Newspaper Page Text
1 1ATPA A I Ail I i: I V mf- m if II I L v H,,u aii inaiua- iv UL A VUlLO Hons Are that Ho 10 DtA POPULIST, BOSS CROKER DEHOCRAT. SOLDIER. CLERGYMAN. BRYAN Bryan's Pretensions Dissected by a Former Supporter. Warmly Supported Expansion in the New York Journal. No Thoughtful and Responsible Man Can Hesitate. Gen. Anderson on the Character "God Has Expanded Us," Says win ucsirnv limn .ntn of Our Filipino Allies. Bishop C. H. Fowler. First Onnnrtnnitv Democracy's Death Is a Prerequisite io Any Political Reform, Says (ieorge Rutherford, the Populist Geo. W. Rutherford, one of the pion eers of the Populist party in Marion County, 111., Bryan's home county, is out zainst Bryan. Mr, Untherford lias been a Populist rer since that party was formed and has quite a following in this State, as he Js well and favorably known as a man Of high integrity. When giving his rea sons for not voting for Bryan this year, as he did in 189(3, Mr. Rutherford said: "I severed my connection with the He publican party solely on the question of finance, voting for Peter Cooper in 1870. SiDce then, till lSfxj, I uniformly voted, when voting at all. for the presidential candidate of the third party. "I supported Y. J. Bryan four years 81 because: "1. He stood for bimetallism at the ratio of 10 to 1, demauding also in the platform 'that the standard silver dollar ehculd be a full legal tender, equal with gold, for all debts public and private.' "2. The Democratic party, for the first time since the Civil War, took the affirm ative side of the live issues, and we Popu lists duped ourselves into the belief that Mr. Bryan and hi.s party really meant it lor, at least, as many years as five. "3. That party actually named a can didate for President outside of New York, a political heresy they had not dar ed to be guilty of but twice iu thirty-six years. "T cannot support Bryan and St.'von eon this year for various reasons, some of which are: "1. They stand for a 45-ccnt silver dol lar. By purposely leaving out of their silver plank at Kansas City the legal ten der clanse. their so-called silver dollar shrinks to its bullion value. "2. Mr. Bryan said in accepting the Popnlist nomination: 'It is true that the Popnlists believe in an irredeemable greenback, while the Democrats believe in a greenback redeemable in Cou. "Tom Merrit of Salem says: 'In fishing for Popnlists you need no bait. Instead throw in the naked hook; they will bite at anything.' Bryan and Tom attended the same school. "3. Bryan's party relegated to the rear the silver question by 'paramonnting' the hogy 'imperialism,' which is a child of Bryan's begetting, he acting as accouch eur in securing the one majority for the Spanish-American treaty. Then he took the place of wet nurse, having the child dressed at Kansas City, afterwards car ried to Indianapolis, and holding the pub lic weakling up before the gaze of his auditors, he attempts to justify his liai son by the following self-convicting testi mony : " 'I believe that we are now in a better position to wage a successful contest against imperialism than we would have been had the treaty been rejected.' "He, not like St. Paul, would do evil that good to hi.s party might come. "His actions in urging the members of Bis party in the Senate to vote for the ratification of that treaty, and his lan guage in justification convicts him be yond doubt, to say the least, of duplicity. That treaty provided for the payment of $20,000,00 to Spain for the Philippines, the United States agreeing to certain stipulations, the performance of which requires ten years from the date of the ratification ,r the treaty. A fight had occurred between the American soldiers and the Filipinos two days before the treaty was ratified: and that treaty con tains the following section: 'The civil rights and political status' of the native Inhabitants of the territory herein ceded to the United States shall be determined by Congress.' "All of this Mr. Bryan knew, yet he poses as the champion of the ratification that spawned imperialism as well as the chamjiion anti-imperialist. "4. The Kansas City platform charac terizes the Philippine war as 'a war of eriminar aggression. Mr. Bryan running upon that platform said in substance at Indianapolis: 'If elected President, my first act after inauguration will be to con Tene Congress in extraordinary session and give to the Filipinos a stable and in dependent government.' "If Mr. Bryan is a friend of the Amer ican soldier, us well as a friend to the Filipinos, how can he be consistent in the indorsement of that clause of his platform knowing, as he does, that it can have no other effect than the encourage ment of the latter to fight on till after November 6? "He may be able to reconcile it with lis superabundant love for humanity, es pecially the Democratic portion of it, on the theory that it puts him and them In a better position to wage a successful war against imperialism than if it was not in the platform. "The Democratic party has the bold ef frontery fo talk about 'the consent of the governed,' when they are the only party in the United States that has