f h°me ' 11 EDiTtON ONE CENT ^ L.. '' . = =-- --- \ ESTABLISHED 1832. imih AM) cooler tonight-, Wednesday ____ FAIR; MODERATE WESTERLY WINDS.! STILL AT OOOS ^ WITH THE P.S. ‘ V ___ Cost of Repaving South Orange •Ave. Remains Bone of Contention. DIFFERENCES MAY BE SETTLED NEXT THURSDAY Proposal to Accept $2,644.46 Annually for Jackson St. Bridge Favored. ft - Trouble still hangs over the "peace” pact between the Public Service Cor poration and the Board of freehold ers An effort tc reach an agreement was made at a special meeting of the road's committee of the board yesterday afternoon, hut again the South Orange avenue paving “bone of contention'.' rose as a barrier, and after a lengthy verbal struggle the meeting was adjourned to next Thursday at 2 o'clock, an hour before the regular board meeting. At this adjourned meeting it is hoped to come to some agreement, so 'that a recommendation can bj> made to the board. The road committee favored the Springfield avenue and Central avenue propositions, while the joint bridge committee reported that It would accept $2,644.46 annually for the franchise over Jackson street bridge. The trouble started almost with the convening of the committee. Free holder Amos Harrison, who has been away on a ti'lp. sought to inform himself as to the situation, and aslted to know the cost of paving South Orange avenue between the tracks with granite. He was informed by County Engineer Reimer that It would total about $40,000, Director Waller E. Evans then moved that a counter proposition be made the Pub lic Service by the freeholders. He asserted that the latter had informed the board what it was willing to do, and it was now up to the road com mittee to make the company a prop osition. Freeholder Richard I-’. . Mattia, chairman of the Essex-Hudson joint bridge committee, asked the privilege of the floor and stated that, al though not a member of the road committee, he thought that they would lilts to know what stand Ills committee had taken in tDo matter. He explained how the joint bridge committee earlier in tbe day had de cided to accept the terms of the Pub lic Service to pay $2,644.46 annually for permission to operate a trolley line over the .Jackson street bridge, which is the same as they are paying for the Clay street bridge. Question Bridge Action. Freeholder William Cardwell, chair man of the roads committee, then linked If the action of the Joint bridge committee was not in direct opposi tion to the motion as made by Direc tor Evans. The director then stated that he did not believe that the road proposition was affected by I lie bridge ,,ffer and if It was he could not see what interest the Hudson county members of the joint bridge commit tee could have in the road problems nf Essex county and why they should l,e an obstacle in the w’ay of this county getting Its rights in the road Director Evans then moved that the stand of the road committee he that the Publi* Service agree to do the same on fouth Orange avenue hs it has agreed to do on Spring field avenue, which is to move the tracks to the entre of the street and nave with granite block between the most northerly and southerly tracks. The offer of the railway company on South Orange avenue is to move the tracks to the middle of the road nnd then, as required by the fran chise. pave between the tracks and for a distance on the sides nearest the road with macadam and to lay three courses of granite block on the outer side nf the rails, which work, it Is estimated, would cost the Pub lic Service $49,806. It has been sug gested by the railway company that granite block be used for the paving and that the county defray the dif ference in cost between the $9,8«6 and the total cost of the work Director Evans declared he be lieved that before the freeholders spent any money for this work a proposition should be put before the Public Service. Company Will Stand Tat. John 1,. O'Toole, publicity director for the company, stated that lie was pnslti' e the company would not make any changes in its offer, as it had be lieved It had come more than half way in its proposition to the board. He declared that the Public Service did not want the changes In South Orange or Springfield avenues, but that they were willing to change their tranks in co-operation with the hoaj-d’s l>)an of improvements He stated th t the work on these two avenues would cost the company about $105,000, The company engineers had reported that the rails on both streets were good for another three years and these changes would cost the Public Service just $5,000 a year, or the Interest on the $105,000 at the rate of 5 per cent. For three years the company would be giving $15,000 as a contribution to the county for the improvements. Director Evans stated that It was his belief that for many years the Public Service has been falling to live up to Its franchise, which, he con tended, called for the paving and maintenance of five feet on Snupt Or ange avenue. He said that ttfe com pany had only cared for that part of the road between the rails and one foot extra. Tins, he said, would more than make up for the $15,000 the com pany wquld have to pay out. in Inter est on the money. He also stated he believed the company was compelled to shift the tracks according to a contract entered into between New ark Street Railway Company and the Essex County Public Road Board in the latter part of 1802. Mr. O'Toole said that he believed the company had made a very equit able proposition, and that according to their engineers there was a dif ference in the width of the paving strip with that of the freeholders' engineering department. He further slated, according to the Public Ser vice engineers, the cost of paving be tween the rails on South Orange avc