Search America's historic newspaper pages from 1756-1963 or use the U.S. Newspaper Directory to find information about American newspapers published between 1690-present. Chronicling America is sponsored jointly by the National Endowment for the Humanities external link and the Library of Congress. Learn more
Image provided by: University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Newspaper Page Text
Western Maryland Edition. A Response The Lutheran • ‘ A -v W v ■ ,j*i o -y Official Organ of the United Lutheran Church in America 1228-1231 Spruce Street Philadelphia, Pa. Nathan R. Melhorn, D.D., Litt.D., LL.D., Editor Mr. Robert T. Kerim, 12 South Mechanic Street, Cumberland, Maryland. Dear Mr. Kerlin: Your postcard of July 27 reached The Lutheran and copies of the journal to which you referred, “The Voice of have also been received and their con tents noted superficially. You will he interested to know that more news original ing in labor unions and from labor leaders have been coming to the church press in recent months. 1 think that we who are in editorial positions are impressed with the efforts of labor to obtain the larger share in the products of their industrv. In most instances, however, we are not sufficiently near to the actual situa tions to he able to deal with them adequately. Under such circumstances we pre fer to print news and avoid partisanship in discussion. Very truly yours, Nathan R. Melhorn. There are several points in and about this letter to which this Editor wishes to direct attention. The postcard and copies of the Voice of Labor referred to were sent to the chief denominational paprs of about a dozen churches at the date mentioned—July 27. 1. This letter is the only acknowledgement. 2. This letter admits that after four months only superficial attention has been given to the Voice of Labor. 3. Labor unions are sending their literature to church papers in increasing abundance, proviug labor's desire to instuct the churches on labor affairs. 4. Church papers will not champion the cause of labor because the editors are not sufficiently informed. 5. More than this can he read between the lines and discerned in the cordial but cautious tone of this letter. Draw your own conclusions. Incidentally, note the editors array of titles. And yet, and yet, and yet! Too remote from the labor movement to sav anvthing about it! Robert T. Kerlin. The Why Labor is militant. It is well for all people to know this. It is militant, and will continue to be militant. It is well for all people to know why. The explanation of the fact is in history; the ex* planation of the reason is in the contemporary conflict of economic classes. To begin to understand the mood of Labor the general public must read the history of Labor’s long heroic blood-stained strug gle to achieve its present legal rights and power In our economy. Read In that history of the laws that Labor had to get annulled. Read of the employers’ practices—incredibly inhumane —that had to be exposed to deaf ears and unseeing eyes, and abolished after many years of attack Read of the social forces Labor had to oppose—and that, too, without the weapons those forces had at command—the social classes that exploited the workers, lived and flourished and en joyed themselves in parasitic idleness, fattening on the profits from the excessive, underpaid toil of virtual slaves; social classes that made and executed the laws, that created public opinion, that wielded inherited power and took advantage of traditional privilege. Read that history, from the beginning of modern history down to the present hour —down to the strike publicized in the headlines of this morning’s daily and described as “labor trouble’’ —read that history and you will begin to understand why Labor is militant. Two centuries of bitter struggle for decency in working con ditions, for an income in wages that would enable workers to do a little more than survive to work, and for a recognition of themselves as human beings, not machines and not chatties, have made the workers to be soldiers in an unending warfare for what all men most prize. (Ask yourself what these things are). Yes, for the reasons that make workers human beings Labor is militant. All thinking people today are deeply concerned about the peace which should follow this frightful (and inexcusable) war. Rightly so. They want a peace founded upon justice; a peace assuring freedom, and decency, and fairness for all nations and all groups of people; a peace that will last because it is worthy to last. Millions of people want and demand such a peace for the nations of the world —all the nations. And no worthier aspiration and effort has ever appeared in mankind. *• Commendable as this aspiration and this effort is. there is another war on, a war that has been on for generations, and which has. too, its bloody story, about which people have given and are giving altogether too little thought. It is the war too abstractly and euphemistically called “the conflict between Labor and Capital.” It is, too. a costly war, tremendously costly; costly in material goods, costly in spiritual goods, costly in blood. Since the general public is so profoundly indifferent to the human issues in this war; since the general public, if it takes sides at all in the conflict, goes with Capital, the battles must be fought out in the main by the workers themselves, unaided and alone. That is why Labor is militant. It is not ancient —this history. Comfort not yourselves, good friends, with this flattering delusion. It is as contem porary as the New Deal; as the NLRB; as this global war; as Weir, Pew, Girdler, Congressman Smith; as the Readers Digest. It is because Capital in this conflict has all the advan* tages of tradition, of “respectability,” of the facilities for creat ing public opinion, on its side, and because Capital is alert, ingenious, and active In mustering its forces to subdue Labor, that Labor is militant. The securing of a just and durable peace in this Labor- Capital war, a peace founded on humane principles, on justice and social prudence, might well receive a share of the general public’! thought. Meanwhile, Labor is militant. The CIO NEWS Hntered hk Second Cl us* Mattel, Post OITIce. Washington. D. C.. Under the Art of Aug. 24. 1912. and Feb. 28. 1923. Postmaster: Send Form 3578-P Cards to Western Maryland CIO News. Box 299. Cumberland. Md. Vol. 7. No. 49 December 4, 1944 Religion and Labor The CIO has actively undertaken to interest the churches —Protestant, Catholic, Jewish—in the tvorking class. Early in October it participated in a three-day session of the First International Religion-Labor Conference at Pittsburgh, at which all these churches and the CTO were represented. The situation and its problems were discussed with the purpose of bringing the workers into churches that would give them actual help in their lives and of bringing a practical religion into shops nnd factories. The program of this conference indicates that there was much more than this in its discussions. Practical and timely economic topics, covering a wide range, were discussed by men of understanding. The nation was hearing over the radio at that time oratorical stuff of infinitely less importance. This confer ence received little public attention. The CIO followed this face-to-face discussion by a pamphlet titled “Religion and Labor.” Every citizen of good will should read this pamphlet and think on its contents. (Price 5 cents, order of the Voice of Labor.) Organized labor and the churches have too many inter ests in common, too many com mon objectives, for them to stand aloof from each other. Movie Managers Join CIO San Francisco, Dec. 2—The men who have to listen systematically to complaints from irate movie pa trons have formed their own union. The first union organization of theater managers and assistants, is known as the Motion Picture Managers Guild, afliliated with the United Office & Professional Work ers <ClO>. The local includes managers and assistants in the Golden State Theater & Realty Corp. and San Francisco Theaters Inc. and claims a majority of employes in both chains. “The rest of the theater industry is organized.” UOPWA Regl. Dir. William Piehl commented, “and it is high time for the managers and assistants to enjoy the benefits of organization. . . . They too are in terested in postwar security, salary Increases and improvement in work ing conditions.” •