Search America's historic newspaper pages from 1770-1963 or use the U.S. Newspaper Directory to find information about American newspapers published between 1690-present. Chronicling America is sponsored jointly by the National Endowment for the Humanities external link and the Library of Congress. Learn more
Image provided by: State Historical Society of North Dakota
Newspaper Page Text
'MC V* JU^ v* ,*-1 This is what has happened thus "far in the fight of the mortgage bankers against the government institutions: Suit Was filed attacking the constitutionality of the farm loan banks and also attacking the provi sion by which their bonds are exempted from taxa tion. After a hearing before the United States cir cuit court of appeals at Kansas City this suit was appealed to the supreme court: of the United States. The result of this suit was that instead of being able to sell federal farm loan bonds at 4% per cent, the land banks were compelled to issue 5 per cent bonds and charge the farmers 5% per cent interest on loans. The suit before the United States su •preme court cast a shadow upon the legality of the bonds and made them difficult to sell, just as the suit against the Bank of North Dakota made it difficult to sell its bonds. On May 12 the supreme court of the United States, after considering the case for some mpnths, announced that a rehearing would be held, and set the case for reargument for October 11,1920. This meant not only that a final decision would be postponed several months more but in dicated, in the belief of many people, that the supreme court was evenly divided upon the question. The supreme court consists of nine justices, but Justice Brandeis is disqualified in this case, haying been inter ested in upholding the farm loan bank sys tem before he was appointed to the bench. The result of the case being set for re largument was virtually to prevent -the farm loan banks from operating during the period that must elapse before the case can be settled finally. Thousands of applies-^ tions for farm loans were before the farm loan banks all_ over the United States. There was no money available to make these loans because bonds could not be sold. As a result the farmers had to turn to the mortgage bankers getting loans atj" 7 or 8 per cent or higher, instead of at 5 or 5% per cent, and often paying a 2 per cent "bon-to" besides. CONGRESS DEFEATS BEST BELIEF PLAN I' frThe Appeal- then was taken to congress to use government money to purchase these,. bonds white the suit was pending. Two propositions were put before congress. One was to appropriate sufficient money to buy bonds sufficient to make all loaiis that might be approved by the farm loan "banks' up to March 1, 1921, by which time a deci sion might be expected by the supreme court of the United States. The other proposition was to appropriate only enough money to meet farm loans, approved before March 1, 1920. This would provide no money for farm loans approved from*. March 1, 1920, until the decision of the supreme court is handed down, perhaps a year from flow. The question came up first in the house of representatives. As might have been expected the bill granting only the smaller amount of relief was passed. The proposal to authorize the secretary of 'the .treasury to buy farm loan bonds to cover loans made up to next March'was defeated by a vote jfbf 148 to 121. The same question came up in the senate senate took the same ground as the house, passing the bill providing for mmm 1 rust "rights. HE conSpiraey 'of iJiV banHnV'totWekts purchasing of bonds "cbvering farm loans' approved to destroy the federal land banks and prior to March. 1, 1920. release the loan companies from com- :V .The second proposal, to allow the purchase of petition with the low interest rates of. ''tfimds to cover loans up until March 1, 1921, then the federal institutions already has re sulted in the bankers raising interest rates from 1 to 3 per cent throughout the North west, and in many instances the bankers now are demanding a cash bonus of froga 2 per cent upward, according to E. G. Quamme, director of the St. PauL Federal Land bank. §fc? "We will have to turn down about 10,000 farmer^" during the next few months as a result of these at tacks," Mr. Quamme announced. p,vi"The J**®** PLANT .MORE Hoover Sfrts wg MUST IMPORT FOOD VUTHIN THREE YeAfifS EuR0P£ ST (U Mortgage Bankers Claim to Be Able to Influence Supreme Court of the United States—Block Farm Bank Loans was brought up, SfThis is what happened, taken from the Congres^f -'. sional Record of May 19, page 7887 "Senator Gronna—1 move that, the joint resolu.