Newspaper Page Text
SLIGHT CHANGE IN FOOTBALL RULES With the first football game of the season to be played in Moscow tomor row afternoon at 2:30 it might be well to know something of the slight changes which have been made in the rules of the game for this year. Much dissatisfaction was expressed from time to time last year regard ing the football code. There were certain points which did not appear to work out well. Naturally, the same opposition which had been manifest against the old fash ioned game and the opposition of an other faction which never has been re conclied to the forward pass, would not be silent if the game did not work out to their satisfaction. The provisions for defence, which were incorporated into the rules, it was alleged, were too powerful for any plan of attack which might be formed. The game had been worked too far into a negative problem. Two teams might play, and one team, perhaps, be superior to the other in everything except ability to make drop kicks. The former team would lose all ad vantage which it might gain by the ability of the weaker team to lift goals every now and then from the field. Furthermore, two teams which were well matched to piay might never bring the game to a conclusion, since neither team might be able to score, despite the fact that one of the two, on general form, might appear to be better than the other. V, Changes Were Few. In spite of all this, the changes in the rules were very few and quite con servative. After much discussion it was agreed that perhaps it would be better to give latitude to the rules in general to run for another year, trust ing that players throughout the coun try would be better accustomed to them, and that the coaches might work out even more variety than they had in the past. It was affirmed that annual rule changes never would bring the game to anything, although it was suggested, with perhaps equally sound reasoning, that while the game was in the process of being changed the changes might as well continue until some satisfactory basis had been agreed upon. The ques tion arose as to when satisfaction was likely to be general. The rules have practically been re written this year. This is something which every player should note. They are simpler, more direct, and clearer in language than they ever have been. The benefit of this will apply large ly to the teams of young players, where one of the hardest tasks which has confronted them has been to un derstand what the rules mean. Paren thetically, it may be added that there ly or be is have been some older players who were not without their troubles in the same direction. The principal changes in the rules are in reference to our old friend, the forward pass, which has been in the centre of football agitation for the last three years. The first change which was made was in the rule regarding the penalty for an incompleted, or anlllegal, for ward pass. The incompleted pass is that which hits the ground before be ing touched by a player of either side. The illegal pass is that which Is made within less than five yards back of the line of scrimmage, or one which is first touched by a player of the side in possession of the ball who is not eligible to touch the ball. As It was Last Year. a Last year penalties for faults of this the character were measured from spot on the playing field from where the ball had ba$n passed, and the ball was returned to that point. The of ficial who was in charge of the for ward pass always had to mark the spot from which the ball had been started in order that the penalty might be enforced from the proper spot if the pass were not allowable. This year the new rule provides that the ball must be returned to the spot from where it was originally put into play after an Illegal or Incompleted This will make It much easier pass. for the officials and probably do away with some wrangling on the field. All in all, It seems to be much more sat isfactory than the first method of enforcing the penalty. It is not like ly to curb the use of the pass, and if the play is poorly performed all that the teams will be asked to do will be to go back to the line of scrimmage which they have Just left. When the forward pass was first put Into the game, and when the rule makers began to perceive,that it was useful that It could often take the place of a punt, they figured that the man who was to receive