Newspaper Page Text
1 1 NO 125. Published weekly at Cleveland, Ohio. Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll CUSSEDNESS Our idea of governmental cussednees is the prevention of shipment of medical supplies to a country with which ,(we are not at war" in other words Russia, iiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniiiiiikiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii CLEVELAND, OHIO, FRIDAY, JULY 2nd, 1920. Address all null to 3207 Clark At, Cleveland, O. $1.50 A YEAS DEBS AND THE SOCIALIST PARTY At the beginning of the year 1919 the Socialist Pairty was an organization of nearly 100,000 members. It had ae part of its membership the most advanced revolutionary elements in this country. It was an organization of powerful potentialities in the class struggle. In the early months of that year the struggle between the Left Wing revolutionists and tb Right Wing reformists como to a head. The Wing won the party elections by overwhelmin Major ities. If the Left "Wing representative were f itted to taike office it meant the reorganization of ti Vrty and the ousting of all non-revolutionary elemt4 In this crisis the Right Wing leaders of the 'V'-y 1 ft 1.1 . i 1 - i(lL in control oi tne party macnmerv overrode an. constitutional provisions and rules of the party expelled the Left Wing. The issue between the two groups was a fundamental issue of principle which could not be compromised. Either one group or the other had to leave the party. The Right Wing held the party machinedy and used its power to hold the party. Rut in expelling the Lef t Wing the party official dom sapped the very life of the party. It was the Left Wing elements within the party that had been its strength. The party finances came largely from this element. When the situation clarified, after the Sep tember conventions, the Right Wing officialdom of the party found that it controlled the party, but that the membership had disappeared. By the Fall of 1919 the party membership of 100,000 of the previous spring had been reduced to a bare 15,000. It was an empty victory. Not all of the 75,000 to 85,000 members who left the party, affiliated with the Communist parties. A largo element, disgusted by the reactionary trend of the Socialist Party and the split in the Communist movement, remained outside of any organization. In January came the raids directed against the Communist parties and the reorganization of these parties as underground organizations. Here again members of both parties, the weak-kneed and hesitat ing, dropped out, adding to the former membership of , the Socialist Party which was not affiliated with 'any "2fPgfettSutiu,u: - ' The situation in the early spring of this year was that there were from fifteen to twenty thousand Right Wing members in the Socialist Party and an equal number of Communists, willing to risk anything for their principles, in the underground organizations of the two Communist parties. There was the difference, however, that while the Socialist Party was drifting toward complete disintegration, the Communists were solid, militant organizations. By their attitude toward the Left Wing the Socialist party leaders had lost the confidence of a large block of membership, which, while not yet Com munist, resented the reactionary trend of the party Up to the time of the Albany trial the St. Louis war program and the war record of the party had been the means of holding some of its membership al though the membership which forced the unwilling leaders to adopt this program had long ago left the party. But with the complete repudiation at Albany this asset was gone. A new block of members within the party threatened to revolt. The future look-xl black. It was to meet this situation that the reactionary Right Wing leaders appealed to the magic name of Dobs. The Hillquits, Stedmans and Bergers of the Social ist Party have never liked Dobs. In the controversies within the party prior to the split, dating back for ten years, whenever Debs had spoken he had aligned himself against these leaders. In the 1912 convention of the party, in which the last previous nomination of Debs was made, they had fought against his nominat ion and had tried to foist upon the party Seidel and a Socialism that talked about sewer building as its great achievement. Debs was nominated only after it became apparent that the militant rank and file of the convention could not be forced to swallow Seidel and Sowers. The 1920 nomination of Debs through the influ ence of these leaders is merely a political trick. TIi rough this nomination they hope to rehabilitate the