been and Is gmlty of governing people without their consent, and not long since believed in the divine right of one man to own another. "Had it not been for the transfusion f oxidized Populist blood into the veins of the Democratic party in 1896 the 'old. reminiscence' would have ceased cheating the undertaker, and a sandstone slab would now be marking the spot of its everlasting home. Its death is prerequi site to any political reform. It is the veritable dog in the manger. It stands to-day as it has always stood, asininely and stubbornly across the pathway of progress. "The party with which I have, been identified for nearly twenty-five years has committed suicide, and I am, metaphor- (Continued at bottom of second column.) Views of the Tammany Leader "An Insult to Suggest that We Aban don the Peoples Rescued from Bondage. IFrom the New York Journal.) Every man, in my opinion, should ex press himself clearly on the great ques tion of the day. That question is na tional expansion, which has been the mainspring of this nation and the policy of the Democracy since the nation's birth. The views which follow are mine personally, and I write themes a private individual: . I believe in expansion; I believav in holding whatever possessions we have gained by annexation, purchase, or war. This policy is not only patriotic, but it is the only safe one to pursue. Any other policy would show weakness on the part of the United States and invite for eign complications. This must be avoid ed, hence our policy must be vigorous. Every patriotic American, and every Democrat in particular, should favor ex pansion. Jefferson was an expansionist, other wise he would not have favored the ac quisition of Louisiana, with its foreign population, which in Jefferson's time was quite as remote as the Philippines. 1'n this age of steam and electricity, dis tance is no argument against expansion. We spend millions annually for mis sionary work in foreign countries. Now we have a chance to spend this money in our own possessions, and make the people of our new lands gool, law-abiding citizens, who in time will be loyal to our Constitution and our flag. Take England, for example. The people of this little isle come pretty near owning the uni verse. Are not our people as intelligent, as powerful and as patriotic as the Eng lish people? The United States is the only country on earth superior to the English. Why not illustrate to the world that we are fully able to cope with great er problems than we have had occasion to iu the past, and in the future dominate any emergency? We have a population of eighty milr ions of people: the country teems with young men full of life, hope and ambi tion. Why not give these young men a chance to develop our newly acquired possessions, and build up a country rival ing in grandeur and patriotism our own United States? I say by all means hold on to all that rightfully belongs to us. If the great country west of the Rocky Mountains was filled with wild Indians at the present moment, how long would it take us to suppress them and make them respect our laws and our Consti tution? The same thing applies to the Philippines and any other country that may fall into our hands by the province of peace or war. It is an insult to the American peo ple and to our flag even to suggest that we abandon the peoples we have released from bondage, or, what would be more disgraceful, that we should offer to sell them to the highest bidder. I Such a proposition places the American people in the same category with the Chinese, who have neither patriotism nor a foreign policy, and are in consequence utilized as a doormat by the powers of the world. This is too great a question to be con sidered as a mere matter of dollars and cents. Our people want their rights pro tected; they will not figure on the cost. Bring it down to local government in the case of street cleaning the cry is, "We want clean streets," regardless of the cost. They demand them as their right. Just so with our possessions the people want the properties acquired by war protected. They will pay for a standing army, a powerful navy, and the protection of our flag the world over re gardless of any monetary consideration. They have proved their willingness to sacrifice their blood for the honor of their country and their flag! and when the question is brought to an issue they will arise as one man and demand ex pansion as a citizen's sacred right! RICHARD CROKER. New York, Jan. 6, 1899. POPULIST. (Continued from first column.) Ically speaking, a political orphan. As an American citizen I claim the right to do my own thinking and to cast my ballot for the right as I conceive it to be. I am not in accord with the Renublican party on the finance question. In think ing that other people are mistaken I have on all questions thought that I, too, be ing human, was liable to err. "I have never claimed that the kind of money which should be coined and used by the people of the United States Is specified in the 'Bill of Rights,' but is a question of expediency. The gold stand ard has been adopted and is on trial. If it proves to be the