the forward pass was entitled to even more pro tection than the player who caught a punt—for that reason no one could ever tell, unless it was to try to In sure the success of the forward pass. Last year's rule and this year's rule so provide that the pass may be made over any point of the scrimmage line. All that the player who throws the ball must do is to fall back the sary five yards behind the scrimmage line. neces Protection for Players. In the code of 1910 the players the attacking side, following the for ward pass, were protected by the rule prohibiting interference with the man w ^° was to catch the ball within the twenty-yard zone, in which the pass was legal- The player who caught the ball within the required limit could not be tackled unless he had ta ken at least one step forward after making the catch. on That rule kept everybody in hot wa ter all of the year. It was next to impossible for a man to catch a for ward pass without making a step and frequently he would claim that he had not stepped purposely, but was merely trying to retain his balance. The rule has been changed so that this year when a player catches a forward pass he may be tackled and stopped as one is tackled when catch ing a punt. The sections of the code which gov ern this play are ag follows: "Any player of the side that did not make the forward pass has full right to touch and to attempt to secure pos session of the ball. "When the ball has been legally passed forward and has been legally touched before striking the ground by any player of the side not making the pass, any player of either side has the right to attempt to secure posses sion of the ball." That simplifies matters a great deal. There will be an end to discussion and qarreling this year. A forward pass is to be handled and to be looked after as if it were a punt, and if it is a play of the game that is as good for foot ball as some football solons seem to believe there is no reason why it should be privileged against other plays. Very Important In connection with this rule, how ever, attention must be called to the fact that a forward pass which strikes the ground whether a player has touched it or not, is dead at once. Note carefully the wording of this section; "If the ball, after having been legal passed forward, strikes the ground within the field of play, either before after having been touched by a player of either side, the pass shall not considered as completed." This rule plainly defines that there no necessity for all or any of the players to jump into a free-for-all dead the moment that it hits the turf. That looks like legislation for the young and growing football players. It is safe to say that it will do away with a great deal of the minor injury which falls to the younger generation of players, for unquestionably one of the principal pleasures of a small boy's life is to mix in a "pile up" on a foot ball field whenever opportunity offers for one. The rule in reference to the players of the attacking side who may re ceive the forward pass has not been changed. It reads as follows; "After the ball has been legally pass ed forward it may first be touched only by such players of the passer's side as were at the time the ball was put in play at least one yard behind the line of scrimmage or were playing at either end of the said line." If any players of the side making the forward pass who is ineligible to receive the pass, touches the ball it is an illegal pass and the ball is dead. The time which elapses for the in termissions between the first and sec ond periods and the third and fourth has been cut down to two minutes. The players, instead of standing around in the chill huddled in their blankets, will have about time to trot from one side of the field to the other and take up their new positions. Only three men, instead of five, may walk along the side lines during the game. The linesman may be called upon to judge the question of offside play instead of the umpire. The umpire also becomes the official timekeeper instead of the field Judge. When the runner is tackled after the referee's whistle has announced that the ball is dead the offending team will have to stand a penalty, and that is very good ruling, for it is sad to say that there have been players who seemed to delight in roughing it when there was no occasion for them to do If the ball touches an official it does become dead as in past years, but play continues as if the official had not been in the way. It is argued that this will be of as much advan tage or disadvantage to one team as another in the general run of the game. m • •: % - I ■'W >■ A • - ■ V:.,' » - 'V. ■ K J W s : wm I .. . . >; ' M . 