ISO", filed a few . months ago, as a basis of its j claims to interest through the medium of water rates, that the actual cost of the water works 'had been, more than 553.599.450.72. It was also declared that the sales of stocks had amounted ' to $55.b9?.450.72, and the sales of bonds $17,859,000. Here Is a jump in the company's figures in the cost of the works in four years from $36,2116,235.70 to a cum $17,502,225.02 greater. Per haps these figures will carry their own . argument in determining the good faith of the company with the public \ when water rales an} to be established. . > b far back as 1903 United States Circuit Judge Morrow, rendering an opinion in the first of the series of federal injunction suits on the water • rates, said: "Tlie court Is of t!ip opinion that the complainant (Spring Valley, water com pany) is entitled to receive at least 5 p«=r cent as the net compensation on thf> value of its property. With theEe estimates determined the following re sult was reached: "Value of property, at least $26.7^2, 500; rate of income, 5 per cent as net compensation for year, $1,337,625; op orating expenses, 1506.000; taxes, $236, 000; total expenses. $792,390; gross In come should be for the year, $2,130,015." The value fixed by Judge Morrow was Just about half the value fixed by the company less than two years 'after the jrreat fire and earthquake as "the actual cost of the water works." As a matter of fact, it is said by directors of the Spring Valley water company that the properties could be boug-ht at this tinr 1 for the stock, esti mated at $14,000,000, and the bonds al ready issued. The outstanding- bonded debt is $1 7,800.000. This would make a total of $31,800,000. excluding properties j that are not used in producing the San Francisco water supply. All the non producing properties have been turned In for years as part of the basis of the claim for intf rest*- The city, having in vestigated the values of the Spring Valley- properties, has estimated the : total at J24.000.000 in round numbers. or $29,000,000 less than the company's estimate for 1907. COMPANY'S PLANS The Spring Valley water company wißhes to clear the way for getting $200,000 from the city budget by having the city confess Judgment In the United States circuit court in the suit on the water ordinance of 1907. Should this be done the company, would continue to charge and collect rates on the basis of the water ordinance of 1902, Just as It has been doing for a series of years, ulnce it first tied up the city with an injunction suit in 1903-04. and as It has done annually ever since -with the ex- ception of ISO 6. when unusual circum- stances prevented. If Judgment should be confessed the company would try to get $200,000 from the new mayor and board of supervisors. The proceedings are not viewed with entire complaisance by Attorney W. T. Baggett, who has charge of the city's side of the case In the United States court. Baggett in an interview yes terday reviewed the situation and made a number of significant statements. He said: "The suit filed by the Spring Valley water company in 1907 was: practically the same in tenor as those filed against the city by the water company in 1903, 1904 and 1905. except in relation to the valuations placed on the: properties of the company. The old suits" were set for hearing July 1, but Attorney Kel logg of the water company got exten sions of time to prepare briefs in the cases. The ordinance fixing water rates In 1902 'was not attacked by the water company. . . "In. 1903 suit was begun to enjoin the city from collecting water,- ratesi-under the ordinance. ' of 1903. : This: w§.s*' re peated in 1904 and 1905. The catas trophe of 1906 prevented the filing of a suit in that year. \u25a0 "The company, therefore, is collect ing water rates under the provisions of jthe ordinance of 1902.: In -1907". the company alleged the same sort of thing set up.in the preceding salts, namely. that it would, not be able to pay any income to the share holders. under, the rates after paying' taxes and interest, but would actually fall behind * In- its operating expenses. The company has laid" one assessment on the stock since the fire which, at $3 a share, amounted to $840,000. The company sets up the claim that no .other assesment'ean .be laid en the stock and v that a new. pipe line must be constructed and that there \u2666* no way to get money except -by ask ing: the city, to put up $200,000 in the budget on behalf of the corporation. -;'. SCHEME IS DENOUNCED "Soon after the federated water com mittee was organized it was proposed : to pass c. resolution asking the super visors to put the sum in the budget, but I showed the committee that this would not be effective for the, reason! thai the water rate ordinance of 1907 i had provided for the revenue of th<» company from the city and that neither the city auditor nor the, treasurer would approve the bill for any appro priation of that sort to any private corporation. Why, the . same sort. of' aid could just as well, be invoked forj any one of a thousand Individuals ln v financial trouble and ' with as much i color of law. The only way* for the company to proceed then was to have judgment confessed In. the United! States circuit court by the