Newspaper Page Text
* IV. \ vqlrlxx™o.^est1_CHICAGO AND CINCINNATI, SATURDAY, OCTOBKK 30, 1897. {THEv^txSa^NTl NO. 44 The "siffliversalist t RELIGIOUS AND FAMILY WEEKLY ^iversalist Publishing House, pubi.ishkus. a. F. ENDICOTT, General Agent Issued Every Saturday by the • tsTERN Branch ofthe Publishing Ilousi .Dearborn St. Rooms 40 and 41 CHICAGO. IL.C. - ( $2.60 A VEAR IN ADVANCE ' S,W!S ’ • *} 1.26 SIX MONTHS. POSTAGE PAID. SAMPLE tOPIES ALWAYS FREE. iiK.iim iM t.v- Ihiko all . itccKs droits, • •iiey and express orders payable to A. M. ohnson. Cashier, or Universalist rnbllMiinji ,‘ise. Western liraneh •"ntpr*** nt the ProatofMor- ** M«ti M~*‘- - Convention Uddresses. ADDDRESS TO THE CLERGY. BY H. N. HIGINBOTHAM, Wednesday Evening, Oct. 20. A humorous friend of mine once told me that he liked being an Episcopalian because it gave him an opportunity to talk back. A greet many people within and without ths churches, and within and without social organizations, often feel themselves called upon to express their views upon some particular topic; but they are ever held in the leash of circumstances that seem eternally to hedge them about. A great many times in my life I have felt that perhaps 1 had pent within my consciousness some intellectual force that might be of bene fit to mankind, and I have—but far lees frequently—entertained at times rather strong views on church matters. It never occurred to me that I would be called upon to express them; I never considered in my mind what I should say if I were called upon, and I freely confess that now I am facing the ac cepted duty of addressing myself to the clergy, and I do not mind saying that I am very nervous about it, and question whether I can deliver myself with any particular advantage to the occasion. By inheritance and early education I am a member of the Universalist Church and as such have occasionally devoted what might be called spare time to the consideration of the affairs of the or ganization. I have never gone eo far as to serious ly weigh the responsibilities of the clerymen of the Church, or to question whether their duties were all performed or their privilege taken ample advant age of. Since receiving the rather im perative invitation of Mr. Nash to speak on the general topic, "An Evening With Ourselves,” and to occupy a suppositious pulpit with the clergymen in the con gregation, I have undertaken to corre late some of the ideaB that have come to me from observation and experience, to the end that possibly what I might say should not be entirely without practical value. A Christian minister must Bit in the pit of the theatre of life occasionally to properly understand the criticism that comes from the untrained mind. Many impressions for good or for evil are made upon the average human mind by the acting of a clergyman. His atti tude toward his fellow-men and his con duct in general society have much to do in forming an estimate to be placed up on the sincerity and wisdom of what he may utter from the pulpit. The clergy man should stand with us in darkness that we may Bee the light; the clergy man need be neither sanctimonious nor austere to gain the wholesome respect of those with whom he is brought in contact. He may proceed with his daily life with familiarity and frankness. This may occasionally expose him to embarassment, but it is better than dis tance, ever present solemnity,or a notice able dignity of carriage. I would at once, however, assert that the influence of the pulpit is not always advanced by a too conspicuous and partisan partici pation in temporal affairs, or in the dis cussion of public questions. Public questions effecting the moral welfare of a community, of necessity trench upon the strength of the doctrinarian, and battle should be given in the name of the church whenever the danger line is reached. It is in such a crisis as this that I feel the worldly wisdom of the layman may be of assistance to the clergymao. He is shoulder to shoulder with the masses; he has his hand upon the pulse of senti ment; he knows how deep a certain movement or social rebellion is. If the clergyman, feeling impelled, for the good of hie parishioners, to take for his text a political or social question then agitating a community, would before preparing hiB sermon seek the advice of laymen, some few of them, I believe in many instances the power of the pulpit would be more efficaciously exercised, and the possibilities for good measurably multiplied. • A clergyman may be entertaining, often amusing, without being undigni fied. A clergyman should always bear in mind that the composite intellect that he is addressing is fur below hie standard of thought, far below hisstand ard of education, far below his standard of knowledge of