Search America's historic newspaper pages from 1770-1963 or use the U.S. Newspaper Directory to find information about American newspapers published between 1690-present. Chronicling America is sponsored jointly by the National Endowment for the Humanities external link and the Library of Congress. Learn more
Image provided by: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library, Urbana, IL
Newspaper Page Text
<■ 6 X ‘Starve 'em into submission’ is Hoover’s advice on Yugoslavia Herbert Hoover stopped In Chicago this week long enough to say that he had been on a three-week fishing trip and was ‘•completely out of touch with what was going on in the world.” Nevertheless, the famine relief “expert” had strong opinions on how to solve the problems of the starving Balkan people.” * | “America must stop sending food to Yugoslavia," said Hoover. V ; Strait facts: Why the Dardanelles crisis? : To any citizen of the Soviet Union, the issue of the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles (which make up the famous Straits) produces long echoes from the depths of Russian history. Russians fought a war in the Black Sea ninety years ago over the Straits. Innumerable treaties and peace parleys of the nine teenth century record the ebb and flow of Russian hopes that a permanent settlement of thvs question could be achieved which would safeguard the vulnerable Russian position in the Black Sea. The Dardanelles to a Russian recalls far more acute memories than the Panama Cana l to the average American, or even the Suez to the average Briton. Until very recently, the Black Sea was the Soviet Union’s only outlet to the world's waterways, except for her bottled position in the Pacific facine a hostile Japan. * =» # THE importance of this water passage to the Black Sea for the U.S.S.R. needs little demonstra tion, for it was through the D?r danelles that most of the arm : es of intervention reached the Cri mea and the Caucasus. Both Britain and France, in the secret treaties of May, 1915, had promised the Tsar that not only the Straits but Constantinople and other Turkish lands would be ceded. Both powers took advantage of the Soviet revolution to go back on their pledges, though they proceeded to carve up much of the Turkish Empire for them selves after Versailles. Thus, from the Ruussians’ viewpoint, refusal of an adequate settle ment of the Straits regime today might be called an attempt to deny them the victory not only ol this war but also of the last one. The present Allied position on the Straits is a denial of equality of treatment of the So viet Union and a deliberate at tempt to perpetuate a weakness of the Soviet strategic position. # * * IN 1923, the chief point at is sue was the right of foreign ships * * * A STAR COLUMN ★ ★ ★ By JOHANNES STEEL WHAT does Russia want? Conversations in Paris with the highest competent au thorities have F satisfied m e /*■[ » - that the axiom J -and keystone rSi. fk of Soviet for ifl P eign policy is *, fv: the insistence \ jm- that friendly relations with 'TR'V the Soviet Un ■ ‘ on can exlst only when it is fully under stood by all the powers concerned that these relations are based on the principle of full equality among nations. All powers must be equal mem bers of society. The time of con descension to Russia has passed. INTER NATIONAL S C ENE to enter the Black Sea, which the Soviets, with their memories of intervention, opposed bitterly. It was finally agreed to let the then revolutionary Turkey remain in sole control ot the Straits under the jurisdiction of Britain, France, the U.S.S.R., Romania. Bulgaria, and Japan. In 1936, this convention was modified to give Turkey the right to fortify the Straits. But in this war Turkey was a neutral whose entire policy fa vored Hitler, to put it mildly. Turkey did not cooperate with the United Nations at all—until the very last moment. •» 9 * NEITHER is there any doubt that Turkey violated the Mon treaux convention by allowing Italian and German war vessels into the Black Sea. It is public knowledge that German and fas-| cist Italian operations in Roma- i nia and southern Crimea were assisted by these warships, which passed the Straits in violation of the Montreaux convention. As early as the Potsdam con ference of July 1945, the great powers recognized that the old convention was outdated; some form of internationalization —| that is, removing Turkey’s sole) right to fortify and control ship passage in wartime—would be necessary. The Soviet Union has now pro posed a modification of the ac cord which is similar to the American proposal except lor certain key points. It is agreed that commercial vessels of all na tions shall have full freedom of passage in peacetime; it is also agreed that the warships of the Black Sea powers shall have sud freedom of movement in war time; finally, it is agreed that the non-Black Sea powers are barred from the Straits in war time; except as definitely spec! fied. * # # THE disagreement arises on the following points: The U.S.S.R. proposes that only the Black Sea countries, which include Turkey but exclude the U. S. and Britain and France, The Soviet outlook The U. S. air force and navy, tremely sensitive and has great national pride. Its representatives take great pains to point out that the Soviet Union is not the old Czarist Russia. Os Czarist Rus sia, say that it was a colos sus with feet of clay. Today, the leaders of the now Russia are passionate in their be lief that the feet of the Soviet state are not made of clay, but that they merge with the ground. By this the Soviet leaders mean that they are close to the people. It is false to assume that Rus sia's leaders do not respect Western democracy. On the con trary, they have the highest respect for Western democracy and especially great respect for American democracy. • # • Aii editoriol Byrnes backs German reaction It is dar.jerous to world peace to con fuse the Byrnes plan for Germany, offer ed last week, with the Molotov plan sug gested July 10. On the surface, both ask a unified Germany. The difference is in the how and when. Byrnes wants a centralized govern ment. but he wants it with the old forces in power that handed Hitler and a cat astrophe to the world. Molotov wants the complete denazification of Germany and the destruction of every facet of fascism