Newspaper Page Text
: i The Great Leader. Pull Text of Senator Voorheea' Great Epeech. The Cause of the People at Last Finds a Worthy Champion. The Ke-Note to the Campaign of 1880 and the Formal Inauguration of a New Era' of Peace, Prosperity and Human Progress- CoDgresioDal Record, Jan 15. Mr. Voorheea: Mr. President, on the 13:b of Ddcember I had the honor to introduce in this body the following resolution: Reerlrei, Thjt it t of the l'rt"t im portunes tnai the financial credit vf the Country be maintained, and. in order to do io tne government H-ell, in U H" department-, inould in good faitn kvep all t -traota and orligauona entered into wltn Ita own cltiaena. And in pursuance of a notice then given I now call it up for the purpose of discussm the subject to which it re lates. The agitation of the question of finance has continued without a mo ment's intermission from the eommenc ment of our present system until this hour. Nor is it likely to cease for many years to come. In tact it will never cease until the people are satisfied that our vast debt is in progress of ex tinction upon principles of justice to tT.nini labor, or until, on the other hni thv are subiugetsd ititJ silent submission and the government itself becomes changed in spirit and form into a moneyed aristocracy. It may be that thia Uttnr alternative is to over take us. There are dark and plentiful omens in our recent history indicating such a conclusion, and there is a numer ous and powerful class in our miaai vho Relieve, as Alexander Hamilton HArUrAd that the British government, on this as well a on ether points, is the hunt ever devised bv the wiadom of man. Those entertaining this opinion have thus tar triumphed in the financial leg i.i.iinn nf ihn United Stites. and tbe time baa now arrived when their victo ries must be reversed or soon this gov ernment will cease to be republican and the neonle no longer fe free. Tn iv.linv of this victorious interest ;n thia enuntrv. as in all others, has been vigilant for opportunities of greed andeain. and aggressive in appropriat ing thnm tr its own advantage. In its tnnai-ious rjursuit of this policy it has during the last sixteen years pressed its mi and uHuat demands upon tbe Am rian rteorjle in a variety of shapes J uat now it assumes a manner swollen with arrogance, haughty, denani, ana filled with iDBolence toward all oppo nents. Those who are ranged on the side of grasping wealth affect a high disdain a those who choose to remem ber that labor has rights which this government Is called upon to protect. There seems to be an immense sneer oo the face of sordid, inactive capital, as if its pretentions wer beyond the criti cism cf ordinary mortals. Its advo cates outside of Congress do nut conde scend, as a general thing, to argument at all. Denunciation Is now their prin cipal weapon. There Is no epithet, however bane, no insinuation however infamous that is not of daily use against all who dare to differ in opinion with them. A curious spectacle is presented on this subject by a large portion of tbe Eastern press, hire and there aided by a newspaptsr in the West. Their columns reek from day to day with clamorous abuse of all who venture to believe as I do that, to a great extent, our whole financial evsiem is an organ ized crime against the Uboring, tax paying mn and women of the United Slates. Those who think as I do that a irreat work of financial reform is de manded in order t j secure the people from slaverv in fact, if not in mime, are denounced in the same spirit, and in the exact language with which every crimi nal abuse in government, uirouguouiau history, has sought to jaralyze the work of reformation and beat back tbe tide of human progress. Wherever in tbe annals of tbe bumnn race unholy avarice, bas built its strongholds, and nrivileered classes have entrenched them selves; wherevar superstition has held tbe human mind in bondage for the hum fit of it)-ritual tyrant; wherever man in anv war has had unlawful mas terv over bis fellow-man and gathered in what belonged to another, there the same cry which we now hear bas always bean raised against any intrusion or aia lurbance of established arid venerable iniquity. Nor does the parallel stop here. The great plea of the present hour for the continuation of wrong and imustice is that good faith requires it Those who. finding a monstrous evil embeded in the laws of their country, which to eradicate it by personal legisla tinn am at once and with the utmost fury assaulted as violators of tbe public faitb. enemies of tbe national honor, and wore if possible than common swindlers. It matters not bow de p and burning the outrage may be or how fr.i.rinlnntl v it may have crept into our statutes, crood faitb. in the estimation of thort who profit by the outrage, requires there forever, though it should aid day by day tbe ghattly nrb cif ruin that now pervades the land. When the peasantry of Fianc, in 1789. worn out with the extortions of five centuries, arose against kiug, priests and nobles, they were told that ihAi were breakinz the faith of tbe nation which had been pledged a thou sand times for their silent submission to any wrong, to person or property, how .vur hnrrible or wdescricabl. When .car th starving people of Ireland, in ik. a nun ranturies of the past, have rrnwn uneasy in their bondage and struggle against their tetters, tbey have Kaon flroelv reminded that the good laith of England is solemnly pledged to maintain existing laws and perpetual abuses. Sir, this plea, so loud now in our ears, has been invoked in bubalf tf every wickednsss that ever cursed the world. The usurper invokes it to protect tbe throne be bas stolen, as soon as he is seated. The tyrant invokes it to ebe' ter bis prerogative, and his nobility in turn invoke it in order to live in ease and splendor off the labor of cth rs. It is my purpose on this occasion, however, to show what the obligntions nf vaoA faith require of us on the grebt question of our finances, and to arraign those who havesystemaUcally broken it whenever their interest prompted them to do so. It is my purpose alsj to show that while if is of the highest impor Wnceto maintain cur financial credit, it can only be done by tbe government keeping all its contracts and obligations with iU own citizens. This issue has been preieoted of la'.e in a manner so persistent and offensive, especially to western men and western interests, that it shall now be met, as far as may hum ble capacity enables me to meet it. Sir, I appeal to the history of our fi nancial legislation. I challenge its eol em n records for Judgment against the actual repudiatcr of national faith anc honor. Ita pages contain the facts, the immutable facts, from wbicn the iu ture historian will judge this question. In us candidly review them. The act of February 25, 1862, is the begin I ning of our bonded debt. The preciouf , molals were found to be unequal to th emergency of -war. Specie