Socialist Party- They do not iikc Debs. They do not want Debs. But they are ready to swalW Debs in order to have a party and they expect that the magic name of Debs will again rally to the support of the party those elements which have been unaffiliated place, and even to break into the Communist ranks. a , Does Debs willingly lend himself to this political game! That is a question which is in the mind of many revolutionary workers. The Right Wing Socialist leaders have tried to create the impression that Dobs is fully informed in regiard to the developments in the party since his im prisonment and that he accepted the nomination of the; Right Wing with a complete realization of its meaning. This is part of the game to use his prestige tor the rebuilding of the party. Debs, knows all the Socialist Party and its leadership were he outside of prison and fully informed, at the same time he is not a Communist in fundamental understanding. Emotion ally and through his revolutionary spirit he is with the Left, but not through understanding and accept ance of Communist principles. What then shall be the attitude of the revolution ary workers toward tho candidacy of Eugene V. Debs. There is but one answer. Dobs may be ever so dear to us because of this past services to the movement. We may still admire taits and Debs is with the Socialist Partv, tliereforel f. t j i c t i n . , ,. , , . . him for his unwavering stand in his Canton speech the Communist attack upon the party is made up of ie& and calumnies, is their argument. ' THE FACT IS DEBS DOES NOT KNOW. He does not understand the depth to which the Socialist Party has sunk in its repudiation of Revolutionary Socialism. He does not know all the facts about the Albany defense and its abject apology to the peanut politicians of the New York legislature for being even suspected of standing for those things which Debs upholds, particularly the St. Louis Avar program. What little information Debs has secured about the and during his trial. We may respect him for his unshakable devotion to the w.mse of the workers, which has characterized his utterances since he has been in prison. In the past he has been tho spiritual leader of the revolution and as such we may still give him our love and admiration. While our attitude toward him personally can well remain unchanged if we understand that he acted without full knowledge or a full realization of the meaning of his acceptance of the Socialist Party nomination, as tho candidate of the Socialist Party recent acts of the Socialist Partv convention made Dobs has no claim unon us. It is the social revolution with any organization since the split in the party took would quickly repudiate the present position of the bim hesitate and in accepting the nomination of the party he made tho qualification that in doing so he did not intend to accept anything that would be a compromise of his previous utterance on the matter of Socialist principles. This statement as to Debs' attitude is not based on hearsay. It is made after more than an hour's talk with Debs, which took place since he accepted the Socialist nomination. Debs permitted his name to go before the Socialist convention, hoping that his candidacy would serve as the means of reuniting the former factions of the Socialist Party. The belief that his candidacy could reunite these factions is in itself evidence that Debs dofs not understand the great difference in principles that divide them. He has not been in touch with the drift to the Right by the Socialist Party leaders and ih drift to the Left by the Communists. jn might as well be said frankly, that while Debs that we are working for and principles determine our course of action. When loyalty to our principles and loyalty to an individual clash the individual must be sacrificed. No revolutionary Socialist will support the Social ist Party because Debs is its candidate. Has not every revolutionary Socialist often declared that he fights for principles and not for individuals? The principles of the Socialist Party are potentially those of the Ebert Scheideman Nosike counter-revolution in Ger many. At Albany tho Socialist defense came pretty near to declaring it so. Debs' name cannot cover the reactinary character of tho Socialist Party. Rather will the fact that the party has tried to camouflage its reactionary character by trying to pull Debs down to its level excite the complete disgust of every revolutionary worker. The Socialist Party has betrayed the class ?truggip Tty cannot disguise that betrayal with the name of L -?. imilllMIIIMIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHIIIIIIIIIIHIIIMIIIIMflllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllin I MESSAGE TO DEBS I Editor of "Tho Toiler": j E it lias como to my notice that there is some curiosity about tho j E contents and "official character" of the message sent by Comrade ; E Kuthcnbcrg and myself to Comrade Debs. This message had no official character at all. it was a personal E message, without mandate from any orgnization or committee. No donbt E the fact that Cmradc Euthcnbcrg and I had boon active members of E tho Communist Tarty and of its Central Exocutive Committee might E have indicated to Coinrado Debs that wo expressed a viewpoint which Ei E was shared by many other Communists. El E The telegram was as follows: E E Muj 13, 1920. - "Eugene V. Debs, E E Federal Penitentiary, E E Atlanta, Georgia. E E Earnestly urge you not to accept Socialist nomination until you acquaint yourself with entire work of convention. C. E. RUTHENBERG E I. E. FERGUSON. E "In explanation of the motive of this communication, I need 5 E only state that Bomo of as have felt that the least wo could do under 5 E tho unfortunate set of circumstances which threw us into opposition to 3 E Conimrado Dobs was to inform him as directly as possible of tho fact SS E of that opposition and the reasons compelling it; profcrably, before tho E action which divided us was beyond recall Fraternally yours, -I. E. FERGU80N. E EIGHT WEEKS TO SECURE JURY IN TRIAL OF FORM ER CLP. MEMBERS June 17( 1020. miiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii'iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiiiMiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiMiiiiTi HUNGER STRIKE FORGES FINNS TO RELEASE REED SUPERIOR, WIS. Threatening to go on hunger strike if ho is not roloasod from tho polico prison in Abo, Finland, whoro ho hns been confined for a month. John Reed, Amoricnn .journalist hns frightened tho Finnish secret service into revoking n trumped-up "trenson" charge accusing him of being a Bolshevist courier in order to avoid an internntionnl scandal. These facts hnvo como to light through Fin nish newspapers just recoived hero. It will bo recalled that Reed was ar rested March 13, in tho coal bunker ,,f Hi.' Finnish steamer, Oihennn, on tho charge of smuggling. On April 20, the ellv court f Abo decided that John Reed "had tried to amugglo out of (lie, country 102 diamonds and money."i Tho court imposed a fino of 5,000 marks and tho diamonds wore confisc ated in tho interests of tho govern ment. Vced annealed the ease. While the i te authoritlei were planning their treason coup Reed waited in prison. In order to hasten action ho rctndiatod with a threat of refusing to cat. The affair was forcibly brought to the attention of tho American authorities in Ilclsingfors who havo requested the Finnish authorities to surrender Reod to them. According to the Finnish authorities Reed is to bo deported becnuse ho did not havo any passport. If ho does not leave tho country ho will bo interned in the Hannala prison camp until a further decision is mado. CHICAGO Dospito tho banishing of the Ncarings, Dnnaa, I,cvines and Balchcs from our collegiate institutions so thnt the minds of American students may not bo "polluted" with radical teachings, tho colleges are still turn ing out 400,000 "reds" a year, accord ing to George Whoclcr lllnman of Winnctka, HI., former publisher of the Inter-Ocean and still moro recontly president of Marietta college in Ohio. Prosecution Challenges all Tal esmen with Liberal Ideas, Case Is speeded CHICAGO, June 20. Around New Year's, when the inimitable Attorney General of the United States had de cided to Palmorio tho revolutionary workers' movement in this country, ho asked the co-operation of tho district attorneys of the big centers in accomp lishing this. That put another equally inimitablo gentleman, Mr. Maclay Hoyne, state attorney of Cook County, 111., wise to a schemo to sneak up on Mr. Palmer and to deprimo him of bis laurels. He broke faith with Mr. Palmer, (tho we really suspect thnt the two gents know each other to well to have ever had much faith in each other,1 and pulled off his private raid against the reds one day in advanco of Pal mers schedule. Members of the Com munist Labor Partv, the Communist Party, the I. W. W., tho Union of Russian Workers nnd kindred organi sations were rounded up as tho victims. Polico Chief Garrity's men, who last year so ably assisted tho Socialist Party in purging itself of every sus picion of revolutionary blood, wcro tho fit actora in this patriotic tragic comedy. To justify this wholesale arrest, and to retain tho good