city. It has. 1 been suggested that the city attorney ! should confess judgment. I may say right here that I shall never take any such action until I am instructed to do so by the mayor and board of super visors. The matter is strictly up to the mayor and supervisors. Nothing can be got out of the treasury by the water company through the budget j while the ordinance of 1907 is in force. "The supervisors cannot repeal ] the I ordinance. A stipulation has been pro- I posed which shall admit nothing eon | eeming the values of the Spring Val j ley properties to have been establlshe.l and that" shall not affect any of the old, suits when confession of judgment in the suit of 1907 against the city; Is considered. \ I will take .no " action in that regard, as I. have said, -unless the 1 mayor and supervisors so instruct. -This office has said that it has serious doubts regarding; the statement that the Spring Valley, under the water rate 'ordinance of 1907, , will not earn any : thing for. the stock v holders after the fixed .charges and operating expenses are paid. The. ordinance. will. give reve nues that were not expected. If there were to be any confession of judgment and any .agreement to-let the- Spring : Valley water company have the $200 000 that it seeks through the budget, it should be. stipulated in behalf of the city that a. strict . accounting should be kept of theroperations of the Spring Valley during the fiscal year and* that the city shall be in constant touch and acquainted fully . with all the trans actions so that, when tha- end of the year /jhall, arrive, if the company has any sum Jeffc. after paying the operat ing expenses and fixta charges the city shall be -repaid. «rv earnincs MILL MAKE IP DIFFERENCE " 'Pcjrhapsi* it has been" said ,to me, "The Spring Valley company will not accept sutiV a proposition.! , i'.'V'Thert,' I said, 'that will be proof that they are lying.' S ;\u25a0•\u2666•; \u25a0!: "The new revenues, which I have mentioned as \u25a0 unexpected, .will more than make up any difference in the receipts of the company. Very large building operations are going on in the city. The water ordinance of 1907 pro vides that the Spring Valley- may charge and collect 13 cents for every barrel of lime or cement that -is used in construction. Also that the com pany may collect 9 cents on every 1,000 bricks that go ihto construction. The lime, bricks and cement .%p be used in construction In 1907-08 have been care fully ' estimated and 1 the new , revenue from that source alone ought ,to be 1500,000." .^V^X^v the good . "How has the Spring Valley so greatly .'lncreased its estimate of the values of its properties?" was asked. "No large physical properties involv ing large values have been added since the original suit of 1903 was filed by the Spring Valley company. But the company has secured witnesses to testify that the L<ake Merced property is worth $14,000,000. This property furnishes a small part of the water supply of San Francisco, but the com pany sets up that its chief value con sists "in what It would bring if laid off in lots and blocks for building uses. The Calaveras water shed lands were bought at $60 an acre. The water com pany;now values this at from $600 to $1,500 an acre 4 It can.be seen r how the company can make up a large showing \ot values. \u25a0•! . n.vrEs i.v otfirEn cities "'"We have secured "comparative fig ures relating to water rates from 25 cities. The average cost per consumer of water in these 25 cities is found to ebs2.so a year. The average cost in San Francisco on the basis of the or dinance ;of 1902, which appears to be satisfactory to the water company, as it has not attacked it, is $5.20 to the consumer. " The actual cost of the water company's 'properties, as taken from the company's books, has been tound to be about $24,000,000 up to this'tlme. The apparent cost, as made, up byUhe company; is \u25a0 what the stocks and bonds have brougtit when Sold. s 'The Spring Valley water company practically confessed bankruptcy when it said that It could' not provide for the construction' of the works which it, was organized to .construct and maintain. This city is not supposed to be in the business; of 'setting private enter prises on their feet. The company says that It cannot supply the pipe line to bring In 30 inches of water and cannot avoid bankruptcy under the provisions of the water ordinance of 1907. Only one thing Is left to do. and that Is, as I have said to the federated water committee, to deal with the com pany for the purchase of the property, but at no more than a reasonable price — not any fancy, price. One thou sand bankrupt . citizens would \ have : the Bame right to ask the city. ;to • help them that 'the Sprftig Valley water company has."-- : Pressure 'has been brought by the Spring Valley water company upon the city, through -arguments addressed to the , federated-.. water committee, repre sentative of "San Francisco's commer cial bodies, to cause the city attorney to confess Judgment. This campaign to get $200,000, which has since been coupled with the, attempt to have the water rates .of 1907 turned down through a confession of, judgment on the, part of the city, was begun when President A. H. , Payson addressed -a communication to Colonel Heuer; chairman of the federated water . com mittee.appointed to conslderthe water supply, in which it was set forth that the water company's estimate covering operating 'expenses, . taxes and Interest on '; the : company's bonded debt for the fiscal year 1907.