payment J were abandoned as soon as the hour ol trial came, and gold ana silver cow ered in the rear, while the legal tender dollar went to the front with the flag and stayed there. I was among those who doubted our right to issue it, bui experience has shown it the bes' money, all things considered, that eve' circulated on American soil. By thit act of February, 1862, and by similai legislation at subsequent periods, every bond issuea oj tne uovtrumcui """ did not on its face stipulate ior pay ment in coin was made payable by the express words of the law in legal ten- der cotes, it was piainiy wmwu the statute that these notes, now known as greenbacks, "shall be receivable in payment of all taxes, internal duties, excise, debts, and demands of every kind due to the unnea Diaiw, exuepi duties on imports; and ot ail claim and demands against the United States tf every kind whatever, except for in terest upon bonds and notes, which shall be paid in coin ; ana snau ama oe law ful money and a legal tender in pay ment of all debts, publio and private within the United States, except duties n imooits and interest as aforesaid. This simple, explicit, and at the same time comprehensive enactment guaran teed to the American people me rigui to nav three-fourths of their national debt in national currency. It was the i.n nt th contract when all tne a 4u bonds, amounting to over fifteen bun rirnd millions, wtra purchased from th Government by the bondholders, and paid for in this currency at par, when it vaa nuoted at from 40 to 60 pr Of nl. hnl.tw tar in coin. Every one under stood the law to be as I have stated at the time of its passage. In tact, tne great struggle then was whether even the interest on the bonds I have men tioned should be paid in coin. Tbe act .f February 25. 1862. first passed the House without any provision at ail for thn enin payment of interest. That fea tare of the law was attached here in the Senate, as an amendment, and when tbe act, thus amended, was returned to th House, a violent conflict at once arose. An examination of the Con gressional Record for the second ees fiion of the Thirtv-seventb Congress, at tiases 821 and 900. will show that both Mr. Sualdinp. of New York, and Mr Stevens, of Pennsylvania, the leading members of the Committee of Ways and Means, and one ltd chairman united in denouncing the Senate amendment in the bitterest and si verest terms. Tbey contended, in stern and determined language, that even tbe payment of interest in coin was an odious and uniutt discrimination in fa vor of the bondholder and against tbe soldier, tbe sailor, and the citizen, who were comoelled to receive tne legal ten der currency, greatly depreciated ny this very discrimination No one by a single word in that en tire debate made tbe slightest pretense or intimation that tbe principal of tbe bands was payable in com. .During tbe full term of seven eventful year that followed there is cot a platform ot either political party in any Male 1 the Union which makes such an aaser tion. No claim for such a construction of the law in behalf of the bondholder ever fell from the lips of a leading member of the party in power dunn the same length ot time in eitcer oranch ol Congress, or anywhere else. a far as tbe public is advised. On tbe contrary in many States, and notably. in Ohio, tbe home ot tne .rresiaeut an his Secretory of the Treasury, the dom insnt paity in its atate tjonvenuou 1868 expressed iu deliberate "convic tion that according to the laws under which tbe 6-20 bonds were issuea, sai bonds should be paid in the cuneocy of tbe country which may be legal tenders when tbe Government shall be prepared to redeem such bonds." Oo this doc trine the present chief magistrate and bis secretary took their stand only nine years ago and told tbe people tbal lb doctrine was true. Not only so.butSecra- tarv Sherman, who. now in his recent re port, warns ns against repudiation, then ' . . . . a a n sv t n r a gave in a letter aatea jaarcn tv, iooo ami widely published his idea of what constituted a repudiator. Speaking on j s this sobjoct, he says; "Ukitid States Sinati Chimbc, Wabhibutom, Marcn 'A .bee, "Dkar Sib I was glad to receive your letter. My personal interests are the same as yours, but. like you. I do not intend to be influenced by them My construction of the law is the resu of careful examination, and I (eel quite sure an impartial court would connrm if the case would be tried before a court I send you my views, as fully stated a speech. Your idea that we propose to renudiate or violate a promise when we offer to redeem tbe "principal" lecral tenders is erroneous. I think tbe bondholder violates his pron when be refuses to take tbe same kind money be paid for the bonds. If th case is to be tested by tbe law. 1 am right: if it is to be teated by Jay Cooke' advertisements. I am wrong. I hate repudiation or anything like it; but we ought not to oe aeterrea irom wuat i right for fear ot undeserved epithet It under the law as it stands the hold ers cf five-twenties can only be paid gold, tne bondholder can demand rnly the kind of money be paid, then he is a reDudiator and extortioner to demand money more valuable than he gave. Truly yours, "John Shcbmam.'' When it is remembered that the bond holder never paid a dollar in coin for a bond of any description, but pur chased them all with government cur rency, which the government iuelt ha depreciated by refusing to take it fur custom dues and interest, tbe full mean inc of this letter becomes very pi and very forcible. It is not the off- nrinir of impulse or inexperience. Its author was then Chairman of the Fi nance Committee of this body, and he wrote, as he ssys, after "careful exami nation." By the light which he here thenwa upon the subject we may see tbe exact beginning of repudiation and hh,M the furtive and ravenous move- menU of the actual repudiators as they hurry up and down tne precinu ot leg islation during the last nine years o our hu-torv. By us light too we behold the present Secretary ot the Treasury, judged by his own words, as the chief of repudiators, foremost amou wo di lators ot contracts, ana a leauer -muug those who have in no instance kept the good faith of the government with its own people a moment after tbey found that bad faith would bring them richer gains. In less than ten months after this lettfr was written, and alter tbe enunciation cf the Ohio platform, lion. John Sherman, then a senator, advocated and procured the passage of the act of Msrcb, 1869, for tbe paymnnt of all the bonds in coin, which he had declared payable in cur rency, thereby establishing an open re pudiation Of a solemn and binding con- j tract and fastening an extortion of not eat than $500,OCO,000 on the staggering ndustries of the country as the pecu- Utive profits of the operation. " In tte hft a flntnt nictnrv or ma civiuzeu world no parallel can be found to this J audacious aeea ot proaeu iitu, uouutw ate