the Bible and of the tenets of the church. A minister is elevated in a pulpit in obedience to the accouetic requirements of the auditor ium in which he is speaking, but he should be careful not to apeak over the intellect as well as over the heads of his congregation, John Wesley said that all attempts at soaring above a man’s natural capacity was "grasping at the stars and sticking in the mud." I ab hor a sensational preacher. At the same time I confess that it seems in these days as if somethirg unusual is demanded by people to attract them to church services. Many churches resort to music, orchestration, a fine choir; others to distinguished and notable so cial functions; others secure the pastor ate of what is not called a preacher or clergyman, but a pulpit orator. The theory of the sensational preacher is, 1 suppose, tbbt while he is attracting at tention by some startling dramatic ac tion or figure of speech, he takes advant age of an opportunity to drive home same great truth, Mr. Taylor in "The Model Preacher” says: “The degree of excitement which you wish to produce by an illustration should be graduated by the character of the subject to be illustrated. The exciting character of a mere incident may be made such as to carry the feelings of the hearer away from the subject instead of carrying them to it, and thus destroy the effect of the principal figure aimed at.” On the other band, this same writer says: “Levity in the house of God is execrable, but the risible emotions excited by the appositenees of a happy illustration of truth and serving to Bwell the sails that bear the soul heavenward, or that arise from religious joy in the soul, are just as appropriate in divine worship as tears.” This expression comes from a clergy man, however, who does uot fully be lieve in the right of private judgment, love for the individual conscience, and it there is less excuse for sensation al preaching on the part of the clergy men of one denomination more than an other, it is that denomination whore car dinal doctrine is that unity of spirit and aim should take precedence over'unity of thought; the exponents of the creed that leaves something to the trustworthi ness of the human faculties. It is neither my nature nor purpose to find fault; but I truet you will pardon me it I call at tention to what seems to me to be want ing either in the clergy of our denomina tion or in the laity or possibly in both. We have id our faith and in our hearts a view of the attributes and purposes of our Creator that is superior to others; notwithstanding this fact we have not made the best use of this faith that we cherish—if we are to judge by the suc cess of affiliated membership. May I therefore not urge you as the expound ers of our faith to make the most of your opportunities, never missing an occasion to use the vantage. The most beautiful picture commands the great est price. The best of anything is most sought after. Our God is the one that satieties the longings of humanity whether in sickness or health, in pros perity or adversity, in Bunshine or shadow, looking backward cr forward. It is good to live by, to work by or to die by. It is full of charity, love and un selfish devotion to others. It seems to me that it is the only doctrine that can be successfully preached, and yet I know that others gain the favor of the many and we are always in the minority. I am inclined to the opinion that it iB largely for the reason that it is not understood. Make it your aim there fore, by your living as well as by your utterances, to undeceive those who observe and hear. Some will not set aside their prejudice and give you an opportunity to Bpeak to them; they must be influenced by our example and by yours. Those of you who live in smaller circles or communities can do this better than those of ub who live in a large city. I am frequently asked if I am not a Presbyterian, a Methodist or an Episcopalian, and when away from home I have been aBked where I preached. I have many friends who do not attend the Universalist Church. I have many friends who say they are religionists but not Christians; I have friends, intimate friends, who are regular attendants upon and devout members of tbe Episcopal, the Congregational, tbe Presbyterian and the Methodist churches. We talk occasionally upon matters of religion. I have become more and more impressed with what is commonly called the liber alizing of churchmen. It seems to me somehow that nearly everybody is a Universalist away down inside. I have sometimes thought that perhaps the mission of the Universalist Church is over; that the whole loaf has been leav ened. Few intelligent men seem to fear a perpetual physical lake of tire; few men seem to believe that the gates of that