-08 '.was- in round num bers $1,900,000; that under the 1902-03 rate the' lncome might be estimated at $1,628,000. leaving, a deficit of $272,000 to -be made up out of; the money re ceived, for the city's bills; also recom mending an \u25a0 appropriation of $59,000 for the current year for^ schools, pub lic-buildings, parks 'and s street sprink ling, and alFo a hydrant rate of $5 !a month, altogether making up the deficit 0f : 5239,000 that; was anticipated for the year. . : . CALAMITY. THREATENED . This communication , was sent as an open letter to the federated t water com mitteeon the same- day; that:, the: suit was filed for. an injunction 1 against' th'e city.' -• That * was •- on 1 ' June " 1 last.*-, Since then the city was - threatened r with a THE company claims it has already levied. an assessment of $3 a share*and cannot levy another to make up a deficit of $800,000, asking upon this ground that the city make, good the amount in order to prevent a water"; famine and the wholesale cancellation of fire Insurance policies. serious shortage of. water after "July 1, In the event'of noncompllance 'with the company's wishes,' although the j suit for :an injunctiop: -contained words: ' ;;i ' - / -I "THE COMPLAINANT SAYS THAT IT WILL ENTER UPON 'THE YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1. 1907. WITH A SUPPLY OF OVER . TWENTY THOU SAND MI LLION G A LLONS \u25a0ON H AND IN ITS RESERVOIRS, AS *IT HAS ON HAND., TODAY | IN THE RESERVOIRS OVER TWENTY-SEVEN -THOUSAND MILLION GALLONS,: AND ALSO HAS AN INFLOW OR : SUPPLY-^ OF OVEK FIFTEEN . MILLION GALLONS PER DAY ADDITIONAL FROM ITS ALA MEDA CREEK SYSTEM." " , The members, of the" cornmerclal or ganizations were told that the water supply would fall off greatly about July 1 and were- urged: to act at once, because there was great; danger of a wholesale canceling of ,: insurance on business arid residence properties.^ This plea for action ..was reinforced by.con tlnual pressure. ', 'arid the..; federated water committee,*has,sin ; ,vlew of what was made to appear a great emergency, stood fast with those whom it repre sented^ for whatrit believed to be the welfare of the city.. The, trouble was that It believed too much in. Spring Valley. • : At an early. meetlng»of thefederated water committee,': according .to W. '.T. ; Baggett. an attempt: was made to have a resolution adopted requesting : the supervisors to make provision In budget for an appropriation asked' for, by the Spring Valley water company. . . "I showed the committee," said Bag gett, "that the : - proposition 'was of %no avail and that neither? the auditor nor the treasurer : of San' Francisco t would approve any bills that might ;;: be brought' in by the water company to cover such appropriation .whileT";, the supervisors had provided' for the com pensation of thekepmpany through:: the water rate, ordinance.'.' - Then the 'movement .was started- to have the water rate brdiriance quashed by the simple process of having, judg ment confessed by the city. Haste. to comply with Spring Valley's move was entirely unnecessary, as appearedfrqm the following statement in the official report made by President' "AY H. Pay son.,of the Spring 'Valley 'water com-: pany to J the stockholders In January, 1907: '/>._ -. -\u25a0 . •" V . "there were in the peninsu lar reservoirs after the dis aster nineteen billion'!' six hundred and eightmillionsof gallons of water, which. in connection with the amount of fifteen millions of gal lons daily that we draw .from our sources on the other : side of the bay would have sup plied \u25a0 san -francisco for nearly four ye ars. ] there arf, now in the /reservoirs over sixteen billion gallons/which, with the above mentioned sources across the bay, means a supply for san francisco, without /further rainfall, for fully one thousand datb." Captain Payson has explained to the] stock holders of the Spring Valley, over his signature, what damage "the 'com pany sustained by the disaster of April 18, 1906. This .consisted of the complete destruction of the Pilarcltos pipe llne, : extensive breaks ' in ;the Crys-^ tal springs; 44 inch:conduiti : a" break-in: the 44 inch San Andreas: conduit,^dam-; ages to the city \u25a0 distributing ,sy_stem' In! numerous "breaks where .the pipe's crossed filled ground and the loss of service connections .throughout 'the burned district. OTHER ItESERYOIRS IXTACT "As an offset to this," wrote Cap-! tain Payson, , "you are to be congratu lated upon the fact that the other;dis tributing reservoirs In San Francisco, the great main reservoirs upon the pe ninsula, the' submarine pipes, the .miles of tunnels on both sides of the bay. and the costly* pumping stations > Wero practically uninjured." - .. .:'.-;' Concerning the revenues -.Captain Payson also reported [to the stock hold ers at the annual meeting of the Spring Valley company as follows: %•..