treachery to tbe people, and national dishonesty. It ttands out by itself, towering high above all common frauds and dwarfing mem . in compari son with iu own vast proportions. It will bear the names of tooee who enact ed it to distant generations amidst tbe groans, tbe curses, and tbe lamentations of those who toil oo the land and on tbe sea; and more deeply engraven than any otner name ill be forever touna that of tbe Secretary of tbe Treasury a the author of what be nimseii saia con- tituted the two-fold crime of repudia tion and extortion. Do I state the caie too stronijly T Does any Senator thiLk that I am not justified in tbe language use or in tbe conclusion 1 state i xi so, I pray him to recall the utterances of my lamented and distinguished pre decessor in this body. When this mon strous act of repudiation was on us pas- age here in March. lHb. Benaior mor on pointed out in tbe plainest and most explicit manner four distinct acts of . . ... ..! Congress under wnicn tne people una acquired a vested right to pay tbe 5 20 bonds in legal tenaer notes, ana wdicu were to be broken and set asiae oy tne measure then under discussion. Among other things he said: "And now I propound tbe question : It is either intended by this bill to make a new contract or it is not. xi it in tended to make a new contract, I pr tet against it. We should do foul in- iuetice to tbe government and tbe peo ple oi the U nitea states auor we nave sold these bonds on an average for not more tban sixty cents on the dollar now tr make a new contract for the benefit of the holders." Again be says : "It gives to those laws a construction that I do not believe in and tbst I bave shown is contradicted by at least four acts of Congress.'' And again Senator Morton exclaimed with that power of statement which al ways so greatly characterized him : "Sir, it is understood, I believe, that the passage of a bill ot this kind would have tbe effect in Europe, where our financial questions are not well under stood, to increase tbe demand, and that will enable the great operators to sen the bonds they have on hand at a profit. It is in the nature of a broker's opera tion It is a bull movement intended to put up tbe price of bonds for the in terest of parties dealing in them. This great interest is thundering at the doors of Congress, and has for many months and by every means attempted to drive us into legislation for the purpose of making money for the great operators That is wnat it means and nothing else." These are words of intense and over whelming force. Where in the whole range of debate can be found a more re volting picture ot bad taith inspired oy base cupidity than is here portrayed by the greatest party leader perhaps ever known in the American Congress ? He bas passed away, bis voice is silent, and he reeU after life's fitful fever, but this accusation hurled against crimina wrong-doing survives, and will con linue to survive so lung as it remains to be determined who have repudiated tbe sacred obligations and the plighted faith of tbe American Republic. In far distant times generations now unborn while examining tbe sources of the bur dens that bave descended to them, will read the charge made in this pre ence by the late Senator from Indiana. that a combination of stock jobbers as destitute of conscience as pirates, and inspired alone by'ereed tor money, sue cessfully thundered at these doors, and finally drove this government into the most stupendous act of bad faitb and legalized robbery ever practiced upon any people since the dawn or history Five hundred millions made by tbe great operators, and five hundred mil lions lost to the plowman and the me chanic, who have it all to pay I And yet the authors, the instigators, the abettors of this crime, and tbe par ticioators in its proceeds, fill tbe ai with railing on tbe subject of repudia tion. and point their fingers, stained with plunder, at honest men, as repudi ators. because tbey believe that a con tract for the benefit of the people should be held as sacred as one for the benefit of tbe bondholder. Sir, forbearance on this point tai ceased to be a virtue. Those who have at all times labored to keep the faith of the government with tbe citizans and tbe creditors alike, can lot submit any longer to insult added to iciury. to wholesale calumny added to national plunder. In some countries the habit prevails of building a cairn pile cf stones, to mark tbe spot where some traglo event baa happened. So let American taxpayer?, whenever the act of March. 1869, is cited, each east stone noon it to mark tbe place in American history where repudiation be. gan, and where the rights of tbe people were mercilessly and treacherously slaughtered. The next step in the systematic, viola lion of its obligations to its own citi zens by the American government, was taken in the enactment of tbe law of July 14, 1870. known as the act for rr funding tbe national debt. Tbe motive which prompted this legislation bas never yet been fully exposed. It bas al ways been held up in tbe innocent guise of an attempt to reduce the rate of inter est. It was in fact, however, the on. soring of an apprehension remaining in certain minds, even after tbe act of March. 1869, that tbe work of repudi ating the contract for the payment of tbe 6 20 bonds might not be complete and final. These bonds were out standing, and although tbe law of thei payment had jutt been repealed, yet their holders feared that tbe peopl migbt sooner or later in turn repeal tbe faithless act of March, 18C9, and declare agtin for the payment of those origins. bonds according to tne original con. tract. Therefore -this act of July 14, 1870, called tbe refunding ant, was brought in as supplement! to that of .March 1869, and in aid of iU false assertion that our whole bonded debt was pay able In coin. By a sort of moral forgery on the American people tne reiuna ing act provides for the issue of new . . . . a. e i sr n rri bonds to tne amount oi i,ouv,wu,uuu, with an agreement for coin payment written on their face; and then further provides that these new coin bonds shall ha substituted for the original 6-20 bonds, one in exchange for tbe other, dollar for dollar. Avarice in the ordi nary affairs of life bas often tempted the bolder of a deed, a will, a bond, or other obligation for money or property to obtain a false construction, if possi ble or even to change the terms of the instrument in order to enhance its value. Here both tnese ODjecu nave been "obtained by tbe money power, first, a flse construction of theoontract, and next a direct change oi us most vital terms. It is true that a reduction of the rate ot interest on iu now coin bonds is provided for in the act of July, 14, 1870; two hundred mu- lions of these bonds to bear 5 per cent., three hundred millions to bear 4 per cent., and a thousandTmillions to bear 4 per cent. This redaction in the rato o interest bas, at first, the appearance cf a