will of the Chicago Chamber of Commcrco he had tried so hard to earn during his long, so-called public service, Mr. Hoyne had a special grand jury assembled for tho purpose to return indictments against the "reds." How much the $10,000 slush fund, created by the Chicago Chamber of Commoreo, assisted Mr. Hoyne in this wo do not know, nor do wo care to know ns we are porfectly sure thnt Mr. Hoyne would have dono his duty to hla capitalist masters even without such a little inducement ns $40,000 slush fund. Well, the indictments were duly returned ncalnst 41 members of tho' Communist Labor Party, 35 mem bers of the T. W. W. and against 85 members of tho Communist Party. The first to go on trial wero tho 41 members of tho former Communist Labor Pnrly. If wo say "former" we mean It. Let ns pause here to shed a few tears for the depnrted body of thnt party. Mr. Palmer nnd Mr. Hoyne seem to have suceeded. The 0, L P. ii no more. Its body dis appeared. Rut for all those interested, Including tho nndertnkera Mesrs. Pal mer, Hoyne ct at, It may bo said hero that Ha spirit acema to have survived nnd is re incarnated in tho United Communist Partv. On May 10. before Judge Oscar nebel the cue wu called: the people of tho THE "SPY" STORY Superior Court of Cook County, III, the case wa called: tho people of the stnto of Illinois vs. Wm. Bross Lloyd et al. If the capitalist state had enough decency to throw aside its hypoeriey and cease to speak in the name of the people, tho case would properly be call ed: tho capitalists of Illinois against Communism. Indnctrr.ents were returned against the following alleged members of the Communist Labor Party: Samuel Ash, Max Bedacht, Chas. Baker, Paul Bern ford, Oscar .lease Brown, Jack Carnev, Chas. Clarahan, M. J. Christensen, C. A. Engelkcn, L. E. England, Mayer Dobrovsky, Edwin Firth, Harry A. Greenwood, Samuel F. Hankin Robert Horsley, Helen Judd, L. E. Katterfield, Chas. Katz., Niels Kjar, Chas. Krum briii. J. Kunst, Wm. Bross Lloyd Edward Lindgrcn, Ludwig Lore, James A. Moisinger, John Nelson, Robert Nnrburg, Edgar Owens Margaret Provey, Arthur Proctor, John Reed, Clara Roffsky, Karl F. Sandburg, Juck Schiff, 1'erry Shipman, Alfred Shustor, Morris Stollar, Albert B Stone, Join! Vogel, A. Wagcnknecht and Walter Wolf. Tn court appeared on May 10. the following: Samuel Ash. Max Bedacht, O. J. Brown, Chas. Clarahan, Jack Carney, M. J. Christensen, Meyer Do browsky, C. A. Engolken. L. E. Eng land, Edwin Firth, Samuel F. Hankin, Robert Horsley, L. E. Katterfield, Niels Kjar, Chas. Krumbein, Wm. " Bross Lloyd, L. Lore, Jamos A. Meisinger, John Nelson, Edgar Owens, Arthur Proctor, Morris Stollar, Karl F. Sand berg, Perry Shipman, ' Alfred Shustor and John Vogel. Chas. Clarahan and C. A. Engelkcn were granted a separate trial. Margaret Prcvcy, Helen Judd and Clara Roffsky were not included in tho conspiracy charge on trial, 12 of tho 31 originally indicted havo not been apprehended as yet. Of tho 24 remaining and put to trinl on May 10. four wero released in tho second wook of the trial on motion of tho prosocntion. They wero: Meyer Dobrowsky, Robert Horsley, John Nelson and Alfred Shuster. Mr. Frank Commorford is special prosecutor of tho case by appointment. This gentlemnn once attempted to win fume as a labor lawyer. His ability did not seem to bo quite sufficient for such an aehiovement. So he became a hyper patriotic authority on Bolshevism. Abil ity is not required thcro. Waving the flag and shouting about "our country" do. In thin ho will bo assisted by Mr. Barnhard and Mr. Il.-th, two Assistant State Attorneys. The defense is represented by Mr. Wm. H. Format and Mr. Wm. Cun hea for Wm. Bross Lloyd, and Mr. Clarence Pnrrow for tho rest of the defendants. Ki'.'ht full weeks wero consumod in th selection of a jury. In the course of the examination of tho talesmen it developed thnt the prosecution works npon tho theory that everything that is not expressly sllowed ii forbtdden. Thus any change of government must lie mnrf hv ballnt Thnan trhnan in A lellingence does not allow them to to L- - A- K- Martens and in the (Editorial note: "The Toil er" prints the following state ment in regard to the charges against, Louis (,'. Fraina, for tiie information of its readers, without expressing any opinion as to his guilt or innocence). The New York Call lias found a new way to cover the renctionarv character of the Socialist Party. The organiza tion which it supports has become so thoroughly discredited among the workers of the country that it can no longer expect support by presentation of its principles. Jt has therefore adopted the policy of trying