before a centralized government is form ed. Recently Gen. Louis Clay announced the new U. S. policy of granting amnesty to young Nazis, the trained backbone of Hitlerism who will rule Germany tomor row unless curbed. The Byrnes plan would virtually shove them into control. Meanwhile, a strong campaign is unlar vvby in Washington circles to either drop or limit prosecution of Nazi industrialists as war criminals and to rehabilitate Ger man industry. Byrnes has gone on record as opposing a second international war crimes thial of industrialists. In this he has the backing of Supreme Court Just ice Jackson, chief U. S. prosecutor at Nuremburg. The Big Money Boys who financed the Nazis are being left alone Gen. Marshall being ’used’ as tool of Chinese dictator By ANNA LOUISE STRONG PEIPING—(ALN) —Gen. George C. Marshall, President Truman’s special envoy, is losing face n China. Chiang Kai-Shek, China's dictator, probably intends this because Chiang is gaining the face that Marshall loses. One straw shows how the wind blows. In the hot, humid sum mer of central China, Chiang has ostentatiously withdraw n to the cool mountain resort of Ruling, while eivil war rages in half a dozen provinces. Mar shall swelters in Nanking, shall actually govern the Straits. It further propose? that the So viet Union and Turkey shall jointly fortify the Straits. The American proposal—which Turkey has rushed to support maintains that jurisdiction should not lie exclusively with the Black Sea powers, though cified. who would control it is not spe- Tr.e United States further in sists that Turkey shad remain in NATURALLY, they have their own definition of democracy much different from our defini tion, but these Soviet leaders are insistent in saying that if by democracy we understand the collective will of the people, than in that sense the Soviet Union is in no wise weaker as a democ racy or less of a democracy than any other nation. The Russian leaders want this accepted as a political axiom. They expect the world to grant it without ques tion. What they regret most is that on a philosophical and political basis there has been no attempt at understanding or even discus sing the Western concept as well as the Russian concept of demo cracy. It is false to assume that the and under the Byrnes plan would be free to back any available fascist. It must be remembered at all times that our foreign policy, as transmitted by Byrnes, is dictated by our monopolies and trusts. They had strong links with German cartels as World War II began. Trial of the German industriajists would expose to the world the part played by our Big Money Boys in bringing on this global conflict. American monopolists want their old German pals to get strong again. Fight-* / ing for the rehabilitation of German ca pital is Brig. Gen. William H. Draper Jr., head of the economic division of the U. S. Military government in Germany, who was recruited from the Wall Street bank ing firm of Dillon, Read which saved the cause of reaction by helping revive Ger man industry after World War I. History is about to repeat itself, for Draper’s announced plans are to sell German manufactured goods in America as a means of reviving German industry after World War 11. U. S. firms are interested and stand ready to buy immediately. This, then, is the our real policy in Germany. It reveals anti-democratic farces that would rule the Byrnes ver sion of a unified Germany. meeting with lesser generals. He gets nowhere, so from time to time he makes the trio to Killing—three hours by plane plus six by sedan chair up a mountain. The Chinese point out that this sole right of fortification on the thesis that in case of aggression, defense would lie with the Unit ed Nations Security Council an> way. It is plain that the larger issue in conneet’on with the Straits is whether the Soviet Union shall be accorded the same right of equality as a great power in de termining I .t security needs as the United States takes for granted at Panama. leaders of the Soviet Union be- j lieve that they have created the! perfect state. They rather see the- Soviet Union as a steadily grow I ing organism. They take great 1 pride in what has been achieved I so far. They are satisfied that’ during the past twenty years thei country has moved ahead three; centuries. #* t * AT THE same time, they are extremely conscious of the fact I that the Russian nation has far j from completed the tasks before; it, nor achieved all of its politi j cal ideals and social objectives, ; They derive great excitement; and passionate satisfaction from ' their belief and conviction that j, the Soviet state has taught the Russian people to find them-j selves; that from an illiterate, in j i ert mass, from an inhuman clod, j they have molded a vibrant humanity. ' is one way that Chiang has of showing that he is the boss. Chiang’s game is to stay aloof in Ruling while his generals make war. When and if he gains the territory he wants, he will 'allow” Marshall to make peace on the basis that Chiang’s terri torial gains are consolidated. Chiang is well known as an ex pert in making his allies serve his own aims. * * * MAYBE Gen. Marshall has it coming to him. America built up Chiang. A year ago, when the war with Japan ended, Chiang's forces were locked up in west ern China with so many hostile Chinese between them and the seaboard that they had no way of getting out. Local Chinese forces were ready to disarm the Japanese and make Chiang a highly honored, but not too pow erful, national president. The U.S. air force and navy, at a cost of some $300,000,000 lo American taxpayers carried Chi ang's troops to Shanghai, No th I China and Manchuria. They stiil support them there, without any pledge from Chiang of a demo era 1 ic government. Nobody really knows w’hat U. S. policy in China is, despite- the State Department’s insistence that it is “still the same.” Mar shall appears to have one policy and the U. S. Navy, for instance, seems to have another. Chiang knows that some Amer icans want naval and r.ir bases in China for a possible war against the Soviet Union. Chiang is willing to sell, but his price is military dictatorship in China, upheld by American loans Chiang figures that if Marshall won’t meet his terms, maybe the U.S. * Navy will. 5 THE CHICAGO STAR, SEPTEMBER V h 191>6