concession to tbe people, but mo ment's, calculation win enow . tne amount ' thus saved utterly trifling in comparison with the enormous lost they sunerea Dy tne wnoie iransacuou. Nor is it to be enpposed that the bold era of tbe 6-20 6 per cent, bonds would surrender them voluntarily in exchange for bonds of a less rate of interest, un less tbev knew they were getting bonds of higher value and were to reap sub stantial advantages by the operation. To draw a different conclusion would be to reverse the well ascertained laws f human nature. The archives ol his tory may be ransacked in vain to find a single instance where a moneyed in vestment reunquisnea wunoui compui- ion a superior tor an interior security. Such a thing was never known and never will be. When, however, . this elaborate scheme for the destruction of the rights of the people in regard to the payment of the 5-20 bonds was supposed w oe fioished; when the gateways ol justice, of law. and of publio morality bad all been clcsed, and double barred, and bolted against the tax-payers by the repudiating acts of March, lBe, ana Juiy, ioiu, am w practice of bad faith on tbe part of tbe government toward iU own cit'eens stop even then? A finality appeared to have been attained, x-rociamauuu w made in every quarter that a per ma nout settlement had been reached of the manner in which every dollar of our na tional debt should be paid. We were constantly reminded from that day for ward that no law-abiding, nonoraoie citizen would ever again seek to reopen or agitate the question, lhe Dona holders were for the lime being content, but thev did not remain so a moment longer than a new opportunity present ed itself for another encroachment upon the heavily taxed industries ot the country. By both the laws or juarcn. 1869. and July. 18", iramea in ineir interest and under their dictation, it is so plainly written that the bonds then . a . . J a I I J ouUUnaiDg ftna aiierw&ra a ue uuuou were payable in ooln not in goia aione. . . . . i i nor in silver alone, but in coin that it is impossible to construct an argument against th proposition. ' Indeed, it is almost equally difficult to make an argument in iU tavor, tor a truth that is self evident does not admit the ordinary methods of reason in its aurtnort. In the first section of the act of July 14, 1870, the bonds therein au thorizad are made "redeemable in coin of the present standard value." What is there here tor construction, w nai word here taken from the law can tbe keenest causist construe into even doubtful meaning? We all know what the term coin means in connection with thn use of the precious metals in the trade and commerce of the world. Even however, if we did not, and we desired to seek a still plainer and more explicit guarantee, we bave only to turo to me act of Marcb. 1869 It declares iu ob ject in the following language: That in order to remove any uouoi as to the purpose of the government to discharge all iU obligations to the pub lic creditors ana to seine conuicwng questions and interpretations oi tujs laws, Dy Virtue oi wnicn aucu uuin tions have been contracted, it is hereby provided and declared that the faith of the United States is solemnly pledged to tbe payment, in coin or its equiva lent, of all the obligations of the United States not bearing interest, known as United States notes, aod of all the interest-bearing obligations of tbe Ucited Slates, except in cases where tbe law authorizing the istue of any such obli gation has expressly provided that the same be paid in lawiui money or ut.ier currency than goia ana euvcr. False and perficlous ai this law is known to bt. yet it has at least one merit. It is absolutely clear and un ambiguous. If human language can be made to convey an unequivocal meaning, then this law pledged tbe fith of tbe government to the peopl and to the world, for tbe payment tf the national debt in "gold and silver. It is a rule of court, however, in find ing tbe true meaning of a law under consideration, to resort, if necessary, to tbe opinions ot those t-y whom it was enacted. If we do so in the present in stance we are amply rewarded by rich discoveries. Wiltiam Pitt Fessenden, then a Senator from Maine, and who also served as Secretary of the Trees ury, used on this floor tbe following laneuaee "Sir, I meant what I said, and the Congress of tbe United States meant what it said, that it would pay so many dollars. What was a dollar? A dollar was defined by statute. It was gold or silver coin." Senator Morion, when pleading here for tbe payment of bonds according to the original contract, made the follow ing statement: "When you return to specie pay meits you have nothing to pay any of your bonds witn out goia or its equiva lent, and therefore the exception here in favor of bonds payable expressly in currency is utterly worthless, because we shall have nothing then but gold and silver with which to pay these bonds." But the evidence on this point would not be complete if 1 did not call Sena tor Sherman, now Secretary of tbe Treasury, to refute not only all th present enemies of silver as a coin cf legal tender, but especially to refute and confound, as neaal, his own subse quent views. In bis recent report on the state of tbe finances, now on our tables, he says: "If the market value of the silver in the new coin is less tban tbe gold dol lar. a forced payment in tbe new coin is a repudiation of a part of tbe debt." Now it is repudiation to pay the na tional debt in anything but gold. What wa his position when tbe act of Marcb, 1869, was here on iu passage T At that time be exclaimed: "What is the first section of this bill? It is simply a solemn pledge of tbe United Stales tbal all tbe obligations of the United States, notes and bonds, shall be paid in gold and silver coin, ex cept only those where the law expressly provides mat tney snau oe paia in jbw ful money." And again, in speaking of the re sumption oi specie payments, he sayi "Tbe honor of the country, the good faith of the nation, the interesU ot the laborer, the rich and the poor, an classes, demand that we should resume specie paymenU as early as possible and nlaee all tbe obligations cf tbe people of the United States upon the solid basis of gold and silver coin." Sir, this theme becomes humiliating to every honest American mind. It fills with shame every honest, patriotic heart. Tbe naked fact confronU us at every step that no pledge however hi h. solemn, or'bindmg in law and morals, has been strong enough to com pel the authors of our financial legisla tion to obey it. No sense of national honor or good laun naa renraincu for a single moment tne anoriaiea avarice of idle interest bearing capital whenever ' it has been tempted, like some hungry, marauding animal, to break oyer the barriers erected between it and new fields of spoilage that lie be yond. The silver dollar came to us with the birth of our government., it was devised as a unit of value by rhomas