Beautiful City are never to open to them; that it is possible to sin away the day of salvation and that evolution and progress cease with the material body. A cruel Creator is generally denied. Phis, however, is largely without one great denomination that seems to hold supreme sway of bigotry and superstition over its people. It would be of great benebt to society; it would uplift the moral side of temporal affairs immeas urably if there could be eradicated even the vestige of hope that a life of sin and wrong-doing could be atoned by the fevered utterances, you might say, hal lucinations, of a dying man. It is remarkable how many men rely upon tbe deathbed repentance even yet. One or two practical suggestions and General Convention, Chicago, 1897. I am done. It is impossible in thesedays to expect any appreciable benefits from a church organization that is tottering under a load of debt. It is unreasonable to expect enthusiastic devotion, and single-hearted labor from a clergyman who is under-paid. The official board of a church that is in debt is compelled to deal constantly with sordid questions, instead of seek ing a means of drawing within its folds the wanderer and the wayfarer. A clergyman whose faculties and energies are engaged in a struggle with debt and in an effort to keep up appearances and educate his family, etc., cannot have the time nor the impulee to perform his clerical work properly, nor to lead with kindly direction the stumbling and un reasonable people to whom his life is dedicated. Theology had for its original object the explanation of natural lawB, and to day the more of nature we throw into our religion, the better for us and the more reverential to God. I believe in flowers, not only in the beauty of their form, in their fragrance, but in the story they tell, the lessons they teach and the emotions they inspire; and I do not know why it is, but my thoughts leal me naturally somehow from flow ers to children, and if this good society of ourB has dcte nothing else, it has lived to see the obliteration of the doc trine that 6ome little children are ever lastingly lost because of the lack of the performance of some finite ceremony. Children were intended for Heaven—the angels love children; and if I could convince one man that God has never reprobated a child to everlasting perdi tion, it would be a constant Bource of joy to me. Let our ministers continue to preach a progress of the soul, as science has demonstrated the progressive evolution of the body and the intellect; let them spread the doctrine of ultimate salva tion; let them get into the hearts, as well as into the minds and the pockets of the laymen; let them gain from con tact with the members of their church and with those who are not members’ knowledge of the difficulties and the doubts that cling to the struggling soul of a man engrossed with the responsi bilities of a station in life into which cir cumstances have not only forced him, but also cruelly hold him. When this is done, I will frankly admit that the mission of our church has cot ceased. Many a business man would be glad to surrender a position of power and of re sponsibility and devote himself to the welfare of human souls, if he could gain his moral consent to lay down these burdens. And where shall the layman find the inspiration for this kind of service except it be from the faithfulness of the pulpit? The clergy man should not lose heart if he does not win momentary applause. He never can know or measure the benefits and helps to the casual listener, who may disappear forever from his vision carry ing with him impreeeions that will abide and inspire to kindly deeds and heroic actions. Many a man is obliged to hurry his church work as he forces along his business affairs. Clergymen Bhould be considerate and charitable with such men. They Bhould, neverthe less, impreso upon laymen that great peace may cot be purchased with mon ey, but that a man's acts and his help fulness and his humanity and bis soul fulness in his daily walk are a greater contribution to his future happiness thau all the wealth he may pour into the coffers of the church. CLOSING ADDBESS. PRESIDENT O. L. HUTCHINSON. It will soon be njy duty to declare this convention adjourned. I wae told that I must dismiss you with a few words of benediction and inspiration. I can ful fil this request only by uniting with you in a fervent prayer to Almighty God that the benediction of the Father may rest upon us, and that the inspiration of our Lord and Master, Jesus Christ, may be with us as we go hence. I feel that the spirit of the Master has been mani fested amongst us while we have been together and that we go away refreshed and strengthened. Better prepared to do His work. In that work