best for us, well an( sooi. I not, our only appeal is to tne People. I consider that question set- tied for the time being "It therefore becomes me, as an Amer ican citizen, to put my vote where I think, ail things considered, it will do the most good. I shall therefore support the party of emancipation and progress. "Who dare say that the inhabitants of Hawaii and the territory ceded by Spain to the United States are not on the high road to education and civilization, and even now enjoying a greater degree of freedom than they ever dreamed of while under the domination of Spanish rule and that of Queen Lilioukalani? "President McKinley's administration has received no word of commendation from the Democratic party for its exalt ed statesmanship in our critical compli cation with China. For that, if for noth ing more, he deserves the everlasting gratitude of all true Americans." John S. Williams, a Virginia Democrat, Fearfully Rends the Dangerous Platform and Program of the Bryan-Demo-Popocracy. The word "Democrat" with us has cov ered all shades of opinion among respon sible people, and has meant, generally. opposition to negro rule and social equal ity. Outsiders can never know the losses, humiliations and outrages to which we have been subjected in our struggles to regain our rights and to re establish white supremacy. We have been, politically, under virtual martial law; and means and methods have been resorted to and made familiar which only the exigency of our situation could justify. At last white dominion is being effec tually established in the South, and we will have the ways of peace and free government. The present phase of the negro problem is convincing the North, and the whole world, of the folly and direfulness of the effort to place the negro above or on an equality with the white. Sufficient amends can never be made for the insult and harm done to brothers of a common stock and household. But those who com mitted it are dead and dying; and a new race and a new era of Americanism is upon us. Forgettiug and forgiving are the order of the day. We of the South have reached our level of citizenship. Absolute unity is no long er necessary to avert a dire danger. We can participate in public questions, and share iu government for the common good. Moreover, with our minds and muscles and manhood, we have iu spite of dan gers, in every department of human ef fort anl industry in our land, brought forth wonderful resources and achieved wonderful results. For agricultural, mineral, manufactur ing and commercial advantages and promise, our section stands as the fav ored land of the world; and our domestic and social standards and ideals are of the best and highest. With our history in the past aud latest present, froni our immediate standpoint, and with our bright outlook, what we want most is peace and stability in our public affairs. And this is the want of our whole country. Uncertainty iu our standards of value, duplicity in our obligations, want of char acter in our public men, and mere strife for party supremacy and spoils in our elections, must, each and all, point the way to general confusion and ruin. Un oer such conditions our best hopes and promises may come to nothing. That's the lesson of history. As between the present administration and a possible Bryan administration, I can hardly see how a thoughtful and re sponsible man can hesitate. Those of us who still cherish old sectional animosities have but one old idea, that of opposition to Republicanism, and they go for Bry an. On the other hand, men of business and enterprise, responsible and thought ful, are almost unanimous against him. To me, Mr. McKiuley represents, large ly, stability in general management, and improving financial conditions and sound principles. He is trying to do his duty. Under his administration our country has encountered problems and difficulties of immense importance. The Spanish war was against his will. Both parties rush ed into it and he could not withstand them. But in that our country, under the guidance of himself and his cabinet, organized a great army, and, by the fa vor of heaven, achieved a speedy and overwhelming triumph over a great em pire, to the admiration of the world. We were at once approved as a great power among nations. Cuban and Filipino en tanglements are unhappy consequences. They can be settled only by experiment and in time. The Chinese difficulties have been man aged with temperance and wisdom and general credit. Our financial matters are progressing without panic or trouble. Time and ex perience will cure them. Free banking alone will settle the currency question. As things are, it is plain wisdom to let well enough alone. Our case calls for temperance. As to imperialism, that is nothing but a party cry. We have ten thousand times more to fear from the despotism of par ty leaders and the demoralizing means and methods of Tammany and the minor clubs throughout the country, and polit ical machinery generally, than from the enlargement or expansion or exertion of the strong arm of our government fol lowing and protecting the enterprise of our