Jefferson and adopted by Con gress in tbe dajs of Washington, Ham ilton and Morris. It stood as honored as gold through every stt rm that beat upon the government. It is associated with all our development, oar strengtn, our growth and our glory. With it as a currency, more than any other, tbe picket lines of civilization bave puanea westward. The pioneer la tne snaaow of the great forests or on the wide prairies, toiled to lay it by, one by one, until the coveted sum of one hundred lav before him. ' Then tightening tbe girths of his saddle, be rode with speed to tbe distant land otnee, where toe gov ernment toss bis one hundred silver dollars for eighty acres of land, which thenceforward became that most blessed spot of earth, a borne; a home where trees were planted, where cnuaren were born and grew to De men ana women and then in turn went frth , into the great world, stilt to the west, there to live over again in labor ana privation the lives ot tbe father and mother left behind. Tbe silver dollar is particularly the laboring man's dollar, as lar as he may deeire specie. When specie payments were authorized before toe war it was tbe favorite currency with the people, and it will be so again whenever a gen eral circulation of coin is obtained, if that shall ever happen. Throughout all tbe financial panics that have as sailed this country no man has been bold enough to raise his hand to strike it down : Jio man has ever dared to whisper of a contemplated assault upon it; and when tbe hour of its danger and destruction drew nigb, wnen the 12th day of February, 1873, approached, tbe day of doom to tbe American dollar, the dol ar of our fathers, bow silect was tbe work ot the enemy I Not a sound, not a word, do note of warning to tbe American people that tbe.r favorite coin was about to be destroyed as money ; that tbe greatest financial revolution ol modern times was in contemplation and about to be accomplished against their highest and dearest righu I Tbe tax payers of the United SUtes were no more notified or consulted on this mo mentous measure tban tbe slaves on a southern plantation before tbe war when their master made np his miod to increase their task or to change them from a corn field to a cotton field. Never since tbe foundation of this gov ernment baa a law of such vital and tremendous import, or indeed of any importance at all, crawled int our t-talule books so furtively and so noise. lessly as this. I.s enactment there was &i completely unknown to the people, and indeed to four-fifths of Ocngrees it self, as tbe presecce of a burglar In a bouse at midnight is to ita steeple? in mates. This was redered possible part y because the clandestine movement was ao utterly unexpected, and partly from tbe nature of the bill in which it' oe curred. Tbe silver dollar of American history was demonetized in an act en titled "An act revising and ameodiog the ltws relative to tbe mints, assay offices, and coinage of the United Staler." The avowed and ostensible nurpose ot this act is set lorlh by . Dr. Linderman, the director , of the mint, in his recent work on Money and L"gal Tender. After citing very - fully the legislation of this country on the sub ect of minU and coinage, he says : "There were, however, provisions of law, conflicting in their character, as to tbe relative powers and daties of the Sncrtttry of the Treasury and the director! of tbe mint. To remedy this a .d to consolidate coinage ensctments were the chief otjects of the act ap proved February 12, 1873, revising and amending the laws relative to tbe m nts, is-ny i ffice, and coinage of the U oiled States. This act embraces sxfv-seven sec tions, and fills twelve closely printed pages of the seventeenth volume of the United StitrfS statute al large, from this voluminous and prolix . measure, proclaiming, as it did, other and totally, difie'-i.t ! l i'U to acoompnsn, it oi ly necessary to silently omit the few words that f t nearly a hundred years had floated the ol 1 familiar dollar as a full l'gl leader down the stream of Time. This was done in the fifteenth section, which 1 quote in full in order that the people may see for themselves exactly bow this great wrong was ef fected. It reads as follows: "That the silver coins of the United States shall be a trade dollar, a half dollar or a fifty cent piece, a quarter dollar or twenty-five cent piece, agdirne or ten cent piec; and tbe weight of tbe trade dollar should be 420 grains troy: the weight of the halt dollar shall be twelve grains fcrammes) and one-half of a gram (gramme); the quarter dollar aod tbe uime shall be respectively one half and one-fifth of the weight of said half dollar: and said coins shall be legal tender at their nominal value for any amount not exceeding five dollars in anv one payment. Thus it will bo seen that in declaring what tbe silver coins of tbe United States should be, tbe dollar, so long im bedded in our history, was dropped literally throw away as useless; and another coin, styled a trade dollar, of no service to the people as legal tender, was inserted in it place; or, as the director of the mint expresses it: "Under the provisions of this act the coinage and issue was discontinued, of the silver dollar of 412 grains, the three cent silver piece, and tbe two cent bronze piece." And by a subsequent act cf Congress. July 22, 1876, the legal tender quality of tbe trade dollar for even the small amount of five dollars was repealed, and now it is not a legal tender lor any. thing, or any amount. But, sir, having pointed out the false pretenses under cover ot which the American silver dollar was eliminated from our mousy system, it yet remains to inquire into the real raasons for such an act. In th- first place bad silver failed in its functions as a specie basis anv more tban gold? Had it been found any less capable tban its twin metal in upholding a paper currency on which tbe commerce and business of tbe world baa been transacted since the beginning ot civilizttion? These two metals of gold and silver bave come down to us together, from tbe days of Abraham, Isaao and Jacob. They were in grat abundance and in high tavor when Israel built ber temple and adorned the city cf Jerusalem. Tbey crept along the shores and island of tbe Mediterranean hand in hand, as arbi trary factors in human affairs. Tbey spread over Europe, as inseparable al lies, during the dark and barbarons ages tnat miervenea Between tne downfall of Rome and the discovery of the art of printing, the revival of learn ing, in the fifteenth century. Tbe cupidity of man has delved into the earth, toiiea across tne stormy sua bnkea solemn treaties, sworn false oaths, murdered his fei-low-man, and bartered away bis sonl alike for them both. The Span iard and the Portuguese swept whole races in tbe West Indies, Mexico, Cen tral and South America,first into slave ry and then out of existence, in their accursed greed and thirst for gold and silver. Throughout all