Search America's historic newspaper pages from 1770-1963 or use the U.S. Newspaper Directory to find information about American newspapers published between 1690-present. Chronicling America is sponsored jointly by the National Endowment for the Humanities external link and the Library of Congress. Learn more
Image provided by: Mississippi Department of Archives and History
Newspaper Page Text
□ LIVE STOCK AND DAIRY. □ I WHY WK NEED MORE LIVE STOCK. The One Way to Permanently Main tain Soil Fertility. Messrs. Editors: It is a well-es tabllshed principle of good farming that there should he at least one head of stock, including cattle, cows, horses and mules, for each acre of feed stuffs, and one hog for each of such animals. This in the West and North where for at least one-half the time every thing has to be stabled and fed. While our principal crop, cotton, might ordinarily make some differ ence in tills rule, yet our longer sea sons of growth, enabling us to raise two or three crops in one year, more than offsets any difference that tnn raising of cotton might make. Then, too, when we raise cotton, we raise for each bale at least 100 pounds of the most valuable feedstuff, cotton seed meal, containing nearly as much protein as Is to he found in an acre of corn yielding twenty bushels. If anything then, this proportion of live stock on our Southern farms should he Increased. As it Is, we have half thin many. The Importance of more and bet ter live stock upon the farm Is all the more Impressed upon ns when we remember that these live stock, instead of taking fertility therefrom, will actually add thereto. We all ap preciate the fact that more humus means better soils. Wo also know that, than through live stock, there is no more economical way of getting humus. The old adage of raising more live stock to get more manure to Improve our land to raise more feed to feed more live stock to make more manure, etc., is not far from true. Within certain limits, this cir cle can go on almost Indefinitely. The kind of live slock to get depends largely upon the Individual taste of the man. The kind that It Is easiest to get and that will probably pay bet ter than any other Is “Ills Hogshlp.” As Dr. Knapp so happily puts It; "The hog is the greatest fellow to run his snout under a mortgage, root It up, ami bite off the tap root that you ever saw,” and he doesn’t get con ceited over bis ability or tired of do In It. either. Thea It is about time that, if we must work mules, wo were at least raising them ourselves. One or two good mares to he used for light work and for driving, will return a hand some profit In n mule colt apiece each year and I needn’t say what this colt would he worth. Those who bought mules this year have a pretty definite Idea. 1). N. BARROW. Treatment for a Wormy Horae. I linve bought a very poor horse, and ho is awfully wormy. PleaBe give me a remedy for the worms. They are small white worms—also how to feed him to fatten him up. I. L. S. Kditorlal Answer.—There Is no one remedy that Is best for all sorts of worms which Infest the Intestines ef the horse; but the following is perhnps as good and safe as any for use by the average horse owner: Reduce the feed or withhold It en tirely for 2 4 or 3G hours, and then feed very sparingly for several days longer. Give one quart of raw lin seed oil and 3 tablespoonfuls of tur pentlne after the horse has fasted 2 4 hours, and 2 4 hours later glvt one pint of raw linseed oil and i tablespoonfuls of turpentine. Repea this smaller dose once a day until th( bowelB move freely. After the bowels have moved free ly continue the light feeding for a few days longer and give twice a day one dram each of dry sulphate of Iron and powdered nux vomica; continue this for ten days or two weeks. To obtain the best results, a horse should probably be fed almost all he will eat up clean three times a day. If he Is fed all he will eat up and still want just a little more, the best condition Is obtained. This, of course, Is only to be done after he has been gradually brought up to a full ration. To get a horse on full feed should take two or three weeks. We are not told what feeds are available, but if the hay ration can be half pea vines and half corn fod der or grass hay, this should be sat isfactory. If no greater variety can be furnished, we suggest 5 parts of corn to one of cottonseed meal as the concentrate feed. llepraved Appetite. I have a mule that eats dirt, and I think eats his excrement, too. Will you please tell me what to do to break him from the habit? I keep rock salt in his box all the while. I feed on corn and hay. Would it be best for me to mix some oats with the corn? A. E. C. Editorial Answer.