to under mine those organizations which really represent working rlass principles. Recently Attorney-General Palmer mado a statement before the rul"s committee of the Senate, defending his department against the accusation that it had planted spies in tho Communist parties. In this statement ho took up the charge that Louis C. Fraina was an employe of tfcc Department of Justice stating in answer tho facts ia regard to an investigation of tho charges against Fraina, which was mado by representatives of the Soviot Bureau and members of tho Contral Executive Committee of the Communist Party. In answer to this a statement was mado by Santeri Nuorteva, of tho Soviet Bureau. A copy of Nuorteva 's statement was furnished tho "Call" with tho understanding that it would print tho full statement in tho form if a statement and not endeavor to make a news story out of it. In place of keeping tho promise tho "Call" pub lished a garbled account of tho matter, using such portion of tho statement by Nuorteva as sailed its purpose, and followed this up with an editorial try ing to bolster up tho Socialist party, by the iuggestion that tho wholo Com munist movoment was infected by apics and agent provocateurs. Tn nddition to a number of insinuations not bns"d upon facts this editorial contains some outright lies. Since tho investigation mado of the charges against Fraina has been given publicity there is no longer any renson for not stating the facts, which aro as follows: An agent of tho Department of Justieo named Peterson was assigned tho job of spying on the Soviet Bureau. This man endeavored to ingratiate him .self with Santieri Nnortova, secretary course of conversations with him made the statement that Louis 0. Fraina was employed by the Department of Justice. When, early in December Fraina was directed to leave for Europo by the Central Executive Committee of the Communist Party of America to estab lish connections with the Communist International, he requested the Soviot Bureau to give him credentials whii-h would enable him to enter Russia. These credentials wero refused because of the insinuations against Fraina made by the man Peterson. In order to clear up the matter re presentatives of tho Soviet Bureau and members of the Central Executivo Com mittee made an investigation. A meet ing was held at which Fraina was con fronted with tho Department of Justice agent Peterson. At this hearing Peter son stated that he had seon Fraina in the New York offices of the Depart ment of Justice on three occasioas. Two of these dates ho fixed definitely, the other he was unable to fix. Tho two dates so fixed and which ho in sisted upon ns being the correct dates when Fraina was at the Department of Justice in New York, wero Septem ber 7th nnd Novcbmer 15th. Poterson also stated that he had seen in the files of Department of Justice reports supposedly mado by Fraina nnd cancelled checks covering payment to him. These checks ho statod wcro mado; payable to Fraina and were endorsed by him and the ehoekl, after passing through the bank wero filed in the file containing Fraina 's reports. Peterson also gave a description ef the man ho thought was Fraina. When ho was brought into tho room in which the hearing was held ho was asked to state whether he could identify any of the persons present as Fraina, but was unable to do so. (It must be stated here that Fraina 's appearanco had changed somewhat). During the pro gress of the investigation Fraina cross examined Peterson, and after a ques tion or two Peterson stated "You are the man." It must bo said however, that tho description giving by Poterson of tho man he saw in tho Department of Justieo offices wns not a descrip tion by which those who have known Fraina during his work in tho move ment last fall would have recognized him. During the cross examination of Peterson by thoso present many dub ious points as to his motives and as to tho reliability of his story were developed. Whon the cross examination was over Fraina made a statement in reply in which ho brought out that Septem ber 7th was the last day of the Com munist Party Convention and that on that date, as could be verified by a scoro of people he had been in the :W W m TOOT n n n v ;i v -1 v FICNIC AND - B Mass - Meeting THE TRUTH ABOUT INDUSTRIAL UNIONISM U)ld by JOHN SANDGREEN Editor of tho "ONE BIG ONION MONTHLY" at Clio sunt Qrove Park, Cleveland, O. MONDAY, JULY 5th, 1920 Taiko W. 25th Stroot Car thronRh, change at tho cntl of the lino for Kltito U. Cur to Ohostnut Grove Park Tickets 30c. Every Worker Should bo There Under auspices of the I. W. W. rifle Wiifc"ufc ufiiir v