citizens. In Mr. Bryan I can only recognize the champion of change, the leader of the outs against the ins, the mouthpiece of fault-finders, the head center of malcon tents, the mirror and kodak of every phase of politics and fanaticism, an 1'ndia rubber man, and an infant phenomenon. In his last canvass he spent six months in scattering heresies and kindling social antagonisms, and feeding envy, hatred, malice and all uncharitableness. I regard him as a very apostle of con fusion. He has covered up free silver, with which he was identified, because it did not seem to take. What else he has reserved in his pandora's box no one knows. I am no Republican. I claim my right to think for myself, and own my respon sibility to vote for the best interests of the commonwealth. And I think the safety of our country depends on every man claiming that right and owning that responsibility. JOHN S. WILLIAMS. Richmond, Va., Aug. 20, 1900. Theodore Sandico Issued the Proclama tion Ordering the Extermination of All Foreigners and Filipinos Started Fires. Were any confirmation needed that the Agninaldo party intended the massacre of all non-Filipinos in Manila and to burn the city itself, it has been supplied by Gen. Thomas M. Anderson (retired). He was in command of the troops at that critical time in Manila, and in regard to the wild statements of Senators Petti grew and Allen he says in a signed com munication: "Sir In the report of Senator Spoou er's speech iu relation to the suppression of the Philippine insurrection, it appears that Senator Pettigrew denied that Theo dore Sandico issued a proclamation or dering the extermination of all inhabit ants of Manila meu, women and chil drenexcept Filipino families. I was then iu command of the district south of the Pasig river, and found the proclama tion posted in conspicuous places in my part of the city. I had them torn down and one translated. They were signed by Sandico. "I had received letters from him and knew-his signature. Moreover, soldiers of my command arrested two Filipino men in women's clothes setting fire to the houses in the city. They were brought to me and I hail them turned over to the provost marshal general. "Senator Allen also asserted that Senor Torres caine into the city under a flag of truce to ask for a suspension of hostili ties. As I know that Torres was within our lilies when the fighting began it is not apparent how he came in, when it seems almost impossible for him to have gotten out. On the 5th of February white flags were hung out from every Filipino house in Manila, and the few Filipinos who ventured into the streets carried little white flags as an evidence of submission. Senator Alleu's reliable informant seems to have forgotten to mention this circum stance in saying that he saw Torres going to headquarters under a flag of truce. Torres naturally inferred, without con sultation, that Agninaldo would like a suspension of hostilities, for in front of our first division alone the insurgents had lost in one day 700 killed and drowned, 400 prisoners and seven cannon. T send this communication to correct, so far as my testimony is relevant, a very erroneous impression. "THOMAS M. ANDERSON." EX-CONFEDERATE. Thos. H. Baker on Moral Sup port in Modern Warfare. Agninaldo Would Have Been a Peaceful Citizen but for the Encouragement Given Him by Sentimental Traitors. I do not believe that the Southern bor der States would have seceded from the Union in 1861 but for the aid and com ' I fort given them by the Copperheads of the North. When one distinguished ora tor declared that the Union army would have to march over the dead bodies of 40,000 Indiana Democrats before they reached the South, the magnificent utter ance electrified Tennessee with hope. Thousands of men hesitated upon the brink of the awful abyss. They loved the Union and hated the Abolitionists. The Union was a "theory" entwined with beautiful and patriotic sentiments. Slav ery was a "condition" in which was in vested the hard earnings of a lifetime. At the supreme crisis came the promise of Northern Democrats that they would not let us be hurt; their bitter denuncia tions of the Republican party. The South made the leap. During the war we saw Indiana regi ments and brigades 'march through the State of Kentucky. "Tramp," "Tramp," "Tramp," they passed through Tennes see, Georgia and South Carolina. We never did learn how the poor fellows got over those 40,000 dead bodies of their Democratic friends and neighbors. We were fully persuaded they killed and made a corduroy road of them, because the anti-imperialists of Indiana said they would. Our next hope after we got mixed up together was that England and France would help us for commercial reasons. Vallandigham, Stevenson and a thousand other Copperheads like the good brethren who held up Joshua's arms, held ours up by encouraging us to hold out a little longer, by denouncing the war a "fail ure and keeping us posted as to the movements of our enemies. This is all ancient history, but I, an old Confederate, can see very readily' how the anti-imperialist league can materially aid Aguinaldo and his