'H - : ■ .-a ■ mm ■■■ £i .y./V--,'-': 4 ' -< m • J; , •; ,■ "I DID RIGHT" SAYS TEDDY. Former 5.—Theodore NEW YORK, Oct. Roosevelt has an article on "How United States Acquired the Right Dig the Panama Canal" in the current number of the Outlook, Mr. Roose velt discusses statements which have been made from time to time that acted in an unconstitutional manner and usurped authority in connection with the Panama project and he holds the regularity of the proceed ings throughout. Mr. Roosevelt says that his messages congress set forth in full and detail every essential fact connected with the various phases of the acqui sition of the Panama canal. He adds: "The simple fact was that when the interest of the American people im peratively demanded that a certain act COUNTY MUST INCREASE THE SCHOOL TAX LEVY erroneous, coming from Boise. A dis COEUR D'ALENE, Oct. 4.—Judge Flynn in the case of Independent School district No. 1 vs. the board county commissioners, an appeal from the action of the board in fixing the school tax levy at 2.46 mills, has handed down a decision holding that the commissioners acted without auth ority of law and that the provision of the state law which provides for levy of not less than 5 mills for edu cational purposes, is mandatory. Judge Flynn's ruling is the same as a ruling by Judge Davis of Ada county in a similar action. The question will in all probability be car ried to the supreme court for final determination. The ruling will, if permitted to stand, result in the creation of an ad ditional fund of approximately $30, 000, available for Coeur d'Alene schools this year. The article appearing in Tuesday's Daily Star-Mirror regarding the case in Kootenai county relative to school tax levy for the independent school district of Coeur d'Alene, was patch from Coeur d'Alene says that the commissioners have been ordered to raise the levy as prescribed by law: Alias Summons. n the District Court, Second Judicial District of the State of Idaho, in and f ir the County of Latah Dora Krewson, Plaintiff. vs. Stephen Krewson, Defendant. To Stephen Krewson. Defendant. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO SEND GREETING: You are hereby notified thaï there now on file in the office of the Clerk the District Court of the Second Judicial District of the State of Ida President his course in constructing should be done and I had the power to do it, I did it unless it was specif ically prohibited by law, instead of timidly refusing to do it unless I could find some provision of law which ren dered it imperative that I should do it. "Worked the People. " the to he failure to exercise them. "In other words, I gave the benefit of the doubt to the people of the Uni ted States and not to any group of bandits, foreign or domestic, whose in terests happened to be adverse to those of the people of the United States. "In my judgment history had taught the lesson that the présidant has very great powers if he chooses to exercise those powers; but if he is a timid or selfish man, afraid of responsibility and afraid of risks he can, of course, manufacture ingenuious excuses for Court's Order. Judge Flynn's order follows: "It is by the court ordered that the motion of G. O. Dart, appellant herein, for judgment on the pleading in this action be, and the same here by is sustained, for the reason that said section 65 of chapter 159 of the laws of the state of Idaho, passed by the legislature of the state of Idaho in 1911, is mandatory, and that the I board of county commissioners is | without authority to levy a tax in any other amount than not less than five, nor more than ten mills, on each dol lar of taxable property in their re spective counties, and it is therefore ordered that judgment be rendered herein, and judgment hereby is rend ered in favor of the appellant and against the board of county commis sioners of Kootenai county, Idaho, holding that the order appealed from, in so far as it 'attempts to levy a tax for school purposes at 2.45 mills, is without jurisdiction and void, and said order in that regard is reversed and this action