-' tion (S. J. Res. 196)-extending the provisions of an act amending section 32 of the federal farm loan act, approved July 17i 1916, to June 30, 1921, be indefinitely postponed, motion was agreed t6." ^CSSoby motion :of Senator Gronna of North Dakota, who has posed as a friend of the farmers, tens of thousands of farmers throughout the United States,~ whose applications for loans haye been approved by federal farm loan banks since March 1, 1920, must be turned down. Gronna, it may be noted, is the candidate of thfe anti-League politicians of North Dakota for re election. The farmers are ^backing Doctor E. F. Ladd, president of the North Dakota, Agricultural -college, a proved friend of "the farmers of .the last quarter-century. Are the mortgage bankers of America stronger than the common people, able to influence congress, able even to influence the supreme court of the United States The Leader does not say so, but they say so them selves. Following is a circular letter written by W. M. Heckler of the Wells-Dickey company, Minneapolis, chairman of the membership committee of the Farm Mortgage Backers' association of Americano HIS HANDS TIED ^f^r-jPS m, if vy SPISf^P -Drawn expressly for the Leader by W. C. Morris. The government advises the farmer to grow more crops. Yet within the last few months the government has refused to'come to the relief of drouth-stricken farmers of the Dakotas to change the unfair wheat, grades in the interests^ of the farmers has allowed market gamblers to resume theiiv manipulations of wheat prices, resulting in a drop in the price of wheat immediately upon the ending of government control and finally has refused to help any ap-: plicants for farm loans this year, leaving farmers who must have money at the mercy of the mortgage bankers. The farmer gets advice from the governtfent but heljJ is what he needs. and'Montana has refused mortgage bankers not yet members of the asso- ciation: "Gentlemen: We inclose herein special bulletin No. 66, issued bjf the Farm Mortgage Bankers' as sociation of America. ThisTs the only one. of a series of bulletins which are issued from time to 'kr time, sometimes three or four times a month, to the members of the association, and shown, the way the wind is blowing each time. COSTS $25 TO JOIN THIS BROKERS' "LEAGUE'" "You will note the remarks in regard to the su preme court in the matter of passing on the con stitutionality of the tax exemption feature of the land bank bonds. Most of us believe that the su preme court did not care to render their decision, which I interpret to.be unfavorable to the land banks but favorable to us, until after the next elec tion. At any rate, the Farm Mortgage Bankers* association, I think, is directly'responsible for the federal land banks and joint stock land banks not being in operation today and not being able to dper-^t ate until some time next year. "lam wondering.if this fact alone is not "wortii considerable more to you than the small lee fox which we charge for membership in the association,, and, as a matter of fact, dont you think that the. association is entitled to support, both financial and moral, in their work for the betterment of fajtn mortgage dealers? If you agree with us^-will you kindly fill out the enclosed application and send it td me with your check for $25 which will pay ^our fee until September 1 The check should be made payable to N. D. Chassell, Secretary and treasurer,* but send it to me. '^Respectfully yours, "W. M. HECKLER, '-'Chairman Membership Committee." "COUNTRY GENT" LOSES Since the "Country Gentleman" has been league it has its circulation consequence the 7|| so-called "farm paper" has gotten out a circuliir letter which is being mailed to all farmers who fail to renew their subscrip ||§pJtiori» -asking why the former subs«iribers re displeased with it. This is ai sample of the replies that the I "Country Gentleman", is getting from-" League members: J^^S^j^Editor. Country Gentleman: I have your letter in^iyhich yojj want me to renew my subscription. Never again will I give a dollar to any paper or magazine which is not either friendly or neutral toward- the Nonpartisan league. Let me ask you what has the League done to the Country Gentleman, that its columns should be filled with such bunk as has been printed. I pay my $18 regularly and get my money's worth lis jwSff" tening# to the other papers knock. We farmers who think and do things refuse to. stand tied any more. "Come out here and stay a week help me take ciare of the lambs and colts help me to get in this crop under the most damnable conditions that a farmer" ever had to work under. Then be here when I sell this fall and you will see why we stay with the League. E. SPRIGG. v"Emory, Mont." CITY MANAGER PLAN^ JOne hundred and eighty cities in ihe United States now have adopted the city manager plan of government. Dubuque, Iowa, is one of the latest. Dubuque has employed as city manager Ossian A. 'Carr, who previously had managed Cadillac, Mich., Niagara Falls, N. Y., and Spring field, Ohio.. The city manager plan allows a city to employ the most competent man for manager, regardless of whether he is a resident of the city or not. Iff my- 9. & A 1 f®. »r:~ -i- it- m: MM" ir+s &