Newspaper Page Text
PAGE SIX Does The Story of \our Mirror Please \ou? IF A OT, CONSULT MRS. WIDENER FOR Singeing, Shampooing, Hair Dressing, Hair Bobbing, Facial, Scalp and Body Massage. Manicuring, Bust Developing, Arm and Hand Massage, removal of Superflous Hair with Electricity, Face Bleaching, Special Black Head Treatment and Electrolytic and Vibrating treatment for Nervousness, Poor Circulation, Nervous indigestion, etc. We can all be just what we really want to be. Every problem has a solution. VISIT THE Widener Comfort Shop TELEPNOrtE 10 8 FOR AN APPOINTMENT •uuauaaauAuuXAauuuuuiuuauuuAAUMMM DR. R. M. WILLIAMSON VETERINERY SURGEON Hospital Accommodations for Horses, Mules and Dogs Dffice and Hospital, Hampton St. near Ball Park. FFXEPHONE 235 An Old Saying: “Cleanliness Is Next To Godliness.” Now is the time to buy Soap. We have the largest and best selected stock of Soaps of all kinds, from the finest toilet article down to the laundry. The stock is fresh, the prices are rignt and quality un surpassed. Let Us Sell You Your Soap Americus Seed & Drug Store LEE ALLEN, Prop, Successor to W. A. Rembeit 1 THE f 6 : Johnston & Murphy Shoe f O g .... For Gentlemen .... 0 o i I Let us fit you in a pair of cool and com- f 1 8 I sortable Palm Beach l ; 8 Oxfords,they fit,wear f o j and satisfy. f ' 5 ► o r V Tillman & Brown I € • Fitters of Feet % C THE AMERICUS DAILY TIMES-RECORDER HOKE SMITH SAYS GREAT BRITAIN WITHOUT WARRANT IN LAW OR JUSTICE IS DESTROY ING SOUTH’S FOREIGN COTTON MARKET Washington, D. C. —United States Senator Hoke Smith has given an in terview, in which he most forcibly as serts that the people of the country, particularly of the South, through their representatives in congress and through their influence in Washington, xnust promptly and vigorously take steps to compel the British govern ment to call off its illegal blockade of neutral European ports, whereby irre parable injury is being done to this country, and particularly to the South, through closing so many important Eu ropean markets to cotton, etc. Sena tor Smith is convinced that we have it in our power to open the seas to our non-contraband commerce by sim ply refusing to supply England and her allies with ammunition until she recedes from her present unwarrant ed and unprecedented position. (By Senator Hoke Smith.) The public mind was justly filled with horror at the sinking of the Lu sitania. But we should not for this reason forget that Great Britain and her Allies have utterly disregarded the rights of American citizens, have placed a heavy burden upon the le gitimate commerce of this country, and have injuriously curtailed cotton markets. Just before the war began middling cotton was selling at 13% cents a pound. We normally sell abroad two thirds of our cotton crop. For a while our entire foreign market was cut off. Our domestic market was serious ly impaired by the disorganized con dition of our finances. Too much praise cannot be given the administration for the manner in which our currency laws were amend ed and threatened liquidation pre vented. Now the reserve banks are in a position where they can issue, if necessary from 3700,000,000 to SBOO,- 000,000 of reserve notes fully secured, and our domestic market for cotton is removed from strain. Last fall exports were hampered by the enormous insurance rates on trans oceanic shipments. The war insurance bureau established in the treasury de partment reduced war insurance rates, which were ranging from 20 to 30 per cent, down to 2 and 3 per cent. Why The Price Os Cotton Went Down To Six Cents Still, during the latter part of Oc tober the price of cotton did not rise. The markets of Germany, Austria and northern Europe consume over 3,000,- 000 bales of cotton annually. This market remained closed. Buyers of cotton thought it would continue clos ed, and the lessened demand, coupled with the threatened surplus, carried cotton down to 6 cents a pound, with a limited market even at that price. Shipments of cotton to Germany, Austria and northern Europe were pre vented by the constantly circulated re pons that Great Britain intended to put cotton on the contraband list, and seize vessels carrying cotton. October 23d the acting secretary of state, at the instance of a committee of senators, conferred with the British ambassador, and urged the British government to give a definite state ment with reference to cotton ship ments. October 26th the British am bassador presented to the state de partment a letter which contained the following language: “'Last night I received a reply