-\u25a0 7 . "THE INCREASE IN INCOME SINCE THE FIRE HAS BEEN BETTER THAN EXPECTED. THE NUMBER OF SER VICES FOR THE MONTH OF, OCTO BER WAS THE GREATEST IN I THE HISTORY OF THE COMPANY- FOR A SINGLE MONTH. THE TOTAL NUM BER OF..NEW. SERVICES -FOR THE YEAR WAS 4,550 AND- FOR THE PERIOD SINCE APRIL 18, 1906, : WAS 3.708. , IT IS TO BE .REMEMBERED IN THIS CONNECTION THAT '.THESE SERVICES ARE LARGELY ' FOR THE NUMEROUS SMALL .'' BUILDINGS WHICH ARE BEING ERECTED A.LL OVER THE CITY, AND THE CREASE OF' INCOME RESULTING FROM : THEM IS NOT ,-.. COMMENSU RATE WITH THEIR NUMBER." i :.f Nothlng.has' happened to hinder- an increase in the number of ;rate payers since Captain Payson '; . wrote \ these cheering,.. words. .; On the I, .contrary, fa large number of ; buildings has been erected, . all haying water; service, and the" work 'of constructing -buildings that demand , .water j : from /-. the : San Francisco monopoly Is continuing. .The year v 1906, which might reasonably have been supposed 'to be 1 ; aV bad one ': t or Spring* Valley, resulted r.ln " leaving'a cash balance In the hands c of.thefcom pany; as . shown by/. a; financial report submitted to the stock holders \u25a0 by 'J.'il.' Duke, the company's'" Secretary.:- The income In : 1906, -notwithstanding ,- the interruption, -amounted, to, $2,843,616.44." The water sales i^were 1 $1,535,782.65. • An assessment, which is ! significantly, marked "No. 1" iri: the financial account,' which shows that; the company, dli not then think it impossible, -.to placeman other assessment •on i the ; stock," $840,171. . The operating, expenses amounted to $486,775.60 ;: permanent lm-" provements;to $262, 645.76 ;'\u25a0> taxe5,, $279, 994.17; dividends, $189,321.63; interest and c0up0n5, '5943,07 5.71'.-: : :. 'At.thecndof/theiyearithe sum de posited with a trust company'amount ed to ; $438,08 1.62. cash: balance .'with which the Spring .,. Valley "began the 1 present year. The;- surplus; and ; the 1 amount of I the, dividends : paW rfmake up ; a" total. of $627,403.25 to^offset. the ?840,-" 171 .which it V was,^necessary"-; to ;faiSft by assessment : In, anf emergency. sum asked; from ;the city .t budgets was $200,000. The difference.^ between^ the total of the cash 'ibalande^'onV January : 1.-. l3o7,, and 'the i dividend ipaldi* In ! 1906 and the amount -"of ithe-assessmentilevi led on the stock was; $212,767.75.2 12,767.75. 4 These figures are all In! the: painphlet'sent": out by^ the: directors of "the/company '\u25a0\u25a0\u25a0 to the 'stockholders't to,:: Informs them; of their;, financial fcondltlonp as * ; related -to •the'blg;watercorporatipn/rv.;' : ::•;\u25a0;; •;\u25a0; A; flnar quotations from; Captain; Pay son's annual report <is;as, interesting; in this connection c as "iare|6thers * already used : 'v "It ; Is /dlfflcult,Y4wrote \* Captain Payson, ; "to I say.i now.4what • our; present income : is •' ;( January^ 9? ; 1907 )ti It' changes from7day^tb>dayr^buti $130,000] a'; month is ;'\u25a0;; probably *' ar? conservative vestimatei The > operating Veicpenses.l' increased^ a3 they, have ,been;by I ;theje3cperiditures ;u n^ der. the replacement' account,- have'beeh heavy ; and "twilll continue^ so if or* some time:HoVcome. ii '>?rExistlng|'condltions;aa regards labor, have also Increased these expenses:: 11 ' To sum up,' we are still short THE SA^tFRAISTGISCQIC^LI;^ SATUKJJAY, JJUi^Y 20, ,1907; NEW sources of : revenue, alleges the 1 city ;\u25a0 attorney,** will more'Tthah^ make up any dif ference in the receipts of - the company. The* Spring r Valley \u25a0"may^collect under a new ordinance 13 cents on every 'barrel of lime; and cement, and 9 cents on every 1,000 bricks-used in construction, t aggregating "about • $500,000. EVIDENCE CONCLUSIVE HAWLEY TELLS JURYMEN Senior \ Gourisel for State • Opens . -'Argument' in •\u25a0v* /Boise Trial FAITHv IN! ORCHARD Declares Confession of the Murderer ; Is Nothing • > But the Truth Oscar King Davis ;.; BOISE. Idaho, . July 19.— / he final argument in the 'Haywood trial began this "Afternoon,; when James H. Hawley, senior ~ counsel -for the ' prosecution, opened the discussion of the case on behalf of .; the ••state. 1 - Previous to that Judge ..Wood^hadf read his decision on the materiality of the points 'of the tes timony of; bothsidds on which, he heard arguments . Judge Wood held tliat;a portion of the testimony- of thVdefehse regarding the labor .troubles In". Colorado f; was .'^inadmissible, as it neither] pointed nor; tended to' point to theprocurement'of the crimes to which Orchard confessed iby any other 1 per sons than the. "ones Implicated by the testimony /of , the' Btate. C -':.. ' \u25a0 "Senator, Borali'; having admitted the .state's' failure^ tofcbnnect up ..the-' part. of i rOrcha r rd's i 8t6ry, about Steve Adams, the , court .ordered that Jt shouldttbe withdrawn." ;.. This "action of vthe.' court ..will'' greatly limit the. argument: to Hhe jury." It^very.Vmu'ch circumscribes* the range, over. '.which. Darrow and -Richard-' Bon.'may; travel. It j lilt a Darrow -hard-. jest..; for; it deprives him of the : right to york.hisy sympathy }mt|l." He, has put in" a .' lot ; -, of ~ time and'.derjved,', much pleasure. from;the work in jgetting;out the 'story, of the hardships of .tho bunion meni and :, tolbe, forbidden ..now _to l talk About .it "in ,his! argument- Is almost as £ad/as«bejng departed himself. .. , AttbrneyJHawley.came, into court this morning;loqk.ing f ar'.f rom ; . well and his firs£" words-to" the jury-, VweVe- in: >x planatlpn of., his condition* -and ..in apology,, for, the., eff6ct;v,onr. his speech which ihe; saidvthat < itr would-, cause. .Then he .started: la :tp demonstrate that he.was.fairly.flfcafter all; by; making an, 'interesting -and- foroefuK argument.' The' courtropmrwas crowded: by: a throng of Boise.,people,. who- braved, the;discom forts ;of the -.hot,-. stickyj.day .to hear Hawley. spealcv ;;::.