—The habit of eating dirt indicates a disordered di gestion, or that the animal is not getting what it needs in the feed. We suppose "corn and hay” means some sort of grass hay. If this be the case, the ration is entirely out of balance. Some legume hay, or some such feed as cottonseed meal or oats should be substituted. We would suggest equal quantities of grass and legume hays, and one part of cottonseed meal to 3 parts each of corn and oats. Or if oats are too high-priced, 1 part of cottonseed meal to 5 parts of corn. Care must be taken not to over-feed. Give two or three times a day, for ten days or two weeks, the following: l ounce of hyposulphite of soda, 1 dram dry sulphate of iron, 1 dram powdered nux vomica. C.lve the Hog What He Wants. We believe It would be a good thing If In every hog yard there was a supply of charcoal or slaked lime, salt and wood ashes, preferably mix ed, soft coal or soft coal cinders, and bone meal lying around, whether In a self-feeder or some other way al lowing them free access to it. In that case each hog can be trusted to take what he wants. His natural In stincts are a good deal safer guide than the judgment of the owner or of any one else. Corncob charcoal will answer as well as wood charcoal, and perhaps a little better; and the yard will look all the better if you rake up the cobs, char them, put them in a box, and let the hogs have all they want of them. There should be no difficulty about having a box of air-slaked lime anywhere. We never knew a hog to root just for the fun of the thing, or with purely malicious or mischievous in tent. It was fluding something that it needed, whether worms for variety or some mineral ingredient. The best way to keep them from rooting is to satisfy what is apparently an abnormal but really a normal appet tite.—Wallace’s Farmer. If I gain only an average of $1.00 i a head for the cattle and hogs which I feed and sell, it pays me.—D. ■ Rankin. V *- A / * v A JUNK PILE MOUNTAIN OF VERY EXPENSIVE CREAM SEPARATOR EXPERIENCE (A sample pile of scrapped competitive separator bowls—the frames being I broken up in the field to save freight on same). II During the year 1909 more than 10,000 enlightened and disgust ed American users of poor or wornout competitive makes of separa tors threw them aside and replaced them with new DE LAVAL CREAM SEPARATORS on top of 8,500 having done so in 1908, 7,000 in 1907 and 5,000 a year for several years before, or at least 50,000 within ten years. If it were possible to put these 50,000 machines into one huge i “junk pile”, as they have in fact gone into a thousand "junk piles”, it would make a veritable mountain of cream separator experience, as impressive as Pikes Peak and representative of as much costly | acquired separator experience as though it were a great mine of gold or silver. These 50,000 “near” and “just as good” cream separators cast aside to be replaced with De Laval machines within ten years, and so many of them within a couple of years, cost their users at least three and one-half millions of dollars in the first place and prob ably wasted three times that much in quantity and quality of pro duct, excessive repairs and excessive time required to put the milk through them while they were used, or a total of at least fifteen millions of dollars, and more likely twenty-five millions. wnat nas happened In America in this way has in the same time been doubled throughout the rest of the world, so that the total ag gregates twice as much, or perhaps fifty millions of dollars. And worse still, this accounts only for those users who have recognized the facts and remedied them. There are thousands more users of in ferior separators who have yet to do so, and unfortunately some yet embarking anew on this expensive separator experience of their ; own. : These figures are monumental, but they deal with a problem of enormous importance to everyone who has cream to separate from milk, which the average man can better appreciate put in this col lective way than he can when applied to himself alone, ^though It means exactly the same thing one way or the other. These facts are all capable of proof to the man who cares to have them proved and who doesn’t want to contribute at his own ex pense to this enormous and ever-increasing “junk pile” mountain of cream separator experience, or, better still, to the man who has \ been doing so and thinks it about time to stop. To such owners we would say that the De Laval Company will this year continue its “trade allowances” for these old machines, be cause of the opportunity such exchanges afford in an educational way for the most practical illustration possible of the difference be tween good and poor separators, and thus putting a stop to the sale of others like them in the same neighborhood. Any desired “trade allowance” information may always be had of the nearest De Laval local agent or of the Company directly. THE DEHLAVAL SEPARATOR.*COMPANY 166-167 Broadway 42 E. Madison Street Drunnm & Sacramento St«. NEW YORK CHICAGO SAN tRANCISCO 173-177 William Street 14 & 16 Princes* Street 1016 Western Avenue MONTKEAL WINNIPEG SEATTLEl