our colonial history these metals were nncea to gether ia an embrace that no convulsior conld tear asunder. And .when our government emerged, weary and blood stained from the revolution, our fatherr found them standing . together on the threshold as a mighty tradition of all the past. They were adopted together as our measure of values, because other nations had done the same. Tbey en tered their career as American money together, equal in dignity before the law. By the Constitution oi tne u niteo Sta'es tbey were introduced into each new incoming State of our expanding anion, on terms of absolute equality We find by article l.section lO.of that in strument, that "no State shall coin money, emit bills ot credit, make anything but gold and silver coin a len der in payment of debt." From that day to this I challenge everv page of American history to sho a aincla instance in wb'ich the silver dollar has not beeo as brave, as firm and aa reliable as the gold dollar. I challenge tbe sad records of every A nan cial alarm, panic, or crash that ever befell us to show where for a single day or hour silver was not as intrepid and fear'eas in the money markeU as gold From 1792 to 1873, from the coinage of thn American silver dollar to toe dav nf iu insidious destruction, eighty one years, gold and silver never fluc tuated in their relation to each other but a fraction over 3 per cent, and du ring most of that time silver money ranked hieher than gold money, and did so the day it was destroyed. It is true that both these metals, so precious in tbe traditions ot mankind, broke down at once when this Government was called on to fight for iu life, when the ultima' e and extreme necessity of the hour demanded a money stronger than them both, based on tbe confidence of tbe people that their Government would live and not die; yet wneu tney fell, tbev tell together. 4 either tbe one. nor the other, nor both united were sufficient to make even a reepectaDie ttrupcle for national existence, and they abandoned tbe field on the first roar of hostile cannon, out suver uiu not fie any sooner or get under cover anv Quicker than gold, it may men, x think, be safely assumed in the light of all experience that tne real reason nr demonetizing silver is not to be found in iu failure to be the peer, under all nirmm stances, in all ages, and in all nations, of the other precious metal, which has now become to strangely, so suddenly, and so surreptitiously ex a. ted in the eyes of the money power as the sole standard ot values. Pursuinir our ioauirv. therefore, on this point, we come next upon one therjrincioal reasons now assigned of for abandoning silver coin as money. It is true that the sincerity of this reason is open to the suspicion which always taints an argument brought forward as an afterthought to juslityan act wnicn evaded all discussioa at tne time oi nansap-e. but .nevertheless it shall be fairly considered, even at this late day It is now urged, with great vehemence, by tbe advocates of tne gold standard alone, that Decause cere tnu tuero European, monarchy, with tbe hardest worked and poorest paid peasantry on the face of the earth, nas panisneu su ver, we are called upon by our business relations to do the same, it is urzeo that we are to follow and not lead in ibe affairs of tbe world. According t thia argument, we are to trail in tbe fooU eps of governmenU whose princi pies we denounce, and whose laboring people are fleeing in constant streams from their shores 10 our own, iu orut to escape oppression aod starvation. Sir, no one disputes tbe fact that all civilized governments nave certain com. munities ot interest, but to my mind the American republic is less depend ent for its strength and prosperity on tbe conduct and policies of ether cations than anv other government now in ex. Utnncn. Nature in ber niott lavish mood lias conspired to make the Amtr'.. can people, in tact a well as in name, an independent people. Our p'ace on the map of tbe globe is an isolated one M iir htv oceans stretch out between us and all the firs -class power of world. What foreign neighbors the we have on our immediate borders are weak and unimportant. We are not only substintially alone as a p ilitical power on the North Amer.can conn nent. and separata oy long aitst-iucea 't from all the great nations oi toe eaitn, hut we Docseas within ourselves, in uu- failing abuLdance. tv.ry article and mi element of national weal.h and glory. Our vast domain will feed un counted millions; mountains of iron and of all other useful ores respond to every call of scientific progress, while thA intelligent induttry cf man. if not paralyzed by bad government, will foi ever supply all bis wants, comforts and luxuries. On such a th satre our groatett re-ource is self-reliance, and we bave hut litil) need cf examples or alliances furnished by less fortunate nations Admitting, however, the argument for the sake of meeting it, that our financial policy in regard to a specie baiia ought to be in harmony with the rect of the world, let us examine into the actual facU as tbey now exist i the var ous money systems or every people with whom we have tbe slightest r - . ti - - ! . ; commercial intercourse, uh buoi i the general trade and business of n lions fallen into such discredit that we are compelled to cast it aside in order to keep pace with a wide-scraad fioan cial revolution? Is it held in such dis honor as a medium of traffic through out the world that we can no longer UDhi 1 1 it with credit to ourselves? O tbe contrary a careful estimate shows tbal silver is an enormous and over whelming favorite. Of tbe entire trad ing and commercial population of tbe whole earth 696.250.000 more peopl bave silver alone as their standard of values, and transact alt their business upon it as a specie baais.tban those who bave gold alone tor similar purpoiei From the same source of information we learn that 744.200,000 more people use silver alone than use gold and silver both as their metalic currency. In this last statement I include the population of tbe United Bt.tssas using tbe dot tle standard, fur we shall return lo it al once, as far at least as a specie basis can now exist. The great fact, therefore, is tbat in the mighty bulk of intelligent mankind more than lour times as many people bave chosen silver as have chosen gold aod silver together. Tbe following table giving tne finan cial systems and tbe populations ot the various governmenU of the world win be found in tbe main correct: KATIOHS UBDXR GOLD ALONE. Population. Great Britain Canada.... Autiana... Portugal ...... s ,o , o 4,6X',iiO )r,-M',lO i 4,'iS vJOO 2,8V ... 6,t i', lO.UOO.ODO l,SO0,'U g,0O , Ml 4l,OU0,l ... 4,'46O,q0O Turkey in Europe and Aw Peraia ......... . Argentine Republic .. Kef Dt .. German Empif bvcdta .. i.son.oi-o 1,750,' -HI S3.-W ,'H.O No way..... uhdi. a pan Total . llfi.tS.OOu NATIONS TJBTDBR BILVKK ALONE. Population R nmia B'.ouyHiu Au-tri . . S ," , Centra! Amt-nCA.. ,'', Rcq under.., . - l'p Chi.... - ,.4io.. 0 ,i ailia ... ju,i. ,o.ki M-x cu ..... 