, vedN KSPAY, DECEMBER 31. 1919 “Americanism” Continued HaVCS without the knowledge of Lew ' [ 0 Jail a meeting: of the policy com mittee last Match and here is the Tx ict language of Mr. Adams in his copvright article. “When the delegates to this meet ing were informed on the same day th meeting convened that Hayes was loine to recommend a six-hour day an ,| nationalization of the coal miners, thev laughed. They had come from a sections of American mining re ®ionV anthracite and bituminous. They hail heard no agitation for the six-imur day among the coal miners „ n ,l were innocent of such a progr-tm being contemplated by the interna ,icnal union as the average newspap er who read it following Hayes’ pre sentation. Is it any wonder they laughed. ■ Thus the present program of the ; United Mine Workers sa for as it in- 1 voices the six-hour clay, five day; week and the nationalization of coal mines is the result of the political fear entertained by Frank Hayes, who as a result of this fear sought to go Far rington one better by including na tionalization along with Farrington’s , previously proposed six hour day. “One of the curious features sur rounding the proposed nationalization , of coal mines is that none of its spon sors within the ranks of the coal min ers can inform themselves, let alone anyone else, what nationalization real- Iv means. They have no plan to offer l n’nd no suggestions to make.” Mr. Adams proc: 'ds to show that . the radicals headed by this man Far-i, rington were simply trying to get Mr. 1 , Lewis' goat but that Lewis proved,, tr . wise a politician and has outradi-i, called the radicals. j And right here, ladies and gentle- j men. permit me to call your atten tion to the fact that the committee', ■amed by the miners to meet the op- j j erntors had no authority to negotiate , a contract save in the exact language 1 , of the contract laid down by that ? convention, and that all this talk that , the operators refused to deal is un- i, true. They couldn’t deal. They , could stand and deliver but not deal. , The Committee of the mineis was hog- j tied to a contract, vicious in its na- , ture and ruinous in its demands—and j, the members of the committee knew it.,, In connection with this coal busi-!, ness 1 presume as much mininforma- 1 tion has gone broadcast as on any one , subject ever discussed. Years ago a•. well paid and highly efficient press , department was put into operation by j, the United Mine Workers. This work j, was in the hands of capable men- I, don't doubt their capability for a min- i, ate. They mused the people of this | ( nation to believe—and Great God it I, is painful to think of the number of i, newspapers that fell for their dope—j, the miners were poorly paid, illy I, treated, regarded by the operators as i battels, and all that line of bunk. | Let me again read from Mr. Adams !, statement: | "Fed by the most radical propagan- j, na issued by the radical of the radi- j ials, the present day miner of ten or , hftten years experience is the most' ready striker in any industry. Fori 'he most part he has never performed any wot k save coal miming. He can ; not be made to realize that miners of j today enjoy the greatest freedom in I their employment of any class of; American; labor.” That's not my language, it is not , the language of any coal operator, it is the language of the man, with five years’ experience as publicity repre sentative for the miners’ union and now editor of one of their papers. And it’s true. Ladies and gentlemen, who called this coal strike? Did the coal miners want it? They did not. Did thoy ever vote on it? They did not. As a matter of fact where they did, in my "tate for instance, they voted against, t and the women, who must suffer the fost, voted almost unanimously j against ft. Lid the coal miners ask for shorter hours and fewer working hours per ,! ay 7 They did not. As Adam said when this was presented to them as uart of the program “they laughed.” Sure they laughed. It was positively absurd on the face of ft. Then why was this strike pulled? why have the people of this nation been permitted to suffer? Why has me president of the United States ven insulted, and Ibis authority as I • hies executive defied? Surely Amer-1 aan citizens did not do this, did they? i And the answer is back to my con tention—the Master Mind — and it was ! 