-;.'*:\u25a0 '•• "' ! .;'• DEMANDS' ONLY JUSTICE , "We simply desire that simple and direct 'justice be'done," said the prose cutor • In - beginning \u25a0 his •address. "We are" not- hereto* urge the conviction of a 'man-youv believe or think f can be innoce~nt.'* ' * • .'\u25a0 4 \u25a0 \u25a0 \u25a0 \u25a0"- "•-* '.-\u25a0-\u25a0 '-_ '\u25a0•'\u25a0 \u25a0'\u25a0 '- - - From his polite and^conventlonal pre liminaries-Hawley: launched/Irito a .dis cussion" of ; Orchard and his f 8tory.- He \u25a0said'^th'at^ this > was an ''extraordinary case.'one iofithe'imost" important JnHhe* criminal, history >ef rthe*country,-Textra grflinary, in ; i particular because,; of , Its principal :; Harry 'Orchard. He declared Uhat Orchard's: calm, i cool,; dls passionate'mannerjon'the \u25a0witness stand .was in. itself . a-. demonstration ? of \ the truth-of hiat-story. "Generally,'.', he. con tinued, '.. "we tell :the<story:,bf 'an inform er; with -much allowance."; We «f*el that boastfulness of Xearvwlll; influence him. But>.that is F not the r- case, i here.' His manner., his. bparlng, .his actions during the v. two : i days,- of examination and throughout-, the: six ; days, of: strenuous oross examination,; unparalleled In its fierceness, compelj the*. conviction -that he was speaking;;the;slmple -truth. *, "Orchard's- evidence Vwill. -be attacked and; that. Is .tproper. 1 h I \ am^ not * a be liever,^ in deathbed Kconversionifbut , no man, can Hsten^tQ-his story,' without be ing convinced that; thA awakening of his -conscience ? was ;8inoere -and thor ough. v .It s was.-. the!- saving: ; power "- of divine grace that impelled him to make the confession to bring to -the"; bar." of Justice the. worst set., of, conspirators .ever known in this - . TAKES iV UP TfiftTIMONY \ : Hawley went into in explanation of 4 the law., of conspiracy,', following that with a dlsc.us3l6n.;6fii4w"regardlng ; ac cessories before. the fact ?who. In Idaho are^held; responsible'^as^prlnqlpals.. He 'explained^ the position' of Cthe .acebnt' plice. In ; . view of the -Idaho 'law, v and having' thus" cleared .the path of .-its legal 'TntricaCIes -Tie' took^up .the .evi dence and began. tQ ; ,follow, its course, from the opening of. the state's * case; In the Coeurd'Alene** on .through th« story of ithe,* conspiracy.", \u25a0 H jl' dldl not ; confine himself ; to " the .evidence Introduced' by the- prosecution, but =.«on8|dered It I to gether with what "the 1 defense ; had ot fered to. controvert It." Cf^^'. . -\u25a0* Hawley,; warmedVup as » he began to speak ; of , '/Big Bill'litDavls.i. ; VI don't blame '; a\ man^who 'commits ' perjury \u25a0 to save ; : himself;';;^ said 1 Hawley,; "but this man . tells " an' absolutely : "unnecessary falsehood, when- he » says ; that he^was not in i.Wardner on - the day of the riot. No ; act i of 1 violence :• could :'have 1 been committed there \u25a0 without V his i.'b'eing present.-. "He Is not the kind. that stands back while Qthers^ go to the front, and his denial ; that he ;was present is a ridiculous;; untruth.- .His.; whole mony was simply j Intended to ; Impress oni your^ minds :;the; notions- that :: the unions Iwere,; not .responsible (for the violence there." ' ; ": . , } .Prom ,the ..': Coeur d'Alenes t Hawley went, down 'to Colorado -and: took', up the attempts that had been made In the Vindicator * mine, : culminating 'In \ the explosion -in the A shafts that •\u25a0killed Burke j and \ McCprmick; J-He : went 'i over, jOrchard's stpry, of -the 'discovery \u25a0 of, the powder -lnlthe^elghthUevelUnd of Uhft effort Ho^{ set it ; off. -an v effort .which falledi beeause \u25a0'\u25a0 the s^imlne*~ had?-;.beeh started ",\ip. again i \n k the ".intervariand the- powder.l replaced Uh*the; ; magazine. -v ; \u25a0\u25a0'-*\u25a0 . vThat -brought. him- toUhelstory, of the bomb^thatiOrchardT&nd'xOwney.tBarnea made/; and Ha.wl«y told \the* Jury, how In aH ; the. : work .{that' the < prosecution had .done ln ; the preparation of the evidence in i income i of ,' the - amount * necessary! 1 to pay Ataxes.'J interest ' and;operating:ex penses,": BUT, THK-! GRATIFYING. IN CREASE \u25a0 > DURING I THE i PASTi SFE W MONTHS » " JUSTIFIES iV» THE HOPI3 THATS DURING ITHE ? COMINa^YBAU OUR > COLLECTIONS ?-T?ILLt RE ACH 'A FIGURE * iTHAT jIWILL^GIVE USLA SAFE > MARGIN;* IN * ; THIB .RESPECT.". . YOSEMITE ' VAliliEif Is<now reached by theYosenilte Valley railroad. No ..wearisome and dusty stag **}&.-$ Spends your ;' vacation 5 amonff.the cliffs,icrags;aTidUov>ly~waterfanß,inow at ..their *best-^only ."a <\u25a0 few: hours ; from San FrandecoA? Sixty omilesibf the wild Merced '? ( Cal . ) g river* 1 canyon 5, «n * route. l, l ß.6ojrorJthe,round«trlp;lr(Kn: Merced. CaL S rlte J°- w « L«hxner, • trafllo man- .