9,00 .1X10 i.W.0,001 S.T0. ,. 1, u ,uu x t il mo 3.70 ,noi 1,41 ,UOU United K la lea of olombia Tilpoli...... Holl.n.i Venccutl Total 87,7i0,'M! HA TION S UN DIB GOLD ANP SILVER. PopuUnon. Bel t um ,. . '.",'"" B liiia, I, S O,' Franca- Grmo.. . l,Mi,Mi ltalr... .. . f,!M.U J 8 pa a .. 1' ,m,o i . S.70O, swll se lnil. (Jailed fitatee. , 4,o0u,O Total lsa,5v oi It will be seen from this statement that silver coin, as money, not only meets the desires ot lour-UiLua oi tne human race, but that those who use it as a standard occupy more than three quarters of the inhabited parts of the globe. Germany is perhaps prema turely placed in tne list oi naaons using gold alone. It is true she has attempt ed to adopt the gold standard.but there are still two hundred millions of silver currency in the hands of her people, and tbey are reluctant to give it up ana see it driven away troui latnenanu Whether the empire will be entirely 8ucoe68ful in depriving- its subjects ol thi favorite money yet remains to pe proven. In view of all the foregoing tacts, however: in view of the history and condition of the world on this ques tion, the enemies of the suver dollar in the United States who. havinsr first de stroyed it.seek now to justify themselves bv slandering tbe reputation of its metal in distant lands, must stanu De fore their iniured countrymen covered with shame and confusion. Tbey are utterly overwhelmed and beaten from their position Dy tue general testimony of the civilized races of men, and we are left at this point to follow them next to their final and in tact real rea son for their assaults upon silver money. Sir. I touch now upon an issue as old as human society and as universal as the loaning or money at interest and the investment of capital for in come. Two classes nave existed in evety age of history on the question of money. All such as plow, sow, and reap; who spin, weave, and make mer chandise for sale; who manage and work the caverns of coal and iron, and the blast furnaces nd forges; who con struct railroads, build ships, and found cities; all such as are in any way push ing on the cause of progress and ma terial development and who desire to keep their capital, whatever it may be, and especially that greatest of all capi tal, the bone and muscle of the laborer, actively employed, constitute one class. Those who have stepped aside from the active moving column of affairs and withdrawn themselves and all they own from the trade and business of the world, intending thenceforward to fasten their idle wealth on the pro ductions of labor as a consumer, and not a J an assistance, constitute the other. Of these two classes, those who compose the first desire money to be plentiful and cheap, for they are Denmark. working to obtain it, while those who Jijisiberable, isilone in this coin, the compose the latter, desire money to teTnative8 preterrinjlt to the Mexican scarce ana dear. Decause tuey mreau y have it in abundance to loan and to invest at high rates of interest and profit. And it was in the real and actual interest of this latter powerful class that silver was demonetized in February. 1873. not because it was less valuable as money than irold, nor be- ranae such a chancre was demanded by the policies of lorelsrn nations, but Rlmnfv because retired capital desired r.n diminish the amount of money of every kind circulating in the hands of the people. Silver was selected as the victim for sacrifice on that occasion, because it was thought, on account of certain circumstances yet to be noticed, that it could be more successfully assailed than the other kinds of money then in existence. The managers of the great money cwntrea in this country and in Europe saw with avaricious alarm the bright streams ot silver beginning to increase in volumes and value as they Mowed from the mouths of our mines, and now we hear from their angry throats, and from an apparently still angrier newspaper press which they control, a cry without ceasing against silver inflation arising from au overproduction of the metal. They have heretofore filled the world with a hostile clamor mainly against a paper currency not immediately convertible into coin of intrinsic value, but It now appears that there can be, in their own amiable language, an insane in flation of currency which has this very intrinsic value itself. We have heard much talk to prove that gold and silver are only the real money, and they have an absolute value as such every where and at all times; but we now sliscover that even these precious metals may become more abundant tban is agreea ble to those who want the purchasing power of money increased hy lessen ing the quantity in circulation until fifty dollars will buy in a farm worth a thousand under the foreclosure of a mortgage. Is It true, however, that for the genuine interests of the Amer ican people, for their advancement In trade and development, and for the prosperity of our commerce throughout the world, too much silver has been produced in the United States or anv where else? Has silver, as now claimed, ever threatened to pour Into the channels of business such floods and torrents as would sweep away all the landmarks of safety? We will examine this question. The history of the production of the precious metals Is one of great and pre vailing interest. Although they have been arbitrarily determined upon as the money of mankind, yet it has never been possible for the highest human in telligence to ioreteit tneir suppiy or to sav with certainty that their pro duction will not fail al tog-ether. The quantity of a circulating medium suffi cient to meet the legitimate demands of trade can be estimated, but who has ever been able to look into the mines and declare how far their veins of ore extend or hew soon they will cease to yield? Who has ever been able to point out where new mines may be opened Into the hidden riches ol the earth to take the place of those that are worn out, sterile and barren? The re sult has been that while the precious metals have been declared the standard of values, they have themselves always been an unknown quantity, and the ir regularity, uncertainty and insuffici ency of their production have caused frenuent and crushing disasters in all countries and in every period -of his tory, and have often compelled the strongest governments ot ancient and mouera uuies iu cuuicijr them. It is not my purpose, however, to dwell on this point further than to meet the argument bated upon an al leged over-production of silver in re cent years. From a report made not long since by a committee in the British parliament it appears, as nearly as can be estimated, tnat tne entire production of silver throughout the world during the last twentv-live yerrs has reached about $,400,000,000. The increase in its production during that period aroe from about $40,000.