'lone, not for the welfare of the miners or any citizen in this nation, 'Ut to further hamper and injure our commerce and our industries that the enemy nations might get back their vet. Is there anything wrong with ‘hat conclusion ? I think not And right here I want to pause long ‘•nought to say to you, there is abso “ . y nothing basical back of this trike that was not basically back of the coal strike in 1913 and 14 in your state and my state. There was just is difference and this difference only; v "'cause of several years of pub J'v w °rk the people were aroused , belief that the miners were used and poorly paid. Now the peo “rc awakened from their dreams ;r, kn °w differently. Then public •entiment was with the striker; now it » ajtamst them. Then the object was ,Tv.' ri pP ,e the industry; now it is to ana 11 out °* Ibe hands of the owners '■rill-. estal> lißh nationalisation — this cm*!? 1 ? 1 , scheme °f the master mind to control all. And in all these strikes, all these organized movements to destroy this i nation by first destroying its indus- 1 trios, what has been danced before the eyes of the president, of Congress, of the people? Threats, threats, and' more threats. The railroaders said i they would not obey an anti-strike I law'; Sam Gompers has decreed and even defied the president and the courts of this land; John Lewis when asked what would follow if the army was called out to work the mines, re plied “the wair department will have to get a larger army.” John Fitzpat rick proudly exclaimed “I am a Red.” Another steel strike leader but a few i nights ago, when ha knew that the strike was lost, in a public meeting in j Gary, Indiana, said, “We will win if i we have to bring Mother Jone 3 and repeat what was done in the Colorado ; ccal strike,” we of Colorado know j the spilling of blood that means, j Frankly folks, do utterances like | these appeal to you s,s coming from loyal American citizens? Do they not have the gutteral twang that re-. minds you of Prussiamism ? Is this idea of winning an honest fight by threat consistent with American ideals? 1 say no; a thousand times I no; such methods and utterances are damnably un-American. But let me I remind you of another threat which may aid you in weaving your story. I Remember when we informed this J I Kaiser person he must not interfere! with American shipping, he replied j in diplomatic language of course, but j freely translated, “The United States J can go to the devil; I will take carel of you when I get through over here” j and the next day he sank the Lusi tania. Ladies and gentlemen, we are fac ing a serious condition in this land. It is not of American birth; it is not of American breeding. Its sire was ■ Prussian viilany; its dam was German ; conceit; it was nursed on the milk of 1 militarism; it was reared in an en vironment of contempt for human rights and greed for gain; when it j ■ reached maturity it was transplanted to this land, here to breed more of its kind, but 1 say to you the American people are so broad, so loyal, so pa triotic, they will hurl back the vicious, doctrine to the land of its forebears 1 and crush everyone of its illegitimate offsprings in this nation. This country is not ruled by any, class. It is ruled by public opinion —by the majority. And when it j comes to informing public opinion which can only be expressed when the j truth is known, you come in, you nr wspaper men and women. I take I off my hat to the influence of the so- j called country press. I have long con j tended that the country paper, I care not how small, has a hundred times more influence according to circula ■ : tion than the so-called metropolitan press, and the reason is clear—the • people believe what they read in the country papers. And so I say to you ladies and gen tlemen of the Wyoming press at this i time you owe it as a duty to your selves, to your state and to your na- j tion to give the people the truth about these matters and I hope yet to find I the country editor who shirked duty, j iHe may not get proper reward for I the good he does—few of them do— -1 but he goes right ahead doing that ■ which he believes is right and proper consious of the fact that he is right and square—and that is compensation enough for nim. But ladies and gentlemen, it is late and I came here to have a heart to heart talk with you and it has been rather one sided. I have done all the talking, you all the listening. I have not said all I wanted to say because of the lateness of the hour but I hope 1 that what I have said may cause you I for the tome being to set yoor mental clhtch into neutral, get the truth about these matters before you print any thing or express an editorial utter jance. Do a little calm thinking and reasoning in your own way. Go into low with care, slip it into intermediate with caution, and when you feel you are right, shove it into high and step on the gas. But I am not a, pessimist, tnank: God. Because there is a black cloud { in the sky I do not hasten to the; tyclone cellar—nor do the other Am-; ericans. We are too far advanced in civilization for that. Right and truth j will prevail. The American people be ; lieve in right and truth all the time I even though now and then they run j | in reverse for