from Sir Edward Grey in which he author izes me to give the assurance that cotton will not be seized. He points out that cotton has not been put in any of our lists of contraband. It is, therefore, so far as Great Britain is concerned, in the free list and will remain there." Why Cotton Jumped From Six To Ten Cents The communication of this assur ance from Great Britain made it prac ticable for cotton merchants to se cure vessels and to finance shipments of cotton to Germany, Austria and to northern Europe. This market was thus opened. Cotton buyers realized the broadening market for cotton. During the months of December, Janu ary and February large quantities of cotton were shipped abroad, and the price rose from 6 cents a pound ! to 10 cents a pound. During March mid dling cotton sold up to 10% cents a pound. Thus we have a clear illustration of how the closed market depressed the price, and how the opened and broad ened market increased the price at which cotton sold. What The “Orders In Council" Did To Cotton. On the first of March came the notice from Great Britain that the "British and French governments will hold themselves free to detain and take into port ships carrying goods of presumed enemy destination, own ership, or origin.” This was followed by the order in council of March 12th, but prior to that order the state de partment was informed by the British ambassador that so far a§ cotton was concerned shipments made during the month of March would not be subject to the order in council, but would be covered by a different rule. That rule provided "‘the cotton for which con tracts of sale and freight engagements already had been made before March 2, is to be allowed free transit or bought at contract price If stopped, provided the ship sails not later than March 31st.” During February 1,001,000 bales of cotton were shipped abroad. During March 1,208,500 bales of cotton left our ports. But Great Britain allowed no cotton shipped in March to go free to Holland, Denmark or Sweden. The vessels with cargoes of cotton were seized, and the cotton shipped to Rotterdam, Gothenburg and other European ports was carried into Eng lish ports. Over 200,000 bales of this cotton destined to northern Europe were sold by Great Britain in England during April and May. A Drop From 435,037 Bales To 45,300 Bales In One Month. The table of exportations as kept by the department of commerce classi fies France, Germany, Italy, Russia in Europe, Spain and the United Kingdom, separately. The figures then show for the balance of Europe as “Other Europe." They show that in February we exported to “Other Eu rope” and Germany 435,037 bales of cotton, of this Germany received 88,000 bales. In April we exported to Ger many no cotton and to “Other Europe” only 45,300 bales, thus showing the tremendous shrinkage of exportations of cotton to the neutral ports of north ern Europe, caused by the illegal blockade. But for the blockade, Ger many, Austria and northern Europe would have purchased before August Ist, 1,500,000 additional bales of last year’s crop. A Three-Million-Bale Market Cut Off For This Year’s Crop. Before these seizures by Great Brit ain, the price of cotton was steadily rising. After Great Britain cut off our German, Austrian and northern European market, the price of cotton fell in England a cent and a half a pound. Great Britain stopped the rise and caused the fall in the price of cotton during the past two months. If the present illegal blockade by Great Britain of neutral ports of north ern Europe is permitted to remain of force, not only will we lose the market now for part of last year's crop, but a market will be cut off for 3,000,000 bales of this year’s crop. On March 30th, the state department of our government wrote Great Brit ain protesting against the notice from Great Britain of March Ist, and the order in council of March 12th. This order in council was a declaration of purpose by Great Britain to in tercept all vessels destined to or from the ports of northern Europe carrying goods of presumed enemy destination or origin. That is to say, this order in council of March 12th announced the purpose of Great Britain to close the neutral ports of northern Europe to the commerce of the United States, even though the cargoes consisted of non-contraband goods, when Great Britain suspected that the cargoes might be destined to German or Aus trian use, or that the cargoes were of German or Austrian origin. Cannot Blockade a Neutral Port. There is no rule of international law more fully established than that a