- 000, in 1852, to $80,000,000, in 1875, and the annual amount produced at this time may be placed at $70,000,000. Of these amounts South America, Mexico and the United Stales produced all excepUne about $10,000 000 a year. arising irom the silver resources of all other countries. In our own country the developement of this great agency of national prosperity has all taken place in the las eighteen years, sub stantially in the last ten. The following estimate, made by the commissioner tor mining statistics, shows the annual production ot lver and iu increase In the United Su t js: 1869 is- o. IfM',' O 861, 86 :, .......... ,1','0 ....- 4,54i,'iO ,4 jIHNl ii,es,H)0 4v4l','0 ........... r, ,) .. 8, -a o,io .......... SH.TfOOO I.',!" ,IIUO 3 .' '. ' SOU 14 186U (avaia), iaTo, 1871 Itfli, 87S 1874 187ft Estimating the productions ot l7u and 1877 the same as 1875, and we find tnat the entire amount of silver yield ed by the mines of the United States since they begnn to pay lor working tnem. nas readied Dut a ti ine over inu comparatively small sum ot" $2."0,000,- 000. This is less tiian one-nan uie amount of our present volume of cur rency; yet when those who are inter ested iu making and keeping a scarci ty of money in circulation, noticed an Increaae of only $12,000,000 from 1870 to 1872, they took the nl.iriu which re sulted in the act of 1873, proscribing and outlawing it from the companion ship of gold as money. It will not do to say that the demand for silver had failed, for aside from what our own people need at home, the demand from abroad was so great that In the very act demonetizing it here, pi oviuion was made for the coinage of a dollar which we found necessary for our foreign trade. It was a dollar of the weight of 420 grains troy, and the Secretary of the Treasury, in his recent report says: "This provision was made at a time when such a dollar was worth in the market 102 12 in goldand was design ed for the use of trade in Uliina, where silver was the only standard." The great demand for this coin.espe cially in our trade with China, is shown by "rejorts made by the two leading foreign banks of China, the Oriental Bank and the II on 2 Konjrand Shanghai Banking corporation, dard respective ly January 30 and 31, lS77,andlurnish ed by the United States consulate at Hong Kong, to the Secretary ot the Treasury. 1 find these reports quoU;d by the director ot the mint, and lex tract from them the following state ments: 'Hie United States trade dollar has been well received in China, and is ea gerly welcomed in those parts of the couutry where the true value of the coin is known. It is a legal tender at the ports of Foochoo and Canton, in China, and also at Saigon and Singa pore; and although not legally current in this colony, it is anxiously sought after by the ChineRe,and in the bazaars it is seldom to be purchased. Iu proof of the estiuiai ion in which the trace dollar is held in the south of China, we need only slate tliat the bulk of the di rect exchange business between Ilong Konir and San Francisco, which is very aoiiar. iaie auvices irom i r uuv.irr eo renort that so irreat is the demand for trade dollars lor shipment to China that the California mint is unequal to the task of tnring out the coin tust enough to satisfy requirements. My opinion is that ultimately It will ho current all over China. It la the best coin that has ever been Imported, and being produced at the fountain head of silver, can be laid down more cheaply than any other dollar. China requires many mlil.ons of dol lars annually, and while the clean Mexican dollar will be imported for the north of China, the trade dollar will be Imported for the south. I would roughly estimate that the San Francisco steamers will bring from four to six lacs of trade dollar (Irom four to six hundred thousand) eaJi fortnightly trip all the ear round." The Secretary of the Treasury also informs us that since the trade dollar was authorized, it ha b en coined to the Urge amount of $30,710,400, mainly to meet this and other foreign demand lor silver money. It Is true, however, that he further states that the export demand for the trade di liar has now almost if not quite ceased. It is not strange tliat this should be so. when this government has done all In its power to dishonor it at home; first limiting it as a legal tender to the In significant sum ot $5, and hastening soon afterward to strip it of even this small badge of respectability. Distant people, naturally suspicious of our institutions, would necessarily reject a coin on which we ourselves have placed such a stigma of disgrace, however great, as we have Btntn, may Ixs their demand for silver money. In fact, no artifice, no cunning device bus bwn spared to bring the silver dollar Into contempt and to drive it out of exist ence,although the A uiericin peopleand the pe-ople of ail lands and every form, of civilization plead for its restoration U favor and to an ample circulation. If there are some, however, who still think that these assaults on silver were Inspired by any other motive than the fear of too much money, allow me to recall an Incident In financial history full of teaching on this point. When the revelation of gold took place in California, and on the other side of the world In Australia about the same time, an impulse was given to the pro gress of mankind greater than has been produced by any other one event since Columbus discovered America. It quickened every energy of labor, aroused all thejstreat indriistries every where into new and sturlling activity, revived the drooping ails of commerce in every sea, and sent the loaded car avans of railroad transportation flying in every direction ever the face of the earth. The whole world re joiced with one exception. The creditor class In every clime beneath the sun looked oil in sullen distrust and dread. And in 1850, when the production of gold hud reached its highest point, and when it was supposed that it would continue to increase, this class broke forth In the different countries ot Europe In favor of demonetizing gold, because the supply was making money too plentiful De Ojulncy, Chevalier, and other writers, made earnest and elaborate arguments to show that the increase in the flow of gold was so great that soon it would be within the easy reach of all classes, and then its power to purchase labor and property In large quantities for very small sums would be forever gone. Germany and Austria, and some other European gevern- ments, heeded those arguments, and In 1857 actually demonetized gold in or der to maintain the scarcity of money. The reason why this question did not seriously agitate the financial circles of tbe United States is to be found in the. fact that at the time we had no great creditor class in this countiy; we had no stupendous national debt held as an Investment for fixed incomes; no such State, municipal and corporation debts as bave since tilled all the stock mar-