the church we love has a part to perform. In the salvation of the world God has reserved a part for man to do. I had intended here briefiy to consider the work and mission of the Univerealist church. How has it done its work in the past? Has it fulfilled its mission? Wherein has it failed and what may we hope for its future. No honeBt, consecrated man fears to look facts in the face with the avowed intention of profiting by his shortcomings. We need not tear to review the history of cur church and to compare our work with that of our more zealous brothers. One third of the entire population of our country, includ ing men, women and children, arechurch members. Of these, two-thirds are called Protestant and one-third Roman Catholic. Among the Protestant churches, in cumerical strength the Methodist comes hist, followed respect ively by the Baptist, the Presbyterian, the Lutheran, the Christian and the Episcopalian. What power on life and thought do these mighty organizations exert. Standing side by Bide with these stronger bodies we find our own. When we compare our numbers with those of the so-called Evangelical church ours indeed seem insignificant. Our work and our influence must not be judged by our numbers. Neither must we admit for a single moment that the work accomplished in the past is to be the measure of our growth in the future. There is not a single man amongst us who can look back upon an active life of twenty-seven years and conscientiously say to himBelf that he has done all that he could have done, that he has em braced every opportunity and been faithful to every trust. He is a courage ous man who in making such a retro spect, will acknowledge his short comings and his failures, and say to himself I have striven and I have failed> at least give me credit for the striving. The dreams of my youth have not been realized but the ideals are still with me. After all these years of seeming use less effort I have still the strength and courage to try once more to attain them We need not be ashamed to acknowledge our short-comings. A true patriot and Christian can always make a manly defense as did Paul before the Roman Governor. Our church has not em braced every opportunity, it has not been equal to the work put upon it, still we have no reueon to be pessimistic. Ret us set about to find wherein we have been and still hre weak. Let us hope to mend our evil ways, to strength en oureelveB and do robler service for God and men. We need not hesitate to look to our Evangelical brethren for help or shrink from adopting their methods it it le proved that by them they are doing better service for the Master. The I Master we serve as truly as they. In the common task there are difficulties in common. You will find them asking the same questions and trying to solve the same problems, I believe that the Universalist Church was never in better condition for loyal service than it is to day. Let us not be afraid of ourselves. There are many things one would like to say upon this occasion. It is seldom that a layman has such an opportunity of addressing so many clergymen. It would be ungracious to take advantage of it. You who are here need not to be told of the importance of supporting this organization, the General Con vention. We regret that there are some who do not realize the fact that such a body as this is absolutely essential to the exist ence of the Universalist church as an organized power for Christian work in the world. In this day and generation while the importance of the individual must not be overlooked, the existence of organization is absolutely necessary. The great weakness of the earlier work of our denomination is to be found in the fact that we did not realize the necessity of unite! effort. All were so busy in tearing down the errors of old dogmas that little time was given to the building up of a church militant. It iB a mistake to take away the faith of any man unless you are sure that you can ground him in a better one. Much time was given setting forth what we did not believe. This was then and is now a mistake. You cannot build upon nega tions. There is positive work to be done and there is need of men with con victions to undertake the task. A man with an opinion is of small account in this world. A man of conviction has power to revolutionize the community in which he dwells. I believe that we have at last come to appreciate the im portance of organized effort. I heard one of our members say that not a Universalist in the West dare Btand against this convention. This is not the spirit that we want. We must be able to say that not a clergyman in our entire denomination can be found who does not respect and love it. One of the fundamental principles of the gospel of