belligerent cannot blockade a neutral port, and neutrals have the right to ship to neutral ports non-contraband goods, even though the ultimate desti nation of those goods is to citizens of one of the belligerents. Our government, through the state department, wrote Great Britain on March 30t.h protesting against the no tice of March Ist and the order in council of March 12th. In this letter of March 30th it was declared that “innocent ships may be freely trans ported to and from the United States through neutral countries to belliger ent territory without being subject to British blockade, much less to deten tion and confiscation.” Again this same letter declares that such inter ference by Great Britain is a “dis tinct invasion of the sovereign rights of the nation whose trade and com merce is interfered with.” England's Only Answer Was Continued Seizures. The only answer Great Britain has given to this letter has been the con tinued seizure of vessels loaded with cotton and other non-contraband goods destined to neutral ports. These seiz ures have continued to such an extent that shipments of cotton into this territory have been abandoned. Great Britain has destroyed the market, and has deterred cotton merchants and shippers from even seeking further to enter the market. A cotton shipper was in Washington a few days ago with an order from Sweden for 10,000 bales of cotton. He had proof that the cotton would be consumed by Swedish mills. He sought to obtain assurance from the English embassy here that the vessel would not be seized if he sent the cotton. He obtained no satisfaction. How The South Suffers From This Illegal Blockade. The injury to our entire country, and especially to the cotton-growing states, if the illegal blockade to which I have referred is permitted to remain of force, cannot be over-estimated. Our people struggled through low prices for cotton last fall. They must not submit to continued low prices caused by an illegal blockade. In a number of instances Swedish spinners are now in England seeking through the aid of their government to obtain cotton consigned to them by citizens of the United States which has been seized by Great Britain. By the help of their own government they may obtain some of this cotton. Great Britain has neglected to settle with the cotton shippers for cotton. seized. Various excuses have been given, which can be easily answered. One of these excuses recently em bodied in a letter from Sir Edward Grey is that Swedish consignees are claiming some of the cotton. The ship i pers from the United States ask noth ing better than that cotton should be turned over to their consignees. Great Britain does not deliver to Swedish consignees, or pay the American ship pers. Seized Cotton, But Wouldn’t Pay For It. I had brought to my attention with in the past two weeks the case of a Southern firm which early in March shipped several thousand bales of cot ton to Rotterdam, Holland. A member of the firm came here and presented his invoices together with proof of his contracts of sale to the British em bassy, and sought to obtain payment for the cotton which Great Britain had seized and sold, but he was able to obtain no satisfaction. I will not take up more time discuss ing the mistreatment Great Britain has given to those cotton shippers whose cotton has been carried into English ports. While it is a serious matter for them to have from $5,000,000 to SB,- 000,000, which they should have re ceived for their cotton, tied up by the British seizures, the really big problem is the loss of our market caused by the illegal conduct of Great Britain, and the heplessness of indi viduals to defend themselves. In Spite Os Promises Seizures Continue. The declaration of London made by the representatives of the great na tions of the world, February, 1909, contained a list of those things which under no circumstances in case of war were to be made contraband, and the list was headed by raw cotton. Great Britain has solemnly pledged to this government by the letter of October 26th that cotton would not be seized, and that so far as Great Brit ain was concerned it was on the free list and would remain there. In spite of all this, the seizures have been made and the cotton trade with Ger many, Austria and all of northern Europe destroyed. Other non-contra band commodities have been similarly treated by Great Britain. There Are Other “Rights” Os Citizens That Should Be Stressed Upon The importance of preserving our cotton markets cannot be over-esti mated. It is non-contraband and Great Britain has no