-.•fTp.HE increase in income since the fire has, I been better, than expected. The number \u25a0'.'« of services for October v/as; the greatest in the history of the company ,f or a single: : month. The total number of newsservices, for, the year was 4,55(5 ."—-Report of President Pay son" to Spring : - Valley company. CAPTAIN MOONEY WILL KNOW HIS FATE SOON Trial for Violating Rules of the Is Concluded DECISION TUESDAY Makes a General Denial of '"\u25a0! Statements Charged Against Him ; Captain of : Police" John Mooney, Charged with violating the rules of the department by " making unfavor abl6:commentß;tregarding , the, police commissioners ] arid I' the chief "of police, wiir'khow'hls ;fat« y on Tuesday. '/\u25a0 The case for; the ; prosecution- was closed on Thursday ? and ;the -defense was heard yesterday > afternoon.- . P Captain Mooney ? gave a general de nial -t; to the published statements at tributed 'to^ him fin.- the of April 15. /He said : that he was told " on the -evening ;of ; April \i' that, 1 ; Chief Dlnan;\wa3.; to "prefer^- charges .against him* and that h& had: replied that if the chief 'did *so \u25a0he .would r. prefer : charges against; the; chief :". f Mooney said he. had received a protest from/property-owne rs '.against vPratt &'' ; Tlerney's saloon In /Ellis 'street,- and , he'Jhad rtold the policemeh'! ln' 'the*.- assembly, room- that if ithe.i statements'" in the protest" were true V they had J.been .derelict' in > their duty. ."He denied that he had said. that half of : the men; in his command were corrupt.^. .He, adrhi tted /that ; the'state ments v attfjbut^d'to him: in. .The Call .were substantially /correct and claimed that the Examiner' article' was gener ally Jncorrect- ; .The only comment he made about^the': commissioners 'was in regard:; to J,their l.decision lln the Rocca case/ : which* -he' thought -should have beenv the other "way.-' , He contradicted the r testimony :bf .Detective. Sergeant Fanning .and complained: that .Fanning had-',iiot* saluted. him in Van" Ness ave nue. la"st-..Tuesday.l ;. ... :','.\ '.". '\u25a0^ln^ the -Cross /examination of Mooney .by. the; commissioners .he said '. that he had-sentva-yreport to' : Chief Dlnan that he .was not.r esponsible for the sen \u25a0satlorial - statements- in j the "Examiner. He Jdld -not ask. for, r a. retraction j as" he considered jit \u25a0useless, and was. not; con cerned or not these' statements were detrimental to the standard of dis cipline Irtthe department. He said that {he- did 'not \u25ba know ot any corruption in -the -department except a ; case.'of ex tortion- whichswas being investigated by.- the.- grand, jujy. : y^SX" .-..Captain&l. O. Anderson testified that he -had. always found Captain' Mooney a good officer and attentive to his duties. -Dieutenant .W..J. ; Mullender> corrobo rated. Mooney. as to what he said to . the,v policemen regarding the-, protest against; Pratt & -Tlerney's saloon iahd . it was :agreed that Lle.uteriknt McManus arid "several policeirienlwould" testify to : the?eame>*efrect.^ f This"- closed 'the' case and -President 'Hagerty that the board would render Its decision on Tuesday.' s : v Speculation -Is rife ~as to; Mooney's fate. : There are four courses ppen to the r board,' to^dlsmls«,fine^ reprimand or, acquit? I There is no provision in the charter for dlsratement. lllf DPSillUTlir v ANB SLAY JAPANESE Contl uned :f: f rom" Page I, Column 5 Ito to, the ' effect - that he regretted that his ' Ignoran t\ subjects ; had caused vio lent *commqtionT' He: therefore .relied upon ltd -to take measures necessary to further itrouble. '-i<^V Japanese 'troops i have been offered for - 1 the ? safeguarding- lot i foreign con sulates .In i Seoul.' .:> wX tV .S /\u25a0-:\u25a0'" ± - >-'- \u25a0•-'••' \u25a0\u25a0~'h';'r . 'SEOUL., 7 July 19.-7-A. crowd of 6,000 Koreans was-rbeatch back from 'the palace;- gates. c - During ; the . emperor's audience -with ;the,*cabinet ; -laßt night, when he acquiesced, to the. demand for abdication; a -number of -students 1 at tempted' to. present a. petition ,to iMmi but the. police \u25a0\u25a0them." from doing,. so, ,x., x . driving ;them«backv east of the palace,- where'; they .remained all night- makihg r speeches. '\u25a0:'{\u25a0 The -elaborate /ceremony -of trans-! f erring .thfe 'lmperial seal ;to the crown prince, was In progress this, forenoon. The ; Korean Official Gazette is * circu lating:;irt. the ; , streets ,• the,: first ; official announcement .of the abdication,* .which was , signed by '.the emperor ' and , seven ministers ; in' favor of the crown prince. for the trial It '; had never • been able . to locate ,thaf bomb, andr"in. fact did; not know ; that [i the = man : who ; agreed i.with 7 Orchard ; to ;throw, it in to ithe .Vindicator coal ,bunkers "; had ! k«pt \ his 'i word liintll young.; Ramsey } testified \u25a0' here \u25a0 the '\u25a0 other day and told of ; Its being, found in -the coal. * : ; Then came ; the^ chief explosion and^the killlng/of ,;the,.two men. ' uVi'The" clever^ attorneys f f or the . de-r f ense". realized ,the" force of , that • story ,"~ he >said,S "they S knewj: that ;-,they \ could not T meets It;* and;, they .understood the necessity of .bringing a" .witness here] to show. that it might have been'all 'acci dent/ * My ; shrewd friends then Jooked up |Thomaß; "Wood-V,: I # will . admit; that Wood' impressed me ; at- first , as", telling ' the; truth*/- 1 ; could ; riot believe that \ he wasiabsolutelylylng until I heardifrom theiothenwitnesses.''; : .: \"-'-'2f3SKB ,;l;WlthUhat;Hawley;went over; Wood's story, aridf showed how it had ;beerj cpn tradlCted;;; not i, only ;. t>y ; ; Holmahi^ and Ramsey;'' but- '^ by;\ the '-_'.,' photographs, which* .v he'*; declared, "could - not \u25a0 -lie about it." ; \u0084:"-,•.