Chriet, as we interpret it, may well be here set forth. It is "a love of service, and a service of love.” The Bpirit of this convention has been tine. I would that every minister enjoying the fellowship of the Universalist church could have been present during the en tire session; I know that each and every one would have gone from it not only with greater respect, but with deeper love. To me it has brought a revelation. For twenty years we have been discuss ing the revision of our creed. We have dreaded to approach the subject at each succeeding convention, fearing that through our action some of our number might be driven away. At lenght, we have awakened to the fact that, in what we thought was our greatest weakness, lies our greatest strength. These years of trial and uncertainty have revealed it to us. In spirit we are unauimous. Each and every one of us is willing to go forth bearing the banner of our church, upon which is written, in no uncertain words: We believe in the universal Fatherhood of God. The spiritual authority and leadership of His Son, Jesus Christ. The trustworthi ness of the Bible as containing a revela tion from God. The certainty of retri bution for sin. The final harmony of all souls with God. Interpret this as y ou may. It you are under the influence of the Spirit that inspired it, you will do loyal service for the Master, to the glory of almighty God and to the everlasting benefit of our brother man. In the other prob lem that has confronted us, namely, how to harmonize individualism with organization, great progress has been made toward solution. In the light of this session now closing, was there ever a more hopeful outlook for this conven tion? With the fortunes of its organized head rests the future of the Universalist church. The time is one offering grand oppor tunity for work in our Master’s cause. There are, however, conditions peculiar to our ege. At times, some of the diffi culties seem insurmountable. Upon some of these I had intended to speak at length. You are weary of listening. At this late hour of the convention, what could I hope to say that has not been already spoken? Several times during our deliberations have the evils I would have you consider been men tioned. Why such a lack of coneecrated workers among people who call them selves Christian? There are more Christians in the world today, and with larger influence, than ever before since the birth of the Christ. They are not, however, relative ly so well organized. For better organ ization must we strive. In our effort of organization have we kept pace with with the material development of our country. I mean in the fostering and organizing of its moral and religious forces. It took the first president of the United States three days to go from Washington to New York. When Presi dent Harrison left the White House to go from the Capital to New York, to celebrate the centennial of the adoption of the Constitution, he accomplished the journey in four and a half hours. How marvelous has been the material development of our country! Have we kept pace with that development in our intellectual and religious work? We can not expect to forward this work success fully simply by employing the old ways. Still, in adopting new methods, there is great danger. We must have a care lest we lose sight of religion altogether Here in the west, at least, we are overrun with Materialism and it requires great strength of religious principle to fight successfully against it. In doing so we are sometimes tempted to meet it helf way. Let us not forget that hu manitarianism is not religion. It is fed by religion. Alas for this world if the fountains should become dry—I will omit much I had on my heart to say: What is the Mission of the Universalist Church? It does not exist solely for the purpose of preaching the universal salvation of mankind. This truth we hold dear and there was a time when it was meet to lay great stress upon it. That day is now happily passing away. The work and mission of the Universalist church is to preach the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ. It should strive through him to win men to God and righteous ness. To bring to each and every one of ub the personal and not the his toric Christ. Mere intellectual be lief is far from sufficient. We cannot agree with our Evangelical brethren that its mission is accomplished. If the kingdom of God is fully established upon earth and there is no more work to be done among men in the Master’s name. Then our mission is ended but if there is still work to be done for Bin ning, suffering children of God we have as loud a call to do that work as our most zealous orthodox brethren. If in the past we have not done as much of the Master’s work as they