right to make it con traband. Great Britain has no right to blockade neutral ports. We should insist upon the rights of citizens of the United States to ship cotton to Holland, Denmark and Sweden, even though it ultimately may go to Ger many and Austria. Not one line has gone from our gov ernment to Great Britain since the let ter of March 30th, which Great Brit ain ignored. It is but fair to the ad ministration to say that I believe the subject would have been aggressively handled before the middle of May but for the sinking of the Lusitania. Should Hold England To Account, No Matter What Germany Has Done. We should not submit longer to the disregard of our rights by Great Brit ain, no matter what Germany has done. The people of the entire coun try should understand what has taken place, and especially those who are being so grievously wronged should see the hand that strikes the blow. But it is said that cotton is used to make explosives. This is nothing new. It w'as the case when the Declaration of London in 1909 declared that raw cotton could not be put upon the con traband list. It was the case last October when we received the solemn pledge from Great Britain that no interference should be made with cot ton shipments. Great Britain cannot now make a new rule that we should recognize on this subject, and she hag not undertaken even to make cotton contraband. It is being stopped by an illegal blockade, a blockade -which dis regards recognized principles of inter national law, and which the Declara tion of London of February, 1909, ex pressly declares shall never be made. Destroying Our Markets, While We Supply Her With Ammunition. Our own government has notified Great Britain that this interference is “a distinct invasion of the sovereign rights of the nation whose trade and commerce is interfered with.” Great Britain and the allies are re ceiving half of their munitions of w-ar from the United States. They would destroy the market for the farmers of the South, and the market for many American producers, while they rely upon the United States to furnish them their implements of war. No Occasion For War, But “Firmness" Is Needed Here, Too. There is no occasion to involve the United States in w-ar with Great Brit ain and the allies, but we should defi nitely notify them that unless our neu tral rights are regarded they canhot continue to receive neutral-privileges from the United States. If Great Britain and the allies were notified that shipments of munitions of war will be discontinued so long as Great Britain prevents shipments by citi zens of the United States, legal at the time the war began, our difficul ties would be quickly solved. Great Britain would withdraw the block ade of neutral ports of northern Eu rope rather than lose her supplies from the United States. I trust that by the time this is read our government may take firm action to compel Great Britain to cease il legally interfering with our cotton markets. But if it has not been done, I ask the support of those interested to help bring pressure upon Great Britain to save the market for our cotton crop. HOKE SMITH. Fricker & Broadhurst JEWELERS & GENERAL REPAIR WORK Special attention given to fine Watch Repairing OFFICES: llOJWest Lamar St. Opposite Post Office NOTICE! ONE-HALF PRICE FOR 10 DAYS The best guaranteed dental work Crowns, Bridges, Plates, Fillings, Etc. Dr. N. S. EVANS, Dentist No Better Equipped Dental Office in The South OVER HOOKS’ PHARMACY WW —1»»M ■■■»»»» ■■■■«—■■■ I tfere s yp If JU" 1 ] the \ 30 _ Weather 'i Don’t Roast Yourself. Madam, be sensible. Cook with a gas range. \ X J IpSiSSiS Perhaps you have been deterred \ 1 ■ from buying one from us because f | | you fear it is too expensive to cook fcn by gas, or because you fear a gas b if oven will not bake well, or because Gas cookihg is cheaper than coal. |p=— Our gas ovens bake splendidly. f7 xr-x Easy payments for you. AMERICUS PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY Hart Schafinei* &.Marx Ccjjrigut Hart bviulfMr it iitu» Think of this store as a trust company; a safe place to ‘invest 9 your clothes money You get more than value received, you ought to on a good investment; you get interest at a high rate. We bind ourselves to see that every thing you buy here gives you good weai, good fit, good looks, goud style, good service, good workman ship. In other words, interest at the rale of 100 per cent in guaran teed satisfaction. Whai you spend here is always on call; draw it out whenever an investment doesn’t satisfy you. W. D. Bailey Co. MONDAY. JUNE 21 ,