remanded to the board of county commissioners with direction to proceed to levy for school pur poses as required by law, and the order of this court, and that appellant have and recover his costs and dis bursements herein expended." ho, in and for the County of Latah, at Moscow, Idaho, the complaint of the above named plaintiff in an action brought against you, of the nature in general terms as follows: vorce on the ground of desertion al leging that on or about the 15th day of October, 1905, in Latah County, Ida ho, you deserted and abandoned the plaintiff and ever since said last nam ed date have continued to desert and abandon her and to live separate and apart from her without any sufficient 1 cause or reason and against her will For di Panama canal. "In October and November, 1903, events occurred on the Isthmus of Pan and which ama which enabled me, made it my highest duty to the peo ple of the United States, to carry out the provisions of the law of congress. I did carry them out and the canal s" is now being built because of what thus did. I "The interests of the American peo ple demanded that I should act just exactly as I did act; and I would have taken the action I actually did take even though it had been certain that to do so meant my prompt retirement from public life at the next election; for the only thing which makes it m., worth while to hold a big office is ta king advantage of the opportunities tlie office offers to do some big thing that ought to be done and is worth doing." l. and without her consent. I You are hereby directed to appear and answer to said complaint within twenty days after the service hereof, if served within this district, and with in forty days if served elsewhere (ex clusive of the day of service.) And unless you so appear and answer, the plaintiff will appeal to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Given under my hand and the seal of the District Court of the Second Judicial District of the State of Ida ho in and for the County of Latah, this 5th day of September, A. D. 1911. (SEAL) HOMER E. ESTES, Clerk. By ADRIAN NELSON, Deputy. in of MORGAN & MORGAN, Residence Moscow, Idaho, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Sep7-Octl2 is of Notice of Sheriff's Sale of Real Estate Under Execution. N. Williamson, Plaintiff. vs. Gideon W. Cole, Defendant. By virtue of an execution, issued out of the Justice Court of East Mos cow Precinct, in and for the County of Latah, wherein N. Williamson, plain tiff, and Gideon W. Cole, defendant, up on a judgment rendered the 25th day of September, 1911, for the sum of one hundred twenty-nine and 25-100 ($129.25) dollars in gold coin, besides interest and costs. I have this day levied upon all right, title claim and interest of said defendant, Gideon W. Cole of, in and to, the following de cribed real estate, to-wit: The Northwest quarter (NWy 4 ) of Northwest quarter (NW%) of Section Twenty-five (25) in Township Forty (40) North Range Five (6) W. B. M. in Latah County, State of Idaho. Public Notice is Hereby Given, That will on Saturday, the 21st day of October, A. D. 1911, at 2 o'clock P. M., of that day, in front of the Court House door at Moscow, Idaho, sell at public auction, for United States gold coin, all the right, title, claim and in terest of said defendant, Gideon W. Cole of, in and to the above described property or so much thereof as may be necessary to raise sufficient amount satisfy said judgment, with interest and cost, etc., to the highest and best bidders. Dated this 26th day of September, 1911. in. and in of, the of in 6th Sept28-Octl9 C. C. BROWN, Sheriff of Latah County, Idaho. By FRANK A. ROBINSON, Deputy. son I For school books and supplies I Sherfey's Book Store. see 17tf LODGE DIBECTOBY A. F. & A M„ PARADISE LODGE, NO 17 meets 3d Saturday of each month. ~ ' Jenkins, \V. M.; J. A. Keener, Secy. Francis I- o. O. F„ NO. 31, MEETS EVERY nesday evening in 1. O. O. F. hall Peterson, N. G.; Geo. R. WED Chas. Knowles, Secy. STAR REBECCA LODGE, NO. 15. MEETS G. Mr« 4 Tk iuesd n y ' , Mrs - Jas - Canham, N. a»., Airs. i nos. Dowdy, Secy* M. VV. OF A., PARADISE CAMP NO 5653 T e £ S S* and 4th Thursday. L. Pei er son' clerk, Robert Odenburg, council. * K , 0 £ P a N p- 1, MEETS EVERY MONDAY kör K an Ä c - C; s - K - H - McG ° wa ": P and II 4th w a TE a S ' N 9' 24 ' MEET 2D and 4tli Wednesdays of each month, Hodgms' hall. Mrs. C. E. Merwin, AL E. c., Mrs. \ina D. Moore, K. of R. at B V P ; °; K„ NO. 249, MEETS 2D AND 4TH Saturdays. D. W. Staley, Ex. Ruler; D. 1. A. Mackintosh, Secy. brotherhood meets at I. Ü, O days. \V. Secy. OF A. Y., NO. 860, iv 2d a,ld 4th Mon A. 4umliof, H. F, ; s. p_ ;i a || W. o. THE W., NO. Tuesday in each month, t . ; H. R. Smith, clerk. 