it has not been the fault of our creed, but of our poor human weakness and lack of consecration. We believe that we have the grandest interpretation of the Word of God yet revealed to man. With it comes not only our op portunity but our duty to render the greatest service to our fellow man. We can say with Paul “for God hath not given us the spirit of fear—but of power and of love and of a sound mindf Are we worthy of the gift? Are we equal to the responsibility it puts upon us. Yes, if the Grace of the Lord Jesus Christ be with us and the love of God and we be inspired by the Holy Spirit. General Convention. THE REOOBD. Outline of the Business Proceedings— Motions and Resolutions- What Was Enacted by Vote, Ktc. St. Pai l’s Church, Chicago, 111., Oct. 19, 1897. The General Convention of Uni versalists was called to order at 2:30 p. m., the President, Mr. Charles L. Hutchinson, in the chair. Prayer was offered by Rev. Dr. J. C. Adams, of New Xork. An address of wel come to the General Convention was given by Rev. Dr. A. J. Canfield, of Chicago, and responded to by Rev. Dr. Geo. L. Perin, of Massachusetts, Vice President of Convention. The president announced aquorum present, and stated if there was no objection that the roll call would be suspended until evening, and at the close of the afternoon session the convention would adjourn to meet at 7:45 p. m:—and no objection was offered. The Secretary nominated and asked the President to appoint as his assis tants: Mrs. Emma L, James, of Ohio, and Rev. Eugene M. Grant, of Con necticut, which was so done. The President made a short ad dress, and appointed the following sessional committees. un Jteligious services: Kev. Dr. Canfield, Illinois; Mrs. May Bridge, California; and Rev. C. R. East, Mis souri. On Elections: Rev. W. H. Morri son, New Hampshire; Rev. Walter Dole, Vermont; Miss Flora B. Brown, Indiana. Monitors: Mr. Harry Hersev, Mass achusetts; Rev. J. Murray Atwood, Minnesota; Rev Carl F. Henry, Ohio; Rev. Chas Legal, Michigan. The Holy Communion followedi administered by Rev. Dr. A. J. Can field and Rev. J. J. Lewis, pastors of St. Paul’s Church; Rev. Dr. G. L. Demarest.New Hampshire; Rev. Dr. J. S. Cantwell, Illinois; Rev. Holmes Slade, Illinois; and Rev. Charles H. Rogers, Texas, serving as deacons. The offering of the Gunn Minis terial Relief Fund amounted to $82.20. The Occasional Sermon preached by the Rev. Dr. Arthur G. Rogers, of Pennsylvania, closed the afternoon session. A service of song was led by Rev. U. S. Milburn,of Ohio, at 7:30 p. m. The convention was called to order at 7:45 p. m., by the president, Prayer was offered by Rev. F. A. Dillingham, of Connecticut. The roll of the convention was called by the secretary,—eighty re sponded to their names. The president appointed com mittees for the session as follows: On Nominations: Rev. L. B. Fish er, New York; Mr. F. A. Winkelman, Illinois; Rev. R. E. Sykes, Colorado; Rev. W. S. Perkins, Connecticut; Rev. John Vannever, New Hamp shire. On Official Reports: Dr. I. M. Atwood, New York; Hon. H. B. Met calf, Rhode Island; Rev. Dr. F. A. Bisbee, Pennsylvania; Rev. L. S. McCollester, Michigan, Rev. Dr. E. H. Capen, Massachusetts; Rev. E. G. Mason, New Jersey; Col. J. S. Wil cox, Illinois. On Resolutions: Rev. Dr. Geo. B. Stocking, Illinois; Rev. Chas. H. Rogers, Texas; Dr. H. B.Laflin, Wis consin; Rev. U. S. Mdburn, Ohio. The secretary began the reading of the Report of the Board of Trustees. It was moved by Rev. Dr. I. P. Booth, of Vermont, and seconded, that the further reading of the re port be dispensed with. An amend ment offered by Rev. L. H. Squires that the secretary read only such part of it as he considered of vital import ance, was seconded and carried. The report was referred to the Committee on Official Roprts, to which committee the treasurer’s re port was also referred. The Trustees’ report of 1896 was also referred to the Committee on Official Reports. Rev. Dr. Henry W. Rugg, the Fi nancial Secretary, presented a re port of his work during the year, which was referred to the same com mittee. Rev. Dr. Q. H. Shinn, the General Missionary gave his report, the sub stance of which was referred to the Committee on Official Reports. It was moved by Rev. Dr. E. C. Sweetser, of Pennsylvania, and sec onded that the matter of ratification of the form of the Profession of Faith, adopted at Meriden, Con necticut, be made the special order for to morrow morning at 9:30. Rev. T. E. Ballard, of Indiana, moved to amend that the matter be considered at 9 a. m., of Thursday; seconded. The motion to amend was lost: 30 ayes and 37 nays. The question then recurring upon Rev. Dr. E. C. Sweetser’s original motion, it was adopted. Rev. John Vannever, of New Hampshire moved, and it was sec