- I'\u25a0 -\u25a0:\u25a0\u25a0'\u25a0" \u25a0 ' \u25a0.-, '\u25a0'«':. >,/.'.' \u25a0\u25a0;' .\u25a0^'AllUhlß: testimony on .the. theory, of accident UnHhe -.Vindicator ;- explosion," coritiriuedt ! >Hawley, i: : f'was Introduced simply/ to enable; counser;t& .^build; up \u25a0omethlngitolbefogftha^issue'andfdlft-* tract -yourj attention' from- the real acts.' The fact l is- ttha i To"mf t "Wobdi absolutely told % an 1 'untruth f and % told 'fit ,1 for I the purpo3e,!of;'iTnpresslng.i:upon< this" jury avlbelleftihltheitruth(of;falsa v lbelleftihltheitruth(of;fals« i ;theoryA'/ .rl Hawley'a ,' closing v remarks r, were _ . in the ;natUreTofJ;aJ > direct^jft.ppealito j . the Jufyirien>'th*ernselveß;ahd^lnimaking:;it heXused 4 langruagß >,which caused V many of .{the^ audience * to % fairly ' hold ' ; their breath,^ for Ut^was-T an; admission Jwhich contained i; appeal i; andi* warnings; and menace] all' together/v; His closing sen tehee": was : \ [\u25a0•[ VTlie \ man * who 1 would not convict^ on : this ; alone,' without ; going further^ is i simply^ looking jfor,| a s reasqn f orreyaditter,' an '.unpleasant 'duty: 'and i not trylrigitp|do"; hislduty i to.! his * state" and hls?countryj as ' ; an f. honest '\u25a0 juryman." '" Jv- Hawley \wlll continue his • argument tomorrbw\ morning/ '-' fSl^/E hay» secured comparative.. figures. r _e-. W latir.g to water rates prevailing . in 25 other cities. The average cost per capita in the 2\ cities is $2.50 a year. The average ; cost to\ the consumer in " San Fran cisco is $5.20."— Statement made by Assistant City Attorney Bajjgett. % A;" Hale Dying After an Operation for Appendicitis 0. A. HALR. THfc WFXL KNOWN MER CHANT. wnO IS DYING AT THE HAHNE MANX HOSPITAL. from the bedside of O. A. Hale at a late hour last night was to the effect that the well known merchant was. very -low. and that his .physicians held out little hope for his ultimate recovery. - , -Since the operation for appendicitis last "Thursday • at, the Hahnemann hos pital.: California and - Maple streets. Hale has gradually, lost in his struggle for life. On account "of the. peculiar character, of his malady the' operation which was performed was more than ordinarily critical. It would be fully 48 hours -. after the surgeons finished their work before they could state what the probable result would be, and even" after 48 hours there would still remain grave danger from . blood poisoning, they said. ..The merchant was enjoying a vaca tion at Monterey when he was sudden ly taken 111. He was out salmon fish ing. Dr. W. H. Ward of this city was summoned at once and had the sick man" brought -to San Francisco a3 quickly as possible in a desperate ef fort.to save his live by an operation. : As member of the firm of Hale Broth ers, O. A. Hale had been prominently connected with the commercial life of three 'cities, San Francisco, San Jose and Sacramento, In all of which places his firm enjoys extended patronage and prosperity. When- the committee .was named to superintend the- reconstruc tion of Agnews asylum Hale was made chairman and was active in the com mittee up to the time he was taken 11. REBELS TRY TO KILL ECUADOR'S PRESIDENT GUAYAQUIL^ ECquadof,' July 19.^-The four, military/" barracks : in " this ' city were attacked simultaneously' just be fore, daybreak , this , morning by groups of . armed ; revolutionists who" called themselves independents. Tl\e fighting lasted for one hour. The Independents were finally defeated, several of their number being killed^ or. wounded. The local residence of President Al faro also was attacked. The revolu tionaries purposed' to kill the presi dent, but he succeeded in coming out of the conflict uninjured. ; Guayaquil- has been placed under martial law. • < -•Order was not -restored during the day.' There is great alarm. All busi ness Is suspended. It was the, intention of the conspir ators to assassinate President Alf aro, but he- was . notified.. of this Intention before his residence .was attacked and verified a report, that a part of the po lice'regiment was working, in con junction with the revolutionists. When the independents attacked the police a fight took place in the barracks among the policemen, r • . V - - -President Alfaro' 3 .residence was at tacked on both, sides. - The .president was seen' personally at- the head iota body of. troops resisting the attack. , "..The police lost 18 . men 'and^hlne were -wounded:' '\u25a0 - .. '*\u25a0 The leaders of. the conspiracy have been arrested. A large ;quantity^ of rifles and: machetes were found in the houses of conspirators. The troops re mained loyai. BSSSSSSSBRIBi JAPANESE STATESMAN *. r WILL INVESTIGATE HERE Corning to United \u25a0 States to Inquire Into Treatment Accorded to His * Countrymen TOKYO, July . 