crowd. Every old soldier. North and South, understands the force of moral support. Our war would not have lasted three months but for Northern Democratic encouragement, and I believe Agninaldo would have been as peaceful a citizen as Gomez but for the encouragement he has received from' the sentimental traitors of the Anti-Imperial League. THOMAS H. BAKER. United States Marshal Western District of Tennessee. Memphis, Tenn., Aug. 27, 1000. A Powerful Sermon on Expansion and the Duties of the Hour, Preached by the Noted Methodist Divine. All men now begin to recognize the providential character of Abraham Lin coln. We see him as one of Cod's prophets. History repeats itself. One generation stones the prophets, aud the next, their children, build them monuments. Only a few souls have the intuition to recog nize a living prophet. These prophets m-iiu,- viiv.-,., iiui w;, 1 1 1 ,? iur uiu iiimi- , .... t ..... .i r:!-,. ,t i t ets; that would be mere charlatanism. Every prophet must be fitted into hi own time, snit his own environment. One comes as a pilgrim, like Abraham: an other as a hired man and herdsman, like Jacob; another as a leader and lawgiver, like Moses. Another as a warrior, like Joshua; another as an executioner, like Elijah; another as a scholar, like Paul; each uian fitting his own age. To find a prophet, we must not take the grave clothes of the dead seers, and run through the mart, trying to find some mau whom they will fit. We must so read events as to recognize the man who fits aud tills his time. He must be iu league with events. Napoleon on St. Helena said: "At Waterloo events desert ed me." He dropped out of the nick of time. The prophet must be a history maker. To find our prophet, we must find the trend of events; then we can easily find the hand that is making the bend in the stream of history. This hand we find in the White House. .President McKiuley may not fit the clothes of the old prophets, but hi' is fitting the trend of events iu this age. He so stands in the midst of the world's forces that he reaches results iu civiliza tion. He is bending the streams of his-, tory in the right direction. Sink down into the undercurrent, down below the party strife on the surface, down into the great stream that sweeps on through the sea of the centuries bearing the races up to higher latitudes and levels, and catch the moral forces that are evolving the world's destiny, nud you will find that this statement is not politics, but relig ion God's religion, that moves always on in one direction. The three greatest missionary events of the Christian era since the crucifixion of Jesus are: First, the conversion of St. Paul. This opened the door to the Gen tiles; this was our chance. Second, the firing on Fort Sumter. This made the Saxon race lit for evangelical uses. Third, the blowing up of the Maine. This uni fied the nation and sent us out about our work. It melted the American elements in the furnace of war, and made all Americans one. The son of Gen. Grant. and the nephew of Gen. Lee marched side by side under one flag and against a common en emy. These Saxons are said to be bad neigh bors. We have some dark spots in our history. The Saxon sometimes has made a bad record. Yet it must also be said that we have never enslaved a race, with out leaving it freer than it was before we enslaved it. For the ages through and the world around, there can be found no such liberties anywhere else as are found under the Stars and Stripes. The blowing up of the Maine was an eye-opener to us, and soon to all the world. Our great Washington (we should never speak his name but to honor ii), our great Washington said to ns, as a little strip of Atlantic colonies," "Beware of foreign -entanglements." It was the height of wisdom. . It suited our infancy like a bib. He pinned this bib upon us and said, "Keep in the middle of the lot, or the boys on the next lot will throw mud on your bib." So we kept in the middle of the lot, and grew till we out grew the lot. We grew from three mill ions to seventy-five millions. The bib was too small for us. It looked like a cotton patch on the breast of our uni form. We had more beefsteaks and silk dresses, more spelling books and New Testaments, to the thousand people, than could be found anywhere else in the world. We were as much under obligations to help the poorer and more ignorant races as ever. St. Paul was to go "far hence J to the Gentiles , but we stuck to our At lantic waters, coasted by our shores, we held on to our little big, contented, ex pecting to stay always in our western waters. But one day the Spanish touched off a magazine under us. Then the jig was up. Come what might, we must fight to the finish. We went up into the air, and came down everywhere to stay. This sent us out about our providen tial job; this made missionaries of us. We are in Manila. We are ready to help China. God has expanded ns; we can't help it. Yon might as well try to catch yonder eagle perched on a crag of the mountains, pluming his pinions to wrestle with the whirlwind, and then try to crowd him back into the little eggshell out of which he has