onded, that the following telegram be sent to morrow. To the Hon. Moses Humphrey, Hall of Representatives, State House, Concord, N, H. The Universalist General Conven tion in session at Chicago sends you fraternal greeting. Your long life of honored service in church and world merits the expression of grate ful remembrance from your many friends and co-laborers on this your ninetieth birthday. May heaven’s blessing continue to attend you and your faithful helpmate. Signed by the president and sec retary. The motion was carried. I Adjourned. SECOND DAY. October 20, 1897. The convention was calledjto order at 9:30 a. m. by the president. Prayer was offered by theRev. Stephen Crate of Ulii|pis. The assistant secretary read the minutes of the previous day> which in absence of objection were approved. Rev. W. H. Morrison of New Hampshire, chairman of com mittee on elections, made a partial report, which was accepted and adopted. The secretary called the roll: ninety three responded to their names. The president appointed Mr. Thos. H. Armstrong of Massachusetts and Mr. John B. Watkins of New York to fill the vacancies cn the committee on official reports. The chair called up as unfinishe ! business the proposed amendment to the constitution providing for a change in the Profession of Faith as adopted at MerideD,Conn .forratifica or rejection. Rev. Dr. J. WT. Henley of Ohio moved, and it was seconded, that speeches upon the Bubject be limited to ten minutes. Rev. Dr. Stephen Crane of Illinois, moved to amend by substitution that the convention proceed to vote with out discussion. Seconded. Rev. T. E. Ballard of Indiana, pre sented a memorial protest from the Indiana Convention, which was re ceived and placed on file. Rev. T. E. Ballard arose to a point of order. He considered the amend ment of Dr. Crane out of order. The ruling of the chair was against the point of order. The convention was appealed to and voted to sustain the judgment of the chair. Rev. Dr. Crane’s amendment was then under consideration; discussed by Rev. Dr. Sweetserof Pennsylvania, Rev. Dr. S. H. Roblin of Massachu setts, and Rev. Dr. Crane. The amendment was carried, and the con vention proceeded to vote upon the proposed amendment. The votewas taken by roll call, and resulted in ayes 1, nays 102:—Lost. Rev. Dr. Roblin of Massachusetts, moved the suspension of the by-laws to be able to take up new business rel ative to a change in the Profession of Faith. There were sixty-nine votes to suspend the by-laws, nh.ch carried the motion. Dr. Roblin offered a substitute for the Winchester Pro fession of Faith, known aB the “Bos ton plan.” Dr. Sweetser of Pennsly vania offered an amendment, which was accepted. Dr. Eddy produced the original draft of the Winchester Profession of Faith, and after reading from it pre. sented it, with other papers, to the convention. They were accepted by the president in behalf of the conven tion. Rev. Drs. Roblin and Atwood and Rev. T. E. Ballard discussed the proposed substitution. The program at this point (11:30 a. m.) provided for two addresses re spectively by Rev. Richard E. Sykes of Colorado and Rev. Prof. Fisher of New York, who under the pressure of the business of the hour, waived their privilege of address, and the discus sion proceeded by remarks from Dr. Capen of Massachusetts, Rev. W. W. Hooper of Maine, Dr. Nash of Illi nois, Dr. Sweetser of Pennsylvania, Dr. H. L. Canfield of Ohio, Rev. John Vannever of New Hampshire, Rev. L. H. Squires of New York, and Mr. H. A. Manning of Illinois. The previous question was called for and the vote on the proposed amendment was taken by roll call. Whole number of members 114. Necessary to ratifica tion 76. The ayes were 70, nays 32, and the amendment was lost. Hon. H. B. Metcalf of Rhode Island moved to reconsider the vote, which was seconded, and the motion was laid on the table. Adjourned to 2:30 r. u. The convention was called to order at 2:30 p. m., Vice-President Perin in the chair. The Committee on Elec tions made a partial report. The re port of the committee appointed at Meriden to consider the relations o f New York and General Conventions, Rev. Dr. J. C. Adams, chairman, was read, and referred to the Committee on Official Reports. Rev. Dr. Sweetser moved that the motion to reconsider the vote in the morning be taken from the table. Carried, and after some discussion, further consideration was assigned to 10 a. m. of Thursday. It was ordered that the proposed amendment be printed. The Committee on Offioial Reports Rev. Dr. Atwood of N. Y., Chairman made a partial report whioh was read and disposed of in sections. Section 1, relating to Biennial Conferences was adopted unanimously. Section 2, relating to the reduction of 'he lCONTINUED ON EIGHTH TAUB.)