20.--M.lshi, director of s the 'commercial bureau 'of the for eign ; office.' .will start today for America to. Investigate the treatment of Japan ese and the. labor question. It Is reported that" should the cor respondence; which " was "exchanged be tween. Washington and on the San" Francisco -Incidents -be published. Japan's "lndl gnatlon would be Increased. The ; report, \u25a0 however, Is " authoritatively discredited. : / t ' 7 : :It is expected . that M. Ishi.'s visit will serve to> dispel- the v last cloud of doubt in the friendly relations of both nations. ." . * " , .; BANKKXTPT CLlßK— William ,R. Tblrken. clerk, Sacrdßaento," fll*d 'a :p«UUon in. 111201- T*ncy - jestftda y. ; rHe owes $1,31S and . baa .. no a***ts. \u25a0. \u25a0 - \u25a0 - : '^lOffitlTOllflfiwfflTiiniiTMißriiMn B&. 'RBftv *fiHHfe \u25a0• .^^^tok. *ii^*"^^ l' r~^^ Wtrr^ it^TJ^hs f^*i^ &~^&h* J«L gWHCRE •ENT OR FOLDED HAVE «OiUE Of^THE INTERUNINO CUT AWAY.S ,0^ THIS PREVENTS CRACKING AND GIVES GREATER FLEXI3ILITY. !?l^a >°° sttlcs in quartch sizes ; i 3« each: a ran tso. f^^ *ref _^^^_^ CLUETT. FEABOOY A CO. V;iJ>j MfIYQraLOR FORMING 111 OF SUPERVISORS Continued from fng-e 1. Column 1 "servants of .the people" are near at an end. Former Police Chief ' Wittman was busy yesterday among his friends in or ganizing a movement to regain his old position at the head of the force. He believes that h« will have the baokins of the members of the old board of su pervisors who have consented. to go oa the new board. \ District. Attorney Langclon said yes terday that he had received no word from Mayor Taylor tn regard to the resignations of thr- boodling member?* of the board of supervisors.. These members, however, will withdraw. -as soon as the district attorney requests them to do so. Dr. 'Taylor received many additional congratulatory messages yesterday oa his appointment as mayor, among the greetings being one froii Charles War ren Stoddard. as follows-. "Monterey. Cal., July IS, 1907. — Dear Poet: With'all my h*?art I congratulate you. the city of San rrancisco and tho state of California on your appoint ment as mayor. "The right man in the right place at the right time. God bless you. Ever your friend." • j Herman Scheffauer. the poet, sent In the following letter: "Dear Mr. Taylor: The heartiest" con gratulations to you (and to our city) upon your, appointment. I can con celve of no man worthier of this civic dignity than yourself. The prestige of your name and personality will once more exalt our stricken city to the proud place she should occupy as the western metropolis.'* Dr. Taylor received the following from the Bar association: "Whereas, our friend, associate and past president. t Dr. Edward Robeson Taylor, has been chosen mayor of the city and county of San Francisco; and "Whereas, we recognize in Dr. Tay lor the highest and best type of .the American citizen, be it "Resolted. that we hereby e.-fpress. to him our profound esteem and devotion. we tender to him our unlimited support and we trust that his will be the key of municipal administration." CONTRA GOSTA ASSESSOR ACCUSED OF GRAFTING Continued from Page 1, Column S pany is assessed for but, $202.600, while It was sold to the Guggenheim trust last year for $6,000,000 and has been improved to a vast extent since. The Henry Cowell lime and cement company is assessed for a small sum. but the 'company; refused recently to sell its quarry near Concord; for $1.00*.-. 00<hi*: I T_he-*pTop«rty -and" Improvements of the 'Martinez winery* at Hookston are assessed for only:$17.000. while ttte supervisors claim that'the winery could not be purchased for 1200.000. Another question that is being pro pounded for Assessor Jones to answer is. ""Why has he failed to stamp on the rolls each year 'property- sold to the state.' and why was it that he did not observe the law in this regard until last January, and then only under threats of a t suit to force the perform ance of this' work?" "For a long time Jones has been un popular with the majority of the people of Contra Costa county, but b,y somo weans has always managed to hold on to this office. He is one of those who has been in the courthouse for the past 20 years and was a close frfend of the late county treasurer, George A. Wiley, /who committed suicide when It was about to be discovered that he had embezzled $17,230.50 of the county's money. Orders for Officers of Army and Navy Washington; July 10.— a mi y ordrrmt -Second LJentenant T. MlHrr. Seventh cavalry, aid de camp, - will report In p«mon to the com manding general, department of California, for duty, pending; fur ther orders. rl . Captain E. Haldlman P. Yonng, qnartermastcr. Is relieved from : duty m assistant - qnartermas- - tee' at Philadelphia and will* proceed to San Francisco and sail ' for Manila aad report to the com- \u25a0 mandins .general of the Phillp . pines for duty. Major General McK. William- . •on, qnarterma.ttrr, -will proceed . to San' Francisco and report to. the - adjutant general for further or ders. : ' .Navy^ orders! The follow las cable was from commanding: chief of Pacific fleet. Cheroot Com mander B. \V. ' Hodge* la detached \u25a0 from command of the RainboTv to \u25a0 command the Galveston.