broken, as to try to throttle this American race and crowd it back iuto the thirteen original colonies. Some of the old gentlemen on that old soil of some of those old thirteen colonies, who have never left it, may think it would be a good thing for our great continent-embracing people, to come back home. But it is impossible. God has expanded ns. Long years ago, back in the forties, Thomas H. Benton, United States Sena tor from Missouri, standing in bis place in the Senate, pleading for a Pacific rail road, pointed toward the setting sun and cried: "See there, gentlemen, there is the East!" To-day we catch up onr papers and (Continued at bottom of sixth column.) He Is Not Begging or Votts Who Behese Qld tandard ... ir" it ..; r i. :.. They say I am bejrjrine ffb Not at all. I never asked vote tin- iiw. lti tiii'i. I ham tn pei ; to vote against me. more than most candidates I i i r . i,i i , wan ti the gold standard until Core) lions ;ame to us and gracious mined us to abandon it, I said anviMMiv snouui oeueve mai u standard was absolutely essen the welfare of this country, he not to vote for me at all. I want any man to vote tor m iveet to do if you elect me, an can prevent the maintenance foul hi ii I'll villi (-.-ill r -iv u doiug it the very liist possible o lunity given me. WII.I.I M JKXMNtiS BUY. Philadelphia, Sept. S3, ISDU. rtCADDiW" I CTTITSC My Dear Boy You ask why the ocrats insist tii.it n:i;cri ilism ami turism me tile "paramount issues of campaign".' The reason, my son. is very plain. Democratic friends are pushing t things to the front because there anything else for them to talk about year. All I he rest at their powder been burnt oner- and won't even lizzie year. Their platform denounces Dingley tariff lii'.l. but they do not to meet us lie lore tne people on t issue. The hard times under the Wil l.i 1 1 .,,,.1 I ... , i- .....I..- protective tariff furnish au object ies free I rade this year. Their platform :ilso denounces the g sr.'tuuuru legisutuon au.i neiuauus. i com.ige of silver at the ratio ot l to But that powder was burnt four ago and events have shown the falsity their predictions. They are like the boy who. when beat playing marbles says. "Let's play son tliiuir else. ie:tteu on tar in anil t money question, they want to play " ; f .. i-i . . . . ..u -hi!.. Tmoii- !..!- ,.f ,,'; of the spectre of "imperialism. free trade or free silver, the people t, ... ... ,,,.....,! , tl.it ... .. .... 1- .... v... l .. . : l me of a little story. v.;,. i ...:r.. ....... ... :.. i..i.. unH. .! IC'lll U . 1 , 1 II I 1, u u . i iirt ..i.tn- Lilt it siAii-en vi-nr run: I lien vvurtA wa wonderfully successful. They found i-iviiii'H. i.iii isti.iii ileum.. ii iiiiMryi and temperate, "clothed and in their right minds." The incident which illustrates my point occurred during the first year of their residence on the island. A chief clothed in sunshine and nothing else called on It: missionaries. They treated him poli.oty, nut as He left the House the missionary followed him and said: "Chief, we are glad to see you aud want you to come again, but in my country men wear clothes and my wife is not accustomed to see men without clothing. The- next time yon come to see us. won't yon please put on a little clothing, one or two gar ments at least?" Tin1 chief promised compliance. A few days after, he entered the missionaries' home with a satisfied smile on his face, saying, "Me all right now." He had on a shirt collar and a pair of socks. My son, Mr. Bryan and his friend are badly deceived if they think that their "imperialism" collar and "militar ism" socks will hide the free trade and free silver nakedness of the Democratic party from the gaae of the American people. By the way, speaking of ."militarism, I advise you always to watch with sus picion any man or any party that is afraid of the United States army. Onr army is a volnnteer army of as gallant men as the sun ever shone upon. They are our defenders and the protectors of our persons and property. Hard-working, uncomplaining, brave and faithful, they follow the flag through summer's sun and winter's storms, through tropi cal jungles and the dangers of fever and of battle for you and me and for their country's sake. If a man is a good, lav abidiug citizen he has no reason to bo afraid of an American soldier. I was one, my father was one, my grandfather was one, and my great grandfather was one, and I feel like tak ing off my hat to every soldier I meet. And whenever I find a man who Is afraid of the "tyranny" of our gallant little army. I feel like asking him what he has been doing. It is a small army for so great a nation, nud the introdne tion of "militarism" in this cum; aijtn j shows that our Democidatic friends are hard up for an tissue. YOUR FATHER. CLERGYMAN. (Continued from fifth column.) look through the GoMen Gate for tis East, the far East. The ages are rolled together at our feet. We are standing by the cradle of China; she is asking us for deliverance. She has caught the vision of a Northern Bear "that walks 'like a man." and she is asking America to save her. CHARLES H. FOWLER. D. D. Buffalo. N- Y. '