228. MEETS 4TH C. J. Orland, C. O. A. R. MAJOR ANDERSON POST NO 5 meets 3d Saturday in each month. VV ' k' Jameson, Com.; VV. H. Beardsley, Secy o. E. S., RUBY CHAPTER, NO. every 3d Tuesday. M Mrs. Alatti 9, MEETS i. Edna Pickett, VV. Headington, Secy. \l l<- OF C, NO. 1339, MEETS 1ST AND Driscoll, Secy .* 8 J ' Keane ' K ' «arry .11) UNITED ARTISANS, COLUMBIAN AS " lcel î; sv . ry lst and 3d pr ' ^ tva A - M. A.; Chas. Peterson, R. N. A., MEETS 1ST AND 3D THURSDAY son n 1 ?./' V-„°\.''c lla11 ' Anna Richard auu, U racle; E lla M. Stewart, Recorder. ,V 5.t. KELI£ T c °R ps . meets the " ) n -, oaiUr ?. ay a ! 1 f rnüu,li each month at o.jU o clock. Mae \\ hitcher. Pres.; Hen rietta Herman, Secy. ( Ill UCII DIRECTORY First M. E. Chureh. Corner 3d and Adams ry Sunday at 11 a. Services eve Sunday Epworth i rayer meeting, • Strangers espec arner, Pastor. streets. . and 8 p. every Sunday at 10 a. League Sunday at 7 Thursday evening at 8 p lally invited. Robert VV m. sell m. p. ni. First Presbyterian Church. ..£ orner 4th and Van Buren streets. Serv ices every Sunday at II a. m. and 8 p. m. Sunday selmol a , i 0 a. m„ Christian Endeavor 7 p. in. Prayer meeting followed by Teach ers meeting, Thursday a? 7:30 p. m David 123 liare ' Pastor > 413 Van Buren street; Phone First Baptist Church. C ^ rn ^ lst .? nd J ackson Streets. Bible school, a. m. Morning worship, 11:15. Junior , 3 p. m„ B. Y. P. U, devotional sèrv e, o;.iu p. m.; evening worship st 7:30. Mid _eek prayer service, Thursday at 7:30 p. m. hilt pa v ur an ,', People invite you to worship 'ü \ OU u W, i> k?, eordlall y welcomed. David re ". Pl'ione 3'5. aSt0r ' Kesidence 21 ° E - 1st Uni Christian Church. Corner Jefferson and 5th every Sunday at II a. m. and 8 p. school at 10 a. ~ ■ - Prayer Black, Services m., Christian Endeavor at*'?^ ycr meeting Thursday at 8 p. m E R Pastor. streets. St Mark's Episcopal Church. Corner 1st and Jefferson streets. Services on Sunday, 10 a. m„ Sunday school; 11 a Morning prayer and sermon. t .w 11 seats fr ee. m.. No evening Strangers welcome. sermon. German M. E. Church. Corner Spotswood and Harrison streets Services every Sunday at 11 a. m. Sunday school at 10 a. m. Pastor's residence. 423 Spotswood street. Phone 1480. P I Seh. nert. Pastor. Church of Christ, Scientist Corner Jackson and 3d streets. Sunday serv invited 11 m " Sunday 12 m - AU arc cordially Allas Summons. the District Court, Second Judicial District of the State of Idaho, in and for the County of Latah. G. C. Pankey, Plaintiff. vs. Ella Pankey, Defendant. To Ella Pankey, defendant. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO SEND GREETING; You are hereby notified that there on file in the office of the Clerk the District Court of the Second Ju dicial District of the State of Idaho, and for the County of Latah, at Mos cow, Idaho, the complaint of the above named plaintiff in an action brought against you, of the nature in general terms as follows: Plaintiff alleges that on the 21st day December, 1909, at Harrisburg, Illinois he and defendant herein in termarried and ever since that date have been and now are husband and wife; that on or about September 2, 1910, defendant disregarding her mar riage vows deserted and abandoned plaintiff and still continues to so de and abandon plaintiff herein; WHREFORE plaintiff prays for a de of divorce from defendant here now You are hereby directed to appear answer to said complaint with twenty days after the service here if served within this district, and within forty days if served elsewhere (exclusive of the day of service.) And unless you so appear and answer, the plaintiff will appeal to the Court for relief demanded in the complaint. Given under my hand and the seal the District Court of the Second Ju District of the State of Idaho, and for the County of Latah, this day of September, A. D. 1911 (SEAL) HOMER E. ESTES, Clerk. By ADRIAN NELSON, Deputy. MORGAN & MORGAN. Residence Moscow